posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie"unprecedented", "greatest reach ever"...
Okay, if you say so. You make a damn solid argument.
You are either delusional or uninformed.
posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie"unprecedented", "greatest reach ever"...
Okay, if you say so. You make a damn solid argument.
You are either delusional or uninformed.
posted by FletchYou are either delusional or uninformed.
The dude is a fucking moron. Just block him and move on with life.
posted by gut
Most of the sentences were reduced 15-20%. She had the discretion, and the point seemed to be that in other areas, such as drugs, sentencing is considerably different for producers vs. distributors vs. users. Seemed like a big deal about nothing.
Call me old fashioned but I prefer sex offenders get closer to the maximum sentence, not below the minimum. And I don’t even care about her appointment as it changes nothing, but giving an 18 year old 3 months in prison for having videos of 8 year olds engaging in sexual activities is pretty bad. That said, my main point was it’s laughable you called it scraping the bottom of the barrel after the Kavanaugh bullshit. Questioning actual things having to do with law is not even in the same galaxy as that shit show.
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieBut no one has benefitted more from the presidency than Trump's kids.
Definitely. Unprecedented.
posted by supermanThe dude is a fucking moron. Just block him and move on with life.
Another well-reasoned take. Spock, you’ve got company.
So this lady couldn't or wouldn't define what a women is when asked. Said "i am not a biologist"\
WTF.....serious political and social things happening around this issue and she doesnt want to asnwer? Isnt this why all college majors take general education during the 1st year to insure that people are well rounded?
So I guess she will be talking with a biologist to help her do judge stuff when these cases come to the supreme court.
The recent billboards in Times Square, New York have been on point.
posted by iclfan2Ha, that’s the bottom of the barrel? Short memory? She’s going to be appointed anyway, I think it’s fair to get her on record explaining what she chose reduced sentences (compared to the sentencing guidelines) for child porn peddlers.
That’s also kinda not true lol
posted by geeblockThat’s also kinda not true lol
Go on… being a teacher you should probably be embarrassed
posted by iclfan2Go on… being a teacher you should probably be embarrassed
Lol ( compared with sentencing guidelines) ( compared to other blah blah blah) the context guy no longer cares about context. Love to see it
posted by geeblockLol ( compared with sentencing guidelines) ( compared to other blah blah blah) the context guy no longer cares about context. Love to see it
So no actual argument? Very good defense just saying random words.
Imagine the outrage if a liberal Supreme Court justice’s spouse were involved with overt political texts encouraging a democratic president’s staff to promolgate a conspiracy about a “stolen” election. Tucker and Co. would poop on the air.
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieImagine the outrage if a liberal Supreme Court justice’s spouse were involved with overt political texts encouraging a democratic president’s staff to promolgate a conspiracy about a “stolen” election. Tucker and Co. would poop on the air.
Would be all over the Progressives thread I'm sure. Quaker would be posting about nonstop.
posted by ptown_trojans_1Would be all over the Progressives thread I'm sure. Quaker would be posting about nonstop.
For the record, I think it’s pretty bad. But the people calling on him to resign are dumb. The election deniers are stupid and fucked up the entire Senate bc of Georgia.
posted by iclfan2For the record, I think it’s pretty bad. But the people calling on him to resign are dumb. The election deniers are stupid and fucked up the entire Senate bc of Georgia.
100% agree
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieImagine the outrage if a liberal Supreme Court justice’s spouse were involved with overt political texts encouraging a democratic president’s staff to promolgate a conspiracy about a “stolen” election. Tucker and Co. would poop on the air.
Yeah, pretty horrible. If there had been a case and he didn't recuse himself, definitely grounds for impeachment IMO.
But apparently husband/wife can have some pretty diverse political views - just look at Kelly Anne Conway and her hubby. The really amazing thing about that is her husband didn't hide his political views even WHILE she on Trump's team.
posted by gutYeah, pretty horrible. If there had been a case and he didn't recuse himself, definitely grounds for impeachment IMO.
But apparently husband/wife can have some pretty diverse political views - just look at Kelly Anne Conway and her hubby. The really amazing thing about that is her husband didn't hide his political views even WHILE she on Trump's team.
I agree. I don’t really care about Thomas’s wife, because there’s no way to ultimately know what a spouse thinks. I don’t hold Thomas accountable for his wife. I just smiled though when I imagined how QO or Spock would call out the big guns of “impeachment proceedings should begin today” or “sickening” if a liberal justice’s spouse was advocating publicly for an insane conspiracy.
posted by ptown_trojans_1Would be all over the Progressives thread I'm sure. Quaker would be posting about nonstop.
Please don't encourage the fucking moron and his whataboutism.
Biden apparently went off script - shocking - to say Putin shouldn’t be allowed to remain in power during a speech in Poland. Now watching all his minions scrambling no to “clarify” what he meant. He’s like an old guy at the coffee shop ruminating on the state of the world and how he’d fix it, and then not understanding how the credit card machine works when he settles up.