posted by thavoice
Huh?
I, like millions of Americans, watch sports (and movies, music) for the event and not for some political/activist statement. I want to hear and see what pertains to the game/product on the field and not a stance any player is making on political events.
When I go to a concert, I dont want the singer to bloviate about a cause or political event, even if it is what I believe in.
Sports should be an escape from the every day monotony of life.
If a player wants to use his platform outside the lines, then so be it and I am all for that.
Once you get onto, and into, the playing fields just go and play. Employers have every right to censor what their employees say and do, especially while "on the clock".
Let's see....
1. As stated before, high-profile athletes in high-profile situations have used sports as a form of peaceful protest for ages. And leagues regularly use their product as a means of promoting various causes from anti-cancer to patriotism. It isn't something new, it isn't something that started with NFL players and anti-police excessive force sentiments..
2. The concept of "OMG!?! I'm gonna have to just watch from kickoff to game end because of this!!!!" is just so hilariously whiny. Acting like it's a hassle to use a mute button or switch channels because a TV station is running something in the moment that you don't want to see. FIRST WORLD PROBLEMS LOL!!!!
3. And the "I, like millions of Americans..." bit is just funny. Seems like right now, millions of Americans are in support of that message. And I'd be willing to bet that another "millions" grouping is at least neutral/tolerant/accepting of it in that "doesn't personally effect me, but it does suck that entire groups of people are in fear of it" sort of way.
Not personally digging it is a person's business. Acting like it's a problem or absolutely detracts from the sports watching experience -- that probably says more about you than anything else.