Spock

Latest Activity

On Jan 21, 2020:

  • Spock replied to "Progressives, part 3..." at 05:30 pm

  • Its all BS, there was never a "whistleblower".....it was a plant.  Schiff had this set up since day 1.

     

     

On Jan 20, 2020:

  • Spock replied to "Progressives, part 3..." at 07:25 pm

  • Who cares.  The royal family is like the Kardashians..... famous for nothing.

On Jan 19, 2020:

  • Spock replied to "2020 Presidential Election thread" at 09:29 pm

  • Maybe the dems want a brokered convention.   Then the delegates will take the candidate that they really want but cant rig the primaries because they already did that for Clinton 

On Jan 17, 2020:

  • Spock replied to "Progressives, part 3..." at 11:53 am
  • posted by ptown_trojans_1

    Set up? Care to tease that out and explain? 

     

    The playbook has been used before, get a "fact" witness (call him that even when he actually isnt).  put him on the back burner and use him when you are out of ammo and nothing else has worked (see Kavanaugh).  Then set him up with your media, Maddow who will interview anyone, and then pull the card months later to keep the narrative going.

     

     

On Jan 16, 2020:

  • Spock replied to "Progressives, part 3..." at 09:24 pm
  • posted by Spock

    She held it to time the so called info interview of that Ukranian felon they had on last night.

     

     

    Called that one.  Maddow stated last night that she said she was working on it for months.   That means it's a set up

  • Spock replied to "Progressives, part 3..." at 11:43 am
  • posted by ptown_trojans_1

    Well, that may blow up in their faces as the Senate Rs are not going to allow or take any of this new evidence in their trial. The interview and documents from Lev are pretty damning. But. they won't matter as 1. Most of the Trump supporters and allies will dismiss them. 2. The Senate will not take up any of the information and 3. Most people are going to just shrug and not take the allegations seriously even if they are remotely true. 

    Also, the fact that the GAO came back this morning and said the President was wrong to without the aid funding is irrelevant for the reasons above. 

    This whole process is frustrating because it does seem that Rudy and company were doing some shady shit to try and uncover other potential shady shit that may involve the President, but because of the political climate and makeup of Congress, we all just shrug. 

     

    Rudy was doing dirt for sure.  They aren't stupid enough to tie trump to it.

    As for credibility coming from a crooked foreign felon.....his evidence would never make it into a real trial.  But these dems dont care.

  • Spock replied to "Progressives, part 3..." at 10:53 am

  • She held it to time the so called info interview of that Ukranian felon they had on last night.

     

     

On Jan 15, 2020:

On Jan 14, 2020:

  • Spock replied to "Impressed by the Trump administration part II" at 10:30 pm
  • posted by ptown_trojans_1

    So were those projects to actually improve waterways, dams, and deeper harbors. Now, those projects are delayed and could hurt commerce along the waterways.

    But, sure the wall is worth it. 

    Lol at waterway commerce being more important then just letting anyone or anything crossing our borders.

  • Spock replied to "Impressed by the Trump administration part II" at 04:45 pm
  • posted by ptown_trojans_1

    Cool. 

    I was at a meeting with the Army Corps last month.  They were bidding and about to award several water, harbor and dredging projects, but were told nope, hold off because as the Colonel said funds were being transferred to the desert. Those firms that submitted bids did not receive any compensation for putting in their bids. 

    Good to know funds that could be used for actual projects is being sent to the wall. 

    The wall is an actual project.  One that will actual be worth our money

On Jan 13, 2020:

  • Spock replied to "Progressives, part 3..." at 07:00 pm
  • posted by O-Trap

    Based on what he's allegedly (I haven't followed things back to the source to confirm credibility or anything, but it sounds plausible) been involved with in Central and South America, that alone would make him a terrorist.

    Having said that, most of what "he" has done with regard to the US could be seen as a response to hostility or aggression.  Occupying land and water near their borders hardly seems innocuous (we'd have plenty to say if China had carriers of our east and west coasts and bases along southern Canada and northern Mexico).
     

    posted by Spock

    Saddam had wmds.   He just didnt have them when we got there

     

    Based on ... what?  The fact that a few people in positions with a history of being caught lying said so?

    I live in a mansion.  You just can't see it, because it's invisible.  You should just take my word for it.  Makes the same amount of sense.
     

    posted by QuakerOats

     

    The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.

     

    Agreed, so let's bring the troops home to vigilantly guard our borders, be able to see their families, and not put their lives at risk unnecessarily.
     

    posted by majorspark

    Interesting to see Boogie worried about the Deep State and entertaining conspiricay theories.

    Seeing how Operation Ajax was handled, I'm not even sure it fits the definition of a "conspiracy theory" to question the government's dissemination of information to the public with regard to Iran.

     

    https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4996218

    I dont want to hear about the "link".....NPR is a left wing rag and this timeline is pretty accurate.  So yea Iraq had and had used WMD multiple times.  Everything Iraq did led EVERYONE to believe they had them and were hiding them.