Back to the topic at hand.....I saw a pic of where this guy was in Ned Peppers an hour before the shooting likely getting an idea of what he was going to do.
posted by SpockBack to the topic at hand.....I saw a pic of where this guy was in Ned Peppers an hour before the shooting likely getting an idea of what he was going to do.
From the sound of it, he supported politicians who either affirmed much stronger gun control laws or out-and-out bans. Makes it almost feel like a Life of David Gale situation.
posted by SpockYou are arguing semantics. There is nothing even close to how the female brains "work" compared to males. Millions of years of evolution made that happen.
I don't think so. The fact that we don't see this kind of discrepancy elsewhere makes me think this is more a "nurture" problem than a "nature" one.
I'm not saying it couldn't be influenced by some weirdly recessive trait, a mutated gene, or some random stray shot of sperm somewhere, but the distinction is notable between the US and other countries, both with more AND fewer gun laws.
This is courtesy of my nephew, who is from Dayton and currently resides in Yellow Springs--he is not only a talented painter and sculptor, but the lead singer/songwriter for a band called Gin Soaked Angels (they're a damn good Indie band that already has a CD out, with another on the way--check them out on YouTube)..pretty powerful stuff...
This is not what I wanted to paint today. I wanted to paint more trees. Or flowers. But this is all I had room for. I knocked a lot of things over this morning just in the process of painting this, including the painting and the easel.
This is not a request for comfort. I am one of the lucky ones; I am able to paint until I can cry, and then I am able to cry until I can stop.
This is not political activism. I do not feel a sense of direction that I can call people to; I do not feel that guns are our problem. I just feel buried beneath the news of disaster and violence.
This is all I have to give. I have never hated something I created this much.
This painting is not for sale. I am considering burning it. I love you all, please check on your friends and family from the Oregon district, and in El Paso.
Awesome.
A press conference is to be held at 2:00 today (Mon. 8/12) to announce charges against a friend of Connor Betts for lying on federal firearms forms (straw purchase?).
posted by queencitybuckeyeA press conference is to be held at 2:00 today (Mon. 8/12) to announce charges against a friend of Connor Betts for lying on federal firearms forms (straw purchase?).
You mean someone found a way around the gun laws in place to obtain a particular firearm, because they had the intent to use it?
Color me shocked.
posted by O-TrapYou mean someone found a way around the gun laws in place to obtain a particular firearm, because they had the intent to use it?
Color me shocked.
Very shocking. In the entire history of the US, I can't of many times people found their way around laws to obtain particular items.
So his friend bought his body armour and other things. Clips were bought illegally and gun purchased legally.
posted by SpockClips
posted by SpockI am not an educator
Well that's the truth.
posted by O-TrapBut the contrast doesn't happen elsewhere.
Also, there's zero evidence that a female brain is biologically different.
Actual psychology and biology disagrees with this statement. Everything from here on out is to be assumed "on average" and doesn't mean all men or all women.
There are biological/psychological reasons men are better at focusing/finishing/staying on one task at a time while women are much better multitaskers.
I could keep going but here's a good link. Neither men nor women are "better" or "smarter" but they most certainly are different and are "better" at certain tasks...again "on average".
https://stanmed.stanford.edu/2017spring/how-mens-and-womens-brains-are-different.html
I'm surprised there's not more regulation around body armor. There's no good reason for most people to own body armor.
Although this should make for some interesting debate when Schumer tries to propose stricter laws. I imagine you'll have some soccer moms who demand they be able to purchase a vest for themself and little Johnny.
posted by gutI'm surprised there's not more regulation around body armor. There's no good reason for most people to own body armor.
Although this should make for some interesting debate when Schumer tries to propose stricter laws. I imagine you'll have some soccer moms who demand they be able to purchase a vest for themself and little Johnny.
We dont need alcohol and cigs either but those arent going anywhere anytime soon
posted by jmogActual psychology and biology disagrees with this statement. Everything from here on out is to be assumed "on average" and doesn't mean all men or all women.
