Fab1b;392230 wrote:SYL we get it, we really do. This thread really isn't even about that. Its about interacting with a police officer when something is going down whether it is right or wrong. I think most people's point as well as mine is if you just do what the police ask of you 95% I am willing to bet of the time there will be no further issues outside whatever issue is already at hand.
Agreed. The vast, vast majority of the time with the vast, vast majority of officers, it's best to go along with what the cop is saying. I think you, I wear pants, and I all agree on this point. The point that we're attempting to make is that it's probably not a good idea to unquestioningly follow all people who identify themselves as cops no matter what. This "I must follow all authority no matter what" attitude is what has caused all the problems at fast food restaurants across the country with a guy calling in, identifying himself as a cop, and then ordering people to commit sex acts on each other. As outrageous as it seems, lots of people go along with it because someone in authority ordered them to. That's just crazy.
It's also no secret that the "pretending to be a cop" ruse is one of the most common used ruses by serial sex offenders. They show up at the door, dressed as a cop, and demand that you let them in. Or, they pull someone over on a deserted road and rape them there. While this isn't terribly common, it's not terribly uncommon, either, and it's a reason why in many states you can call 911 and inform them that you're going to drive to the next rest area/exit/etc. before pulling over.
I'm not defending the girl here. As was pointed out, we're lacking all the background, and it's tough to know how this particular instance should have been handled. I'm simply trying to make two points: first, just because you break the law doesn't mean that anything that subsequently happens to you as a result of your lawbreaking is justified and correct (that is, there must be proportionality between what you do and what is done to you); and second, following orders solely because someone in authority gives them to you is a dangerous way to go (a la Milgram's obedience studies). The "must follow orders" mentality can result in all sorts of dangerous and absurd outcomes.
I don't think anyone on here (other than perhaps SYL) is advocating for ignoring the police or fighting against them. I think we're saying that the police escalation needs to be commensurate with the gravity of the offense, and that you're under no obligation to follow all orders because in certain circumstances, that could be very bad.