posted by like_that
Thanks for explaining, but hard disagree here. For starters, their story has matched up with the videos. As for the hat, are people not allowed to wear it now, because we have unhinged crybabies that can't handle it? I see people wear actual "offensive" shit all of the time and get 0 reaction. I have been living in DC for almost 7 years, and in the touristy spots (where all these wacko activists are) you will have Trump supporters wearing their trump hats and other clothing on a daily basis. A 3ish year sample size (counting his campaigning) of people wearing Trump shit at these locations is large enough for people to know there will be Trump gear at the touristy spots. We don't see these stories on a daily basis for a reason. Even though the media wants everyone to hate each other, it is actually incredible (based on the low bar set by the media) how people of all different types can coexist in these areas. Also have to factor in this was the same day as the March for Life, where they had plenty of Trump supporters. Are they looking for a fight too? Maybe you can point out to a bunch of teenage boys acting like frat stars to drown out the Israelites as "trying to start shit," but saying that is punk behavior is a wild stretch.
The part of their story that I don't believe isn't that they didn't start it. That's accurate. They didn't. It sounds like the BHI folks were the instigators of the whole thing, which isn't surprising. They're really belligerent. I'm not a fan.
The part I don't buy, and it's only based on their reactions from the video I've seen, is that they thought Philips was joining in with them. From the video, that looked like a pretty apparent (and more awkward than worrisome) standoff. Engaging in a standoff in which they had numbers was "punkish," even if they weren't instigating (which everything seems to indicate is true -- they weren't).
As for the hats, it's more the orchestration of all of them coordinating their hats. Anytime you coordinate, it's intentional. I'm not saying they can't or shouldn't be allowed to. It's not their responsibility to keep from offending, so long as they're not infringing on any rights, and wearing a hat certainly isn't infringing on anything, but because of how people perceive it, it will almost certainly incite a response if there are other political displays that aren't also Trump-supporting.
I suppose I can see where some of this might not have been intentional. If that's the case, I'd still argue it was a lack of foresight and probably an unwise choice. It's their right to make it, so I'm not speaking to what they can or cannot do, but what they probably should or shouldn't do if they genuinely wish to keep the peace outside the march they attended.