NCAA announces OSU penalties 3pm 12/20/11

College Sports 313 replies 7,998 views
Writerbuckeye's avatar
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Dec 20, 2011 3:26pm
karen lotz;1022141 wrote:No appeal
Why bother appealing to the same corrupt organization that just screwed you over?
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Dec 20, 2011 3:27pm
OSU won't crybaby for an appeal. They will take it like a man and then deliver pain and suffering to 12 deserving bitches next season.
thePITman's avatar
thePITman
Posts: 3,867
Dec 20, 2011 3:29pm
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/ncaa/resources/latest+news/2011/december/ohio+state+cited+for+failure+to+monitor,+receives+postseason+ban
The penalties, some of which were self-imposed by the university and adopted by the committee, include:
  • Public reprimand and censure.
  • Three years of probation from Dec. 20, 2011, through Dec. 19, 2014. The public report contains further details on the conditions of this probation.
  • Postseason ban for the 2012 football season, which includes the conference championship game.
  • Reduction of football scholarships from 85 to 82 for each of the 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15 academic years. This is an increase from the university’s proposal of five initial scholarships spread over three academic years.
  • Vacation of all wins for the 2010 football regular season, including the 2010 Big Ten Conference co-championship and participation in the 2011 Sugar Bowl. The public report contains further details (self-imposed by the university).
  • Forfeiture of $338,811, which is the amount the university received through the Big Ten Conference revenue sharing for its appearance in the bowl game (self-imposed by the university).
  • Five-year show-cause order for the former head coach. The public report contains further details.
  • Disassociation of the booster for 10 years, including among other conditions, the prohibition of any financial or other support (self-imposed by the university).
  • Disassociation of a former student-athlete for five years, including among other conditions, the prohibition of any financial or other support (self-imposed by the university).
https://twitter.com/#!/PITmanStats/status/149222619491741696
O
OhioStatePride2003
Posts: 686
Dec 20, 2011 3:30pm
What boggles my mind is that the stupid piece of shit Rich Rod has gotten TWO schools placed on probation, yet he's able to take jobs like the one at Arizona and not have to face the consequences.
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 20, 2011 3:33pm
OhioStatePride2003;1022174 wrote:What boggles my mind is that the stupid piece of **** Rich Rod has gotten TWO schools placed on probation, yet he's able to take jobs like the one at Arizona and not have to face the consequences.
OSU is held to the highest standard. If a recruit litters, we deserve the death penalty. If you want to be the premier academic and athletic institution on the planet, you have to be held to these standards.
sherm03's avatar
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Dec 20, 2011 3:37pm
One year bowl ban, huh?

Well, I guess I'll just add this to the long list of stuff sleeper told me to book that he was completely wrong on.
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Dec 20, 2011 3:39pm
OhioStatePride2003;1022174 wrote:What boggles my mind is that the stupid piece of shit Rich Rod has gotten TWO schools placed on probation, yet he's able to take jobs like the one at Arizona and not have to face the consequences.
Coach Cal ring a bell....
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 20, 2011 3:41pm
sherm03;1022182 wrote:One year bowl ban, huh?

Well, I guess I'll just add this to the long list of stuff sleeper told me to book that he was completely wrong on.
You can book this while you're at it. ND and OSU have the same chance to win a BCS bowl game next year. LOL
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Dec 20, 2011 3:41pm
So the game against the skunkbears on 11/24/12 will be our bowl game, eh? :thumbup:
OneBuckeye's avatar
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Dec 20, 2011 3:42pm
Dunn and Pittman say there are still buckeyes. Spence is the one to worry about. I think we keep everyone, but it may be hard to finish the class as strong as we were going to.
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 20, 2011 3:44pm
OneBuckeye;1022205 wrote:Dunn and Pittman say there are still buckeyes. Spence is the one to worry about. I think we keep everyone, but it may be hard to finish the class as strong as we were going to.
If Spence leaves, he's not a winner and we don't want him. Let him go play for Notre Dame where he can rot his way to the NFL.
se-alum's avatar
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Dec 20, 2011 3:45pm
OneBuckeye;1022205 wrote:Dunn and Pittman say there are still buckeyes. Spence is the one to worry about. I think we keep everyone, but it may be hard to finish the class as strong as we were going to.
Obviously, I can't speak for recruits, but I know I would be willing to give up one year to make 3 straight runs at a National Championship. Spence's other option was Maryland, where he would likely never be on a top 10 team, let alone a NC contender.
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Dec 20, 2011 3:46pm
sleeper;1022208 wrote:If Spence leaves, he's not a winner and we don't want him. Let him go play for Notre Dame where he can rot his way to the NFL.
Or wind up dead.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Dec 20, 2011 3:46pm
Nobody's going anywhere--these kids want to play for Meyer, and they will.
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 20, 2011 3:47pm
Heretic;1022213 wrote:Or wind up dead.
With BKs coaching experience, he'd probably think Spence's best ability would be to film the team on a windy day.
sherm03's avatar
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Dec 20, 2011 3:48pm
sleeper;1022194 wrote:You can book this while you're at it. ND and OSU have the same chance to win a BCS bowl game next year. LOL
Rehashing the same joke twice...word for word...within the same afternoon? I thought someone as versed in the world of comedy as you would know that something like that is hacky.

