Laley23

Knecht is #4. The Lakers announcers called him Knecht-4. It’s now one of my favorite nicknames and I cannot believe I didn’t realize it or hear it prior to this. 

I like Stefanski. I dont want him fired. But 2-3-4 wins and he will not be retained. 

I need them to lose (but not to the Celtics). I am way to invested in November NBA Basketball at the moment. 

11-1 Indiana not making it?

I couldn’t watch cause of the buffering. Went to bed. And Netflix has a Christmas NFL game in a month…

They are using sparring gloves. So Tyson’s best shot at a win (knockout early) is basically toast. Pretty fucking lame.

posted by justincredible

The Jets reek.

I tried to tell you for 2 years!!!

Colts are the worst run franchise in football. 

What on earth was JB doing for 2 years? I’ve never felt so vindicated in my hatred for his coaching!

I was also saying that in jest. It’s the exact divisive rhetoric that I hate Trump for. I can’t sit here and pretend it’s ok. 

I actually think Fetterman is onto something. The Dems have tried to cater to everyone to no avail. Maybe calling them out and saying, "This is the alternative if you don't vote for us, you fucking idiots, will resonate". Its certainly worth a shot!

I don’t mind one deep ball there. Pick it up though on 4th.

This is the exact problem democrats created. Too afraid to upset any faction of America. Cave to feels. I didn't want Trump to win, but he did, so accept it and get on with your life and hope that he proves you (me) wrong in the spots I think he has a bad plan. I want nothing more than to be wrong. 

posted by ptown_trojans_1

Was not Harris or Biden, was a Senate led bipartisan bill. Maybe it would have helped, but I doubt it.

The economy was the number 1 issue. The only way I think Harris could have won if she would have based her entire platform on improving the economy and moving toward a post pandemic economy. 

I thought Trump's last few messages in the end were fantastic. One was, Trump: he can fix it. 

The second was, Harris: Higher Prices. Trump: lower prices 

It was a senate bill, but I thought Harris was the one who was driving it? Maybe that is incorrect. 

And yes, the ridiculous messaging (lack off) destroyed Harris. If nothing else, Trump knows how to make people believe/agree/whatever word what he says and that he is the only person to be able to fix (insert issue). I personally think his plan -- at least the tariff portion -- is horseshit. It will directly impact me and my company if it goes thru, so that sucks. But I also have faith that like his first term, he will only go thru with a portion of his statements (selective tariffing, only deporting portions of the illegals and not all of them, etc). But with full control, who knows?

Oh yeah, striping the EOs was really dumb. Its like people that want Obamacare gone before a replacement is ready. Cant strip it and make something worse until you have a viable solution for replacement. Just incompetence.

I have been thinking the last day or so, and I do not think it would've mattered. But had Harris' bi-partisan border bill not stalled in congress and gone into effect, does she win? I say that not knowing if the border would've been secured enough to end the talk or not -- but it for sure would've been much better than what we have now. Would that have been enough? And if you think the answer is yes, or even a maybe, why on earth did the party not hammer that the republican's have been blocking the bill for years?

posted by Ironman92

Russ hasn’t been good in a while but started last night and went 29/6/6 on 10/15 shooting

Woe is me posts are the absolute worst. Main reason I ditched FB 10 yrs back. Twitter is getting just as bad, but still too many journalists and sporting folks I like. 

posted by CenterBHSFan

I've been trying to explain to some people that it's not the Supreme Court's job to create laws and kicking the abortion topic back to the states is the correct course of action. And boy, they just do not want to hear it. They still make the claim that RvW was law in fact. It really makes me wonder just how sick the state of our education system really has become. 

When I graduated HS in the late 80's, the separation of govt powers was taught in clear terms, boring as all that was. Are our schools not as good about some classes as they have been in the past? Is it a national, state or district problem? I'm trying to understand where this lack of knowledge is coming from. 

RvW should have never been a federal issue. I think the reasonings for the SC taking on the case as a constitutional right or not is debatable, though. And at that point, my problem is I hate overturning it without explicitly making it a law. 

I do not really think a previous SC judgements should be overturned just because a new Justice has a different thought. Sets a bad precedent, imo. If you want a judgment overturned, it should have to be codified. 

Well sure, but half would love them! 

I do think both are smart enough, and not far enough left, that they would clean up the middle men in this hypothetical.