posted by like_thatThere are plenty of other liberal sources reporting it for moderate ptown, but of course he goes with the attack on the source. It’s impossible for him to defend, but cue the “ehhh, it’s not so bad” brush off response next.
I wonder if our fellow fans of social media censorship (Kizer) are still on board with censoring. It seems like a lot of censored “disinformation” on social media turns out to be true 6-12 months later (hunters laptop, anything regarding covid, etc).
Yes, yes I know. It’s a private company and they can do whatever they want, says the people, who fundamentally never actually believes this.
Not denying the story at all, just that Greenwald is a horrible messenger for it.
I also am not a subscriber that it indicates a larger massive conspiracy. I am not one that believes in complicated conspiracies just out of principle.