0-3 last night. I'm taking a break.
I took the night off .........finished up a few more golf bets.
Fanduel did not have any Cavs players listed in the assist category, plus it appears they only list them in brackets, i.e. 4+ assists; 6+ assists etc,
Tom Kim is +220 on todays 3-ball. Yes, its a tough group. But he is a rising star, one of the tournament favorites, on an unpredictable course due to the water. I'm throwing some money on that. His group, fyi, is Scheffler and Hovland.
posted by QuakerOatsI took the night off .........finished up a few more golf bets.
Fanduel did not have any Cavs players listed in the assist category, plus it appears they only list them in brackets, i.e. 4+ assists; 6+ assists etc,
They didnt post them until like 7:00EST. So there was a 10 minute period to jump on them. I think with Garland and Mitchell out, they had to wait for starters to be announced and then run their algorithims.
posted by justincredible0-3 last night. I'm taking a break.
Ok, maybe I lied.
Nets are a 1-point favorite over the Bulls. The Bulls are 2-0 this season against the Nets already. FanDuel has a no sweat bet for the TNT games tonight so I'm thinking of doing a small parlay since I've had a little success betting on the Bulls. The bet must have at least three legs and be over +400 odds to be eligible.
Thoughts on this one?
Bulls +1
Vucevic 15+ PTS
Vucevic O 3.5 AST
Lavine 20+ PTS
Vucevic 10+ REB
+406
posted by justincredibleOk, maybe I lied.
Nets are a 1-point favorite over the Bulls. The Bulls are 2-0 this season against the Nets already. FanDuel has a no sweat bet for the TNT games tonight so I'm thinking of doing a small parlay since I've had a little success betting on the Bulls. The bet must have at least three legs and be over +400 odds to be eligible.
Thoughts on this one?
Bulls +1
Vucevic 15+ PTS
Vucevic O 3.5 AST
Lavine 20+ PTS
Vucevic 10+ REB+406
Vucevic has hit that combo 6 of his last 10. Lavine 6 of last 10 hitting 20. And then need the Bulls +1. It's possibly but you need a lot to go your way lol.
Like, Laley said earlier, may be better off just hammering Bulls +1 if you like that.
Right, but if it doesn't hit I get a free bet up to $10.
Vuc and Lavine seem to have hit for me every time, I get screwed by DeRozan.
Looks like Vuc has hit 6 in a row and 7 of the last 10.
But he hasn't hit it in the 2 games vs Brooklyn this season.
Betting is stupid.
I would go Bulls ML (highly unlikely they lose by a point, which would only push that portion of the leg anyway). That should juice it up high enough you can probably drop Vuc rebounds or whatever leg you’re least confident in.
Go Bulls ML, Lavine 20+, then Vucevic 15/8/2 at +210.
posted by birddog23Go Bulls ML, Lavine 20+, then Vucevic 15/8/2 at +210.
Needs to be +400.
Lavine may be getting traded as well.
Finau just missed an ace on 16. Damn
Can't believe how accurate Morikawa is off the tee box too. He's fun to watch. (Though he just totally shanked an approach shot into 18 after a nice drive)
Don't forget there is a golf thread. No big deal if stuff gets posted in here, just a reminder.
https://ohiochatter.com/forum/sports/2022-pga-thread?page=11&id=reply-138277
posted by Laley23Needs to be +400.
Lavine may be getting traded as well.
This is +792 and probably a dumb bet but...
CHI ML
Vuc 15+ PTS
Vuc 2+ AST
Vuc 8+ REB
MIL ML
MIL/LAL O 238.5
LeBron 20+ PTS
Lebron 6+ REB
Giannis 25+ PTS
posted by justincredibleThis is +792 and probably a dumb bet but...
CHI ML
Vuc 15+ PTS
Vuc 2+ AST
Vuc 8+ REB
MIL ML
MIL/LAL O 238.5
LeBron 20+ PTS
Lebron 6+ REB
Giannis 25+ PTS
Haha, I cant point to any of them that I don't see hitting, though! Milwaukee winning by 40 and thus under hitting is right there for us, that would be the worry. For Lakers to keep that game close, or win though, they will need to be right at that number or above.
What are your thoughts on the O/U for the Bulls Nets game? Currently 225.5.
posted by justincredibleWhat are your thoughts on the O/U for the Bulls Nets game? Currently 225.5.
Honestly, I have no thoughts. I wouldnt want to bet on anything that required the Nets to be an integral part of the outcome. They have a completely new team today.
That's why I was thinking the Under but probably not worth the risk.
posted by justincredibleThat's why I was thinking the Under but probably not worth the risk.
Right. It could be a complete lack of D and Bulls put up 129 on their own.