Trump's Cabinet

Ok so I wasn't familiar with Nancy Mace's tits, so I went and looked.

They look real to me!

posted by CenterBHSFan

Ok so I wasn't familiar with Nancy Mace's tits, so I went and looked.

They look real to me!

Lol….way out of my league

Enjoy

posted by Trueblue23

Make Rubio the official "UFO revealer Guy".  He and Nancy Mace (and her incredible rack)

https://x.com/MidnightMitch/status/1853991986874736719

posted by brutus161

https://x.com/MidnightMitch/status/1853991986874736719

🤣🤷‍♀️

Yeah, would be massive spillage with that bra off

I’m interested again in this thread

Gotta admit…..I looked her up. 

👌🏼

posted by brutus161

https://x.com/MidnightMitch/status/1853991986874736719

I guess there are at least 2 things I liked about the election cycle 

posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie

RFK in health and human services. 

Mr Make Tooth Decay Great Again won't last a year.

Getting fluoride out of water is just a bridge too far, I guess 🤣

posted by CenterBHSFan

Getting fluoride out of water is just a bridge too far, I guess 🤣

He is the real life General Ripper from Dr. Strangelove....

I guess I'm just not opposed to finding out ways that some of these foods and chemicals affect our health. If we move to use natural food coloring in our Fruit Loops, I'm not going to be mad at it. If Kennedy campaigned with Kamala and they win, that issue isn't going to be within the top 30 problems I could have issue with. 

Right now the FDA gets almost half of its funding from big pharma. I'm open to somebody explaining to me how that isn't a conflict of interest. 

I'm also not going to be pissed if I never again see another big pharma ad while watching the Super Bowl. 

Upon thinking about it, it's actually kind of surprising that these issues haven't been brought into focus before this year.

All I'm saying is that if our country can find a way to start cutting back on the amount of morbidly obese 7yr olds, we all win.

posted by CenterBHSFan

I guess I'm just not opposed to finding out ways that some of these foods and chemicals affect our health. If we move to use natural food coloring in our Fruit Loops, I'm not going to be mad at it. If Kennedy campaigned with Kamala and they win, that issue isn't going to be within the top 30 problems I could have issue with. 

Right now the FDA gets almost half of its funding from big pharma. I'm open to somebody explaining to me how that isn't a conflict of interest. 

I'm also not going to be pissed if I never again see another big pharma ad while watching the Super Bowl. 

Upon thinking about it, it's actually kind of surprising that these issues haven't been brought into focus before this year.

All I'm saying is that if our country can find a way to start cutting back on the amount of morbidly obese 7yr olds, we all win.

Let me speak on the last part a bit. 27 years of having these kids in phys ed and have had a lunch duty each year as well. This year kinda got stuck with a breakfast duty.

We have a lot of healthy women classroom teachers and they insist the sugary breakfast do more harm than good. I’ve always agreed.

1. I teach in a poor district in southern ohio BUT I will say that the “hungry” kids are way overblown. It’s huge. The actual hungry kid may be under 5% at my school, might be under 3% and yes, those kids are fed extra and given foods to take home every weekend.

2. It’s a processed food and sugar fest. During breakfast a couple weeks ago it alarmed me at what they served. I checked the labels on the 3 items (because everything is in a package) and the 3 items totaled 95 grams of carbs (way more than 1/2 was sugar) and 5 grams of protein.

The average/popular breakfast is a Cinnamon Toast Crunch type cereal, chocolate milk, cinnamon Graham crackers and a grape juice. That wouldn’t fill any hungry kid up but it sure as hell will get an 8 year old all wired up. They’ll pound those grape juices. Those foods just tend to make you want more of those foods, nothing filling there. Loads of sugar.

