What would you expect them to say? We broke the law for a guy no longer president so we could keep a firm grasp on the current one?isadore;1839806 wrote:Hail Trump
Both the Comey,, FBI, and Clapper,DIA, both say no wiretapping of Trump Towers. Donald, liar, liar pants on fire.
Hail Trump. You mean the government official who did so much to torpedo the Clinton campaign.bases_loaded;1839816 wrote:What would you expect them to say? We broke the law for a guy no longer president so we could keep a firm grasp on the current one?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The liberal media has been losing their shit for almost half a year about Russia interference. But the only thing they will say about this accusation is "well, if it's true then Trump must be dirty for a FISA warrant to get approved". But the potential use of "police state" powers to target a political opponent? Crickets.bases_loaded;1839819 wrote:This is what happens when people don't learn to lose at a young age. Participation trophies ruin society.
Bruce Bartlett @BruceBartlett Take Nixon in the deepest days of his Watergate paranoia, subtract 50 IQ points, add Twitter, and you have Trump today.That tweet was on Oct. 31st. If there had been a FISA warrant to monitor the server, it would have been classified. Hillary, at that point, would have had security clearance....OR it was leaked, directly or indirectly, to Hillary's camp. Which, again, further opens the can of worms that this was politically motivated.Hillary Clinton‏Verified account @HillaryClinton
Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.
Yes, we all know about Trump's insistence that the only reason he lost the popular vote was because of the (unproven) millions and million of illegal votes.bases_loaded;1839819 wrote:This is what happens when people don't learn to lose at a young age. Participation trophies ruin society.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gut;1839754 wrote:[INDENT]Kevin Lewis ✔ @KLewis44
Neither @barackobama nor any WH official under Obama has ever ordered surveillance on any US Citizen. Any suggestion is unequivocally false pic.twitter.com/qF04X3NUvq
12:04 PM - 4 Mar 2017
[/INDENT]
Hmmmm....brought to you by the same administration that DIDN'T use the IRS to target conservative groups, or blame a video and throw a patsy in jail for the attack on a US Embassy.
Sounds to me like people calling for the POTUS to be impeached and go to jail are about 3 months too late.
I saw this story and thought, oh for fuck's sake. I still think it is dumb as shit to argue and Trump is just pissed out and tweeted out the Breitbart story.gut;1839814 wrote:Seems pretty simple to me....
If true, a LOT of people need to go to jail for a very long time.
If it's not true, Trump should be impeached.
I definitely agree with you on this. Trump should definitely draw a red line for NK!ptown_trojans_1;1839865 wrote:This story is just a hell of a distraction. Why even bring it up? It just plays in the conspiracy theory folks.
There are more important things to focus on: His new EO on the Ban, the Healthcare reform bill, and hey no mention of the North Koreans launching 4 missiles last night?
Well, Obama's strategic patience did not work, Bush's isolation and sanction policy did not work, and Clinton's engagement policy did not work. So, I am all ears about how Trump will address the situation.CenterBHSFan;1839899 wrote:I definitely agree with you on this. Trump should definitely draw a red line for NK!
Wait, that's a fact?fish82;1839903 wrote:The Obama administration asked for and was granted a FISA tap on Trump Tower during the height of the election. That's a fact, and it's not really in dispute.
So while yeah...the claim that "Obama tapped my phones" is silly and 1000% unprovable, it's pretty apparent that there was some sketchy shit going on nonetheless.
Oh I agree that sanctions/isolation doesn't work. The breaking up strategy doesn't work, either. But the last thing that the US needs is to have a President that will never be prepared to back up what they say. That was a lesson we should have learned from Chamberlain. Obama would have been better off to not say anything.Well, Obama's strategic patience did not work, Bush's isolation and sanction policy did not work, and Clinton's engagement policy did not work. So, I am all ears about how Trump will address the situation.
If we're not working on putting the assets in place to take him out, why not?ptown_trojans_1;1839913 wrote:Well, Obama's strategic patience did not work, Bush's isolation and sanction policy did not work, and Clinton's engagement policy did not work. So, I am all ears about how Trump will address the situation.
Is that a fancy way of saying there was no policy, or that the policy was "do nothing"?ptown_trojans_1;1839913 wrote:Well, Obama's strategic patience did not work
orgut;1840020 wrote:Is that a fancy way of saying there was no policy, or that the policy was "do nothing"?
gut;1840020 wrote:Is that a fancy way of saying there was no policy, or that the policy was "do nothing"?
Ehh, I not sure taking our Kim Jong Un is such a great idea. Then what? Some radical general will take over and launch a 1st strike of all their chemical and nuclear weapons toward Korea and Japan?queencitybuckeye;1840007 wrote:If we're not working on putting the assets in place to take him out, why not?
Perhaps, but if Trump wants to wage war in North Korea, he better have a really detailed plan for what comes next. Otherwise, we learned nothing from Iraq.QuakerOats;1840620 wrote:Sometimes you have to eat a toad; it will not get any prettier the longer you stare at it.
Do you think that the COIN strategy was given enough time?ptown_trojans_1;1840639 wrote:Perhaps, but if Trump wants to wage war in North Korea, he better have a really detailed plan for what comes next. Otherwise, we learned nothing from Iraq.
Yes and no.CenterBHSFan;1840643 wrote:Do you think that the COIN strategy was given enough time?
Congrats to him.Spock;1841832 wrote:How dare trump pay $38 million in taxes....should of been $100?
BTW, Bernie payed half of what he did that year. Whopping 13% for Mr. Progressive.