posted by HereticMaybe instead of constantly looking for answers that he's unwilling or incapable of giving, you should simply cut through the knot, so to speak, and come to the understanding that he's blindly partisan to the point that, regardless of how intelligent he may be, he comes off as a frothing idiot. Every single thing that is good comes from the Rs; every single thing that is bad is because of the Ds and that's that. No deep thinking necessary, nor any use of actual logic and reason. Just a pure good/evil thing where the worth and value of everything is determined by what political party has the reins and how that can be twisted to suit his "R = good, D = bad" philosophy.
There's no point in looking for deeper meanings when dealing with a person who lives and dies by the most simplistic of viewpoints.
Well, if someone appeals to sound reason when making their case, it's hardly unjustified to want them to demonstrate it and address defeaters.
Plus, sometimes it's just fun to take someone to task if they've been obnoxious.
posted by gutI understand your point. And it's wrong. Taxes and the economic outlook have a huge impact on investment decisions. I know this because I've been in Board Rooms when these decisions are made....as opposed to the ignorant "journalist" you read imagining what those discussions look like.
Most other people who have been in Board Rooms agree with me. It's pretty much only partisan journalists with an agenda talking out of their ass who disagree.
I've been in a boardroom where this sort of thing was discussed, and it was definitely the case there. Having said that, and I know you articulated this earlier, action was mostly seen as negative, and inaction was mostly seen as positive.