LOCKED: Disgusted with progressives, part 2...

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 66 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Sep 25, 2018 1:43 PM

When the nominee passed all questioning with flying colors, the left ran out of ammo and had to resort to a letter they purposefully sat on (FOR 7 WEEKS) for one purpose only:  to attempt to delay the process of confirming a conservative to the court. If they cared about the woman and her claim, they would have immediately entered the information into the record and questioned Kavanaugh.  But they did not, which again proves that, for the left, it is not about women, it is always and only about political power.

 

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 66 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Sep 25, 2018 1:46 PM

 

Latest Kavanaugh accuser was a George Soros senior Fellow in 2003. 

 

https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/press-releases/osi-announces-2003-winners-soros-justice-fellowships

 

Soros is funding an anti Kavanaugh campaign.

 

You can’t make this stuff up. 

wkfan Senior Member
1,850 posts 13 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Sep 25, 2018 2:01 PM
posted by Heretic

Probably as much proof as the people standing behind Kavanaugh, adamant that nothing happened and that the vote should be rushed through.

 

Guilty until he can prove himself innocent?

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 117 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Sep 25, 2018 2:35 PM
posted by wkfan

Guilty until he can prove himself innocent?

I'm kind of stunned that people are actually saying he should invite an FBI investigation to clear his name, over accusations not formally made with no witnesses and no evidence.  Secondly, the FBI is not in the business of "clearing someone of an accusation".  Kavanaugh's recourse is a civil suit for slander and defamation, but though's are almost always losers.  And these women are welcome to file civil or criminal suit against Kavanaugh, but they have 0 chance of winning...which is why they want to waste govt resources on an FBI investigation to delay, delay, delay because impeachment is never going to happen.

That is such a fundamental violation of due process and privacy rights.  I expect the media & Dems to say that (they wouldn't if he was a liberal nominee, and same for Repubs), but you wish your average person knew better.

iclfan2 Reppin' the 330/216/843
9,465 posts 100 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Sep 25, 2018 2:39 PM
posted by gut

you wish your average person knew better.

Unfortunately, the "average" person is an idiot. Just read responses to the dumbest posts from media on both sides and be prepared of the dumbest ass takes you've ever seen. 

wkfan Senior Member
1,850 posts 13 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Sep 25, 2018 3:20 PM
posted by gut

That is such a fundamental violation of due process and privacy rights.

Apparently, those no longer exist when dealing with #METOO........

Spock Senior Member
5,271 posts 9 reps Joined Jul 2013
Tue, Sep 25, 2018 9:35 PM

I am betting the farm that the chick isnt showing up.  Its all a political game.  They want the Kavenaugh vote to actually happen without her testimony.  It fits their narative that he will be on the bench illegitimate

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 117 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Sep 25, 2018 10:26 PM
posted by Spock

I am betting the farm that the chick isnt showing up.  Its all a political game.  They want the Kavenaugh vote to actually happen without her testimony.  It fits their narative that he will be on the bench illegitimate

Well, not sure I'd seriously want to bet on it, but I don't think she or the Dems want her to testify. 

Once she gets up there and answers about 3 dozen questions with "I don't know...I don't recall....I'm not sure" it's going to ruin the narrative.  The Dems just want to use her to gain a few more seats in November, and I think her testifying might have the opposite effect.

 

How massively disappointed were Dems when Kavanaugh said he kissed that one girl, and she came back with "I never even went out with him?".

iclfan2 Reppin' the 330/216/843
9,465 posts 100 reps Joined Nov 2009
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 8:25 AM

The more I read about this whole thing the dumber it gets. The Committee still hasn't gotten the therapist notes or lie detector results from Ford. A week ago Dems wanted outside counsel but now they say there shouldn't be, dumbass media tried saying the outside counsel worked for Sheriff Joe, The 2nd accuser's lawyer hasn't given any evidence to the committee yet even though they've asked over 6 times. It's a complete clown show and am still waiting for anyone on here to defend this shitty behavior.

And for all those who say "why the rush", umm bc Dems, if they win Congress, would try to stall from adding anyone to the court for the next 2 years. Pretty simple

like_that 1st Team All-PWN
29,228 posts 321 reps Joined Apr 2010
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 8:44 AM
posted by iclfan2

The more I read about this whole thing the dumber it gets. The Committee still hasn't gotten the therapist notes or lie detector results from Ford. A week ago Dems wanted outside counsel but now they say there shouldn't be, dumbass media tried saying the outside counsel worked for Sheriff Joe, The 2nd accuser's lawyer hasn't given any evidence to the committee yet even though they've asked over 6 times. It's a complete clown show and am still waiting for anyone on here to defend this shitty behavior.

And for all those who say "why the rush", umm bc Dems, if they win Congress, would try to stall from adding anyone to the court for the next 2 years. Pretty simple

That's because they want the "old white men" questioning her for optics.  Don't believe me, just ask ptown.  He is preemptively jerking off to those optics. 

 

As for the "rushing," there is nothing rushed about it.  He was nominated early July and they held onto Ford's allegation for 8 weeks.  GTFO.  You don't hold a SCOTUS confirmation for two extremely weak cases.  Yes,  the cases so far are extremely weak.  I am not sure how you can look at Ford's case where all 4 witnesses deny being at the party.  These are written statements to the judiciary committee, which is punishable if they turn out to be false.  Same with Ramirez's case where all witnesses she named also say they don't know wtf she is talking about.