There are biological/psychological reasons men are better at focusing/finishing/staying on one task at a time while women are much better multitaskers.
I could keep going but here's a good link. Neither men nor women are "better" or "smarter" but they most certainly are different and are "better" at certain tasks...again "on average".
https://stanmed.stanford.edu/2017spring/how-mens-and-womens-brains-are-different.html
I wasn't arguing the psychological element, as psychology can be heavily influenced by nurture.
As for the physiology, that can also be influenced by how it's used, which can be influenced by nurture as well, though I admit that hormones obviously affect it also (namely steroidal hormones, like testosterone or estrogen).
Worthy of note, none of the differences listed are used to account for this difference, while psychology has, for decades, been under the impression that social psychological factors largely account for male aggression in comparison to female aggression.
Even still, the ratio of mass shootings overwhelms the ratios used in any of the studies I could find (the closest I saw was 85% of violent crimes being committed by men in the US in 2004).
posted by gutI'm surprised there's not more regulation around body armor. There's no good reason for most people to own body armor.
Although this should make for some interesting debate when Schumer tries to propose stricter laws. I imagine you'll have some soccer moms who demand they be able to purchase a vest for themself and little Johnny.
Shoot, why not? Realistically, the reason to carry a gun doesn't seem that different from the reason to wear a ballistic vest.
posted by SpockWe dont need alcohol and cigs either but those arent going anywhere anytime soon
If feels like it was just yesterday when the Marlboro Man created a vest made of cigarette butts and shot up that Joe Camel fan meet up.
posted by RotinajIf feels like it was just yesterday when the Marlboro Man created a vest made of cigarette butts and shot up that Joe Camel fan meet up.
Wat?
posted by O-TrapWat?
Gut said most people don’t need body armor. CC for some reason brought up needing alcohol and cigs as if they are comparable. I made a joke(apparently not a very good one) about using cigs as body armor during a mass shooting.
posted by O-TrapI wasn't arguing the psychological element, as psychology can be heavily influenced by nurture.
As for the physiology, that can also be influenced by how it's used, which can be influenced by nurture as well, though I admit that hormones obviously affect it also (namely steroidal hormones, like testosterone or estrogen).
Worthy of note, none of the differences listed are used to account for this difference, while psychology has, for decades, been under the impression that social psychological factors largely account for male aggression in comparison to female aggression.
Even still, the ratio of mass shootings overwhelms the ratios used in any of the studies I could find (the closest I saw was 85% of violent crimes being committed by men in the US in 2004).
posted by gutI'm surprised there's not more regulation around body armor. There's no good reason for most people to own body armor.
Although this should make for some interesting debate when Schumer tries to propose stricter laws. I imagine you'll have some soccer moms who demand they be able to purchase a vest for themself and little Johnny.
Shoot, why not? Realistically, the reason to carry a gun doesn't seem that different from the reason to wear a ballistic vest.
The article also listed physiological/biological differences in the brain, most of the article was about that.
It is a scientific fact that men’s and women’s brains are different, on average.
Lots of new video out today of him that night.
My Old HS is arming staff
posted by geeblockMy Old HS is arming staff
Is the school itself arming the staff, or is it just permitting certain staff to arm themselves?
posted by geeblockMy Old HS is arming staff
Good
posted by O-TrapIs the school itself arming the staff, or is it just permitting certain staff to arm themselves?
I haven’t asked it’s very recent just came up this last 3 days .. I have 3 siblings in that school tho I’m surprised they didn’t provide info to the parents but then again it’s southeast Ohio. I would assume their own guns but maybe a cash stipend to carry
posted by O-TrapIs the school itself arming the staff, or is it just permitting certain staff to arm themselves?
Our school does the same thing. At our school, only the admin knows who carries legally, and only the admin assigns. It's not public knowledge who carries. We also have special metal detectors that detect shapes. Example, a baseball bat carried into the school set it off. We are po-dunk rural, be we are proactive. Zero fucks given on my end. Better safe than sorry.
I know another neighboring school district who arms a couple people, but it is public knowledge who carries.