Friday we served those 6 pack of chocolate hostess style donuts. Kids grabbing extra packs snd pounding those grape juices. The donuts were 45% of daily supply of saturated fat. They get away with this because they are “whole grain”….all these shitty choices are “whole grain”….so it’s kinda the 290 lb guy at McDonalds getting the double qtr meal….super-sized but gets a Diet Coke to save his health. I learned the “whole grain” trick from my SNAP-ed girl that co teaches nutrition with me for a month each year. She’s through OSU and I think the SNAP-ed is one of the programs Trump is cutting.

As for the obesity…the 7 year olds aren’t quite there but it’s full force by age 9, so you were close and their poor physical conditioning is coupled with the lazy desires of the day which include YouTube videos and video games. They don’t go outside anymore.

posted by Ironman92

Let me speak on the last part a bit. 27 years of having these kids in phys ed and have had a lunch duty each year as well. This year kinda got stuck with a breakfast duty.

We have a lot of healthy women classroom teachers and they insist the sugary breakfast do more harm than good. I’ve always agreed.

1. I teach in a poor district in southern ohio BUT I will say that the “hungry” kids are way overblown. It’s huge. The actual hungry kid may be under 5% at my school, might be under 3% and yes, those kids are fed extra and given foods to take home every weekend.

2. It’s a processed food and sugar fest. During breakfast a couple weeks ago it alarmed me at what they served. I checked the labels on the 3 items (because everything is in a package) and the 3 items totaled 95 grams of carbs (way more than 1/2 was sugar) and 5 grams of protein.

The average/popular breakfast is a Cinnamon Toast Crunch type cereal, chocolate milk, cinnamon Graham crackers and a grape juice. That wouldn’t fill any hungry kid up but it sure as hell will get an 8 year old all wired up. They’ll pound those grape juices. Those foods just tend to make you want more of those foods, nothing filling there. Loads of sugar.

Friday we served those 6 pack of chocolate hostess style donuts. Kids grabbing extra packs snd pounding those grape juices. The donuts were 45% of daily supply of saturated fat. They get away with this because they are “whole grain”….all these shitty choices are “whole grain”….so it’s kinda the 290 lb guy at McDonalds getting the double qtr meal….super-sized but gets a Diet Coke to save his health. I learned the “whole grain” trick from my SNAP-ed girl that co teaches nutrition with me for a month each year. She’s through OSU and I think the SNAP-ed is one of the programs Trump is cutting.

As for the obesity…the 7 year olds aren’t quite there but it’s full force by age 9, so you were close and their poor physical conditioning is coupled with the lazy desires of the day which include YouTube videos and video games. They don’t go outside anymore.

Sadder part is that I heard a statistic that, god forbid, we'd have to have another draft, a good portion of the males in the age bracket are disqualified due to obesity.

posted by BR1986FB

Sadder part is that I heard a statistic that, god forbid, we'd have to have another draft, a good portion of the males in the age bracket are disqualified due to obesity.

It would have to be an athlete in one of the main sports. Most non-athletes wouldn’t come close to making it. It’s beyond sad.

Not a cabinet position per se, but Trump is putting Tom Homan as the border czar. From the clips I’ve seen of him, solid choice for those of us that care about border security.

posted by iclfan2

Not a cabinet position per se, but Trump is putting Tom Homan as the border czar. From the clips I’ve seen of him, solid choice for those of us that care about border security.

Exactly; he was great the last time around too.  

Looks like Rubio for Sec of State / Lee Zeldin at EPA / and Noem for DHS.  

Paulson took himself out of Treasury consideration. 

posted by iclfan2

Not a cabinet position per se, but Trump is putting Tom Homan as the border czar. From the clips I’ve seen of him, solid choice for those of us that care about border security.

Exactly; he was great the last time around too.  

Looks like Rubio for Sec of State / Lee Zeldin at EPA / and Noem for DHS.  

Paulson took himself out of Treasury consideration. 

Also Susie Wiles for Chief of Staff - first ever female............... so much for Mark Cuban's asinine comment. 

He's putting together a very solid team. Think he learned from the last time around. Critical that he hits the ground running on day 1 as he only has about 18 months to get whatever policies he wants/needs to intact.