hoops23;637810 wrote:He seems like a very intelligent guy and a great football mind. He's also great with QB's, which is good news for Colt McCoy.
As for the rebuilding remarks, eh..
We've been rebuilding, but we're still only a good offseason away. Switching to a 4-3 isn't a big deal, as our defense as is, is probably better equipped for a 4-3 anyway. Rogers and Rubin could both line up at DT then and our LB's aren't blitzing LB's anyway.
We've seen before though that team with even worse records than the Browns, have hired completely new staffs and turned it around the next season, some even making the playoffs.
No one knows if he will work out or not, but all season we were hearing names like Gruden and Cowher. Then to get someone that no one had heard of, is just a little underwhelming. Can't say it's a bad hire, but can't say it's great either.
As for his performance in St. Louis, he was basically coaching the Browns offense. They had the same RB, no WR's and a rookie QB. Obviously Bradford has much much more talent than McCoy, but I guess like the aspect that he's used to working with little.
Regarding your comment that it is good news for McCoy. This is where I am hesitant to be thrilled. The Browns need a franchise QB, and I am not in the belief that McCoy will ever be anything better than average.
And the Browns are more than a year away. Even if they have a great draft this year, it will take a couple years for those guys to mature and be ready to compete with the likes of Baltimore and Pitt.