posted by Heretic
Something kind of amusing about watching the "states are overreaching and taking away rights out of 'safety concern'" people now suddenly about-facing into "YOU BETTER FOLLOW THAT CURFEW TO THE MINUTE, BUCKO!!!!!!!".
Small government was no longer advantageous to pushing the narrative that the president can make a bad choice (outside Twitter, which is the only place Republicans seem to be willing to admit he makes poor choices).
posted by ptown_trojans_1
I'm guessing the libertarian people on here would not be in favor of the government having that much power like we saw last night.
I think most of us already oppose curfews, so yeah, definitely not okay.
posted by Spock
Well Biden aint the guy either. He may be the greasiest/dirtiest politician they could put up for POTUS.
I didn't see anyone say he was. I would have opted for "creepy" and "senile" as better descriptors, but he certainly doesn't seem like a good option.
posted by ptown_trojans_1
If the President was serious about showing strength and unity at the church there was a way better way to show it than the shit we saw last night. He could have easily reached out to the church and the met with them inside during the day to go over some of the damage and to make a statement about unity there. Instead, he took the worst looking option. He cleared the park and the church for a photo op. This was so mishandled and mismanaged.
Obvious pandering was obvious. And it was really awkward looking.