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 117 reps Joined Nov 2009
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 8:53 AM
posted by iclfan2

The more I read about this whole thing the dumber it gets.

Someone needs to say until one of these woman is willing to attest TO ANYTHING under penalty of perjury, then this is a smear and not an accusation.

Although Ford's alleged story is allegedly credible, but that still doesn't address the reliability and accuracy of her recollection.

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 117 reps Joined Nov 2009
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 8:56 AM

Even money odds that Avenati drops his "bombshell" later this afternoon to provide cover for Ford withdrawing from testifying.  Then the Dems and their media propagandists will scream for an FBI investigation while the Senate, rightly so, votes to confirm tomorrow.

The confirmation has to be teetering, though.  If Dems keep a united front, only one or two Repubs have to vote no, and a few seem to be leaning that way.

like_that 1st Team All-PWN
29,228 posts 321 reps Joined Apr 2010
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 9:11 AM
posted by gut

Someone needs to say until one of these woman is willing to attest TO ANYTHING under penalty of perjury, then this is a smear and not an accusation.

Although Ford's alleged story is allegedly credible, but that still doesn't address the reliability and accuracy of her recollection.

Based on what we have so far, the only thing credible about her story is she was drunk in HS.  

posted by gut

Even money odds that Avenati drops his "bombshell" later this afternoon to provide cover for Ford withdrawing from testifying.  Then the Dems and their media propagandists will scream for an FBI investigation while the Senate, rightly so, votes to confirm tomorrow.

The confirmation has to be teetering, though.  If Dems keep a united front, only one or two Repubs have to vote no, and a few seem to be leaning that way.


Hasn't it already been dropped?  He has implied that Kavanaugh and Judge were part of some gang rape group.    He has made his twitter account private.  Rumors floating around the Internets, that he was fooled by a 4chan user LOL.  Avenatti getting involved makes this entire shit even less credible. 

 

justincredible Honorable Admin
37,969 posts 250 reps Joined Nov 2009
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 9:18 AM
posted by like_that

Based on what we have so far, the only thing credible about her story is she was drunk in HS.  

posted by gut

Even money odds that Avenati drops his "bombshell" later this afternoon to provide cover for Ford withdrawing from testifying.  Then the Dems and their media propagandists will scream for an FBI investigation while the Senate, rightly so, votes to confirm tomorrow.

The confirmation has to be teetering, though.  If Dems keep a united front, only one or two Repubs have to vote no, and a few seem to be leaning that way.


Hasn't it already been dropped?  He has implied that Kavanaugh and Judge were part of some gang rape group.    He has made his twitter account private.  Rumors floating around the Internets, that he was fooled by a 4chan user LOL.  Avenatti getting involved makes this entire shit even less credible. 

I know it's likely not, but I really, really want this to be true.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CalebJHull/status/1044654371030650880

CenterBHSFan 333 - I'm only half evil
7,259 posts 55 reps Joined Nov 2009
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 9:27 AM

The funny thing about it is that 4chan has already set precedent for trolling political people!

like_that 1st Team All-PWN
29,228 posts 321 reps Joined Apr 2010
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 9:29 AM
posted by justincredible

I know it's likely not, but I really, really want this to be true.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CalebJHull/status/1044654371030650880

Same, it would bring a lot of lulz. 

fish82 Senior Member
4,402 posts 36 reps Joined Nov 2009
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 9:44 AM
posted by justincredible

I know it's likely not, but I really, really want this to be true.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CalebJHull/status/1044654371030650880

Creepy Porn Lawyer running around screaming “I’M NOT OWNED, goddamnit!” is doing a pretty good job convincing me that it’s true. 

O-Trap Chief Shenanigans Officer
18,909 posts 140 reps Joined Nov 2009
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 11:10 AM
posted by QuakerOats

Latest Kavanaugh accuser was a George Soros senior Fellow in 2003. 

https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/press-releases/osi-announces-2003-winners-soros-justice-fellowships

Soros is funding an anti Kavanaugh campaign.

You can’t make this stuff up. 

Well, you can.  In fact, people make stuff up and attach Soros to it all the time.  If anything, linking him makes it more likely to be made up (that could just be me, since I've been hearing libertarian conspiracy theorists treating Soros like a boogeyman for 15 years now).

Also, it's already been proven to not be the same Deborah Ramirez.  Also, where's this anti-Kavanaugh campaign that Soros is carrying out?

So yeah, it's actually pretty easy to make this stuff up.
 

posted by justincredible

I know it's likely not, but I really, really want this to be true.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CalebJHull/status/1044654371030650880

I would kek.

 

jmog Senior Member
7,737 posts 52 reps Joined Nov 2009
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 11:15 AM
posted by justincredible

I know it's likely not, but I really, really want this to be true.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CalebJHull/status/1044654371030650880

Oh I hope this is real....that would be the funniest thing all year.

Spock Senior Member
5,271 posts 9 reps Joined Jul 2013
Wed, Sep 26, 2018 11:21 AM

this whole thing is so awesome........I would like to congratulate Prez Trump on his 2020 election for a 2nd term..  Its not hard to run a campaign against these idiots

Login

Register

Already have an account? Login