posted by ptown_trojans_1
I doubt it as it looks like this started well before 1/6 commission stuff. But, hey, whatever makes you think this is all political.
I guess I am in the minority here in thinking the DOJ can actually do things by the book without influence of politics.
Hillary could have been charged with all 3 of those statutes. I remember Comey specifically citing an inability to prove intent.
You maybe haven't followed that closely, but here's the stuff that points to something well beyond having classified records:
- The GSA boxed up the records at the WH. My guess is Trump has never touched them since leaving.
- The GSA was out in June to inventory the records. Told Trump to put a lock on the storage closet.
- An insider allegedly told the DOJ about classified records, which prompted the warrant.
- I haven't seen it confirmed, but there was allegedly a subpoena issued in June. Some things were supposedly turned over, and other things were being discussed.
Now the question you have to ask yourself is, if they knew what records he had [clearly they did], why did they take ALL the records? If they knew where the records were [clearly they did], why was the warrant for basically the whole property?
Read the statutes in question with the above in mind. Intent is why you get the broad warrant instead of a very specific one.
Then ask yourself this: Do you really believe Trump was attempting to sell any of this stuff? And if it's so sensitive and dangerous, then why wait days before serving the warrant?
Like I said, the only real conclusion you can take from that is seizing all the records in search of a crime. I'll chalk-up the couple of subpoenas/warrants related to Jan 6 that came out a day or two before as purely coincidental.
You can dismiss it all you want, but we've already seen multiple instances of abuse with the DOJ when it comes to Trump.