And also, using your recent success of booked items​, I'll take this as good news for the Irish.
Mulva's avatar
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Dec 20, 2011 3:51pm
I don't get why a 1 year bowl ban would have much of an impact on future recruits.

It's too bad for the guys who are going to be seniors next year.
E
elbuckeye28
Posts: 919
Dec 20, 2011 3:52pm
I really don't think that these penalties are all that bad. I mean the one year bowl ban sucks, but considering how bad this entire situation was handled throughout, we could have gotten much worse.
A
Al Bundy
Posts: 4,180
Dec 20, 2011 3:53pm
Mulva;1022224 wrote:I don't get why a 1 year bowl ban would have much of an impact on future recruits.

It's too bad for the guys who are going to be seniors next year.
I wonder what impact it will have on someone like Simon who could opt for the draft.
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 20, 2011 3:54pm
sherm03;1022219 wrote:Rehashing the same joke twice...word for word...within the same afternoon? I thought someone as versed in the world of comedy as you would know that something like that is hacky.

And also, using your recent success of booked items​, I'll take this as good news for the Irish.
It's not a joke its the truth and you know it. Despite playing a cake powderpuff schedule and all of ND nation predicting an undefeated season, they ended up with 4 losses(soon to be 5 with the inevitable bowl loss). Enjoy!
E
elbuckeye28
Posts: 919
Dec 20, 2011 3:54pm
Mulva;1022224 wrote:I don't get why a 1 year bowl ban would have much of an impact on future recruits.

It's too bad for the guys who are going to be seniors next year.
USC's recruiting hasn't been impacted too much, and they had much worse penalties.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Dec 20, 2011 3:55pm
elbuckeye28;1022225 wrote:I really don't think that these penalties are all that bad. I mean the one year bowl ban sucks, but considering how bad this entire situation was handled throughout, we could have gotten much worse.
I agree, but I think a lot of this vitriol is because we were led to believe that there would be no bowl ban. Maybe it's our fault for seeing the glass as half full, but we should've known that the NCAA is bi-polar and that anything can, and DID, happen.
OneBuckeye's avatar
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Dec 20, 2011 3:55pm
Al Bundy;1022229 wrote:I wonder what impact it will have on someone like Simon who could opt for the draft.
Simon could go. and I would blame him. I kind of hope Howard goes. Stoney needs to stay. Urban's offense can up his draft stock the most.
ytownfootball's avatar
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Dec 20, 2011 3:56pm
Mulva;1022224 wrote:I don't get why a 1 year bowl ban would have much of an impact on future recruits.

It's too bad for the guys who are going to be seniors next year.
It doesn't to me anyway, so you miss a bowl game your freshman year, who gives a shit, you're playing at Ohio State under Urban Meyer.
elbuckeye28;1022225 wrote:I really don't think that these penalties are all that bad. I mean the one year bowl ban sucks, but considering how bad this entire situation was handled throughout, we could have gotten much worse.
There would have been a whooole lot of new precedents being set other than the one that just was.
sherm03's avatar
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Dec 20, 2011 3:57pm
Al Bundy;1022229 wrote:I wonder what impact it will have on someone like Simon who could opt for the draft.
I still think John Simon comes back next year.