ohiobucks1;837965 wrote:hmm. musta seen old ones then. thought it was 2011...whoops
I think the Chiz Kid was around 47 at the start of training camp (ie preseason ranking). I take more stock into Law's evaluations than his actual rankings.
ohiobucks1;837965 wrote:hmm. musta seen old ones then. thought it was 2011...whoops
lhslep134;837982 wrote:I think the Chiz Kid was around 47 at the start of training camp (ie preseason ranking). I take more stock into Law's evaluations than his actual rankings.
Crimson streak;837980 wrote:The Indians are also linked to Aaron harang thoughts?
hoops23;837991 wrote:NO ******** WAY
like_that;842042 wrote:Tribe looking to buy apparently...
http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/6805852/chris-antonetti-says-cleveland-indians-willing-deal-player-deadline
like_that;842042 wrote:Tribe looking to buy apparently...
grodt;842093 wrote:Peter Gammons reported that we offered a "good" player and offered to take on some salary but Beltran said no. Gammons implied it was one of the Big 4 (Chiz, Kipnis, White, Pomeranz). If that's the case I'm glad he turned it down.
grodt;842093 wrote:Peter Gammons reported that we offered a "good" player and offered to take on some salary but Beltran said no. Gammons implied it was one of the Big 4 (Chiz, Kipnis, White, Pomeranz). If that's the case I'm glad he turned it down.
grodt;842093 wrote:Peter Gammons reported that we offered a "good" player and offered to take on some salary but Beltran said no. Gammons implied it was one of the Big 4 (Chiz, Kipnis, White, Pomeranz). If that's the case I'm glad he turned it down.
bases_loaded;842274 wrote:Tribe offered to pay contract n a player. The mets declined
From mlbtraderumors.comlhslep134;842311 wrote:The Mets didn't decline, Beltran did. Trade clause.
bases_loaded;842359 wrote:From mlbtraderumors.com
The Indians offered to pick up all of Beltran's remaining contract and give the Mets a good player in return according to MLB.com's Peter Gammons, but Cleveland was not a fit for the Scott Boras client. Heyman reports (on Twitter) that the deal was never presented to Beltran, so the Mets must know the which teams he'll accept a trade to
OOPs! Forgot; same division. No deal.assumption;842895 wrote:looks like Beltran to Texas. Ordonez is available. For cheap too.