posted by HereticAnd that sort of "compromise party" would help clear out the trash who should be irrelevant like the bible-thumping conservative and the Bernie-esque liberal that thinks we should have an unlimited pool of money to give to all the poors.
And I've often said I don't think there's any evidence 3+ parties operate more effectively.
However, in the two party system it's possible to be purely partisan with 0 compromise....which enables people to get re-elected and retain power. Once you have 3+ parties and a plurality sytem, NOW you're on the hook for gridlock because you can't just say "the majority party had the votes".