Pat Shurmur to Cleveland?

Home Archive Pro Sports Pat Shurmur to Cleveland?
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Jan 13, 2011 5:24 PM
Good thoughts, Writerbuckeye. Heck, I like going to high school games more than even college, let alone pro.
Jan 13, 2011 5:24pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Jan 13, 2011 5:37 PM
Writerbuckeye;637333 wrote:I have no idea whether this is a good move or not -- and I was not a fan of firing Mangini after only two years. I wanted them to revamp the offensive coaching and leave the rest alone for the sake of continuity. Changing coaches every few years will never get you a winning team.

Now it looks like we are officially rebuilding once again.

A new coach, who will likely bring in almost all new coaches, including a defensive coordinator that is unlikely to run the 3-4. So we're REALLY rebuilding from scratch on that side of the ball.

If they can't retain Seely as special teams coach (he's likely gone since he also held an assistant coach's title), then the loss is magnified by quite a bit more, since he had Cleveland's special teams near the top of the league during his tenure.

Like all Browns fans, I want to believe Holmgren has it right and knows what he's doing here. If this turns out to be an ego move (having his guy in place instead of the owner's) or some twisted thing that came about because all these folks have the same agent, then I will likely drop the NFL like I dropped MLB about 10 years ago.

After a while, you just get sick of the ineptitude and realize it's not worth the emotional toll. I'll always treasure the memories I have of learning football while watching the Browns with my father and grandfather, and the important part it played in our family during those years. But those times are long gone, and what has masqueraded as the Browns (somewhat) under Modell and definitely since "the return" hasn't been but a ghost of the proud franchise I grew up with.

I pretty much lost my passion for pro football overall after the Browns were stolen. Having several years without watching one second of an NFL game, really detached me from the sport. Since 1999, I've only watched one NFL playoff game (the Browns were in it, obviously) and no other playoff games or Super Bowls. So it's not like I'm heavily invested in the league, other than watching the Browns.

Honestly, I get tons more enjoyment from college sports these days than I do from anything professional, and that's not going to be changing. It's just a matter of whether I feel like investing myself in another complete rebuild or not.

Writer no one really cares whether or not you root for the Browns or not...you just spent time typing all that and it literally is retarded.
Jan 13, 2011 5:37pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Jan 13, 2011 5:38 PM
QuakerOats;637348 wrote:Heck, I like going to high school games more than even college, let alone pro.

COOL! Then go chat about high school sports or college sports and GTFO of this thread!
Jan 13, 2011 5:38pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
Jan 13, 2011 6:32 PM
SportsAndLady;637352 wrote:Writer no one really cares whether or not you root for the Browns or not...you just spent time typing all that and it literally is retarded.

If it truly were retarded, then you'd be the first to know.
Jan 13, 2011 6:32pm
Jester's avatar

Jester

Valedictorian Hater

700 posts
Jan 13, 2011 6:42 PM
John Fox was hired by the Broncos to be their head coach, so he's out as a potential coordinator.

Also, let's all thank S&L for his valuable contributions to this thread.
Jan 13, 2011 6:42pm
OQB's avatar

OQB

Senior Member

6,679 posts
Jan 13, 2011 6:57 PM
QuakerOats;637348 wrote:Good thoughts, Writerbuckeye. Heck, I like going to high school games more than even college, let alone pro.

I like watching all levels of sports, but there is just something about Friday nights that gets me fired up. I just enjoy watching players play their hearts out for the love of the game instead of the money in the game. But like I said I enjoy watching all levels.
Jan 13, 2011 6:57pm
CinciX12's avatar

CinciX12

Senior Member

2,874 posts
Jan 13, 2011 7:10 PM
He was 26th in scoring offense with an offense that one could argue was about on pace with Cleveland. I guess Cleveland just wanted the same philosophy type guys in the front office? Because this doesn't really seem to make a lot of sense to me.
Jan 13, 2011 7:10pm
just_a_swimmer's avatar

just_a_swimmer

Senior Member

674 posts
Jan 13, 2011 7:36 PM
Writerbuckeye;637333 wrote:I have no idea whether this is a good move or not -- and I was not a fan of firing Mangini after only two years. I wanted them to revamp the offensive coaching and leave the rest alone for the sake of continuity. Changing coaches every few years will never get you a winning team.

Now it looks like we are officially rebuilding once again.

A new coach, who will likely bring in almost all new coaches, including a defensive coordinator that is unlikely to run the 3-4. So we're REALLY rebuilding from scratch on that side of the ball.

If they can't retain Seely as special teams coach (he's likely gone since he also held an assistant coach's title), then the loss is magnified by quite a bit more, since he had Cleveland's special teams near the top of the league during his tenure.

Like all Browns fans, I want to believe Holmgren has it right and knows what he's doing here. If this turns out to be an ego move (having his guy in place instead of the owner's) or some twisted thing that came about because all these folks have the same agent, then I will likely drop the NFL like I dropped MLB about 10 years ago.

After a while, you just get sick of the ineptitude and realize it's not worth the emotional toll. I'll always treasure the memories I have of learning football while watching the Browns with my father and grandfather, and the important part it played in our family during those years. But those times are long gone, and what has masqueraded as the Browns (somewhat) under Modell and definitely since "the return" hasn't been but a ghost of the proud franchise I grew up with.

I pretty much lost my passion for pro football overall after the Browns were stolen. Having several years without watching one second of an NFL game, really detached me from the sport. Since 1999, I've only watched one NFL playoff game (the Browns were in it, obviously) and no other playoff games or Super Bowls. So it's not like I'm heavily invested in the league, other than watching the Browns.

Honestly, I get tons more enjoyment from college sports these days than I do from anything professional, and that's not going to be changing. It's just a matter of whether I feel like investing myself in another complete rebuild or not.

+1
Jan 13, 2011 7:36pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Jan 13, 2011 8:32 PM
I mean you're a great poster writer, but if you dont wanna be a Browns fan, then don't lol don't get on here and whine to us about the organization.
Jan 13, 2011 8:32pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Jan 13, 2011 9:34 PM
everyone is entitled to an opinion on the matter

writerbuckeye went about it in greater detail but I found it to be an interesting read
Jan 13, 2011 9:34pm
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Jan 13, 2011 10:14 PM
CinciX12;637421 wrote:He was 26th in scoring offense with an offense that one could argue was about on pace with Cleveland. I guess Cleveland just wanted the same philosophy type guys in the front office? Because this doesn't really seem to make a lot of sense to me.
well i guess the good thing is he isn't calling the plays. im willing to bet gil haskell will be our OC. who was john harbaugh before he was hired? who was mike smith before he went to atlanta? i had no idea. im putting all my faith into this front office. we are going to have stability for once. im excited for pat shurmur to see what he can do what colt mccoy. i just hope hes got fire in his belly. im tired of these lame duck coaches. personality wise.

on a side note. why did they have eric mangini on espn to anyalize the hiring of pat shurmur? i mean eric won me over hands down, the first year i didn't trust him but he def had this team on the right track. just wrong place wrong time.. but eric is a stand up guy, he had nothing but good to say about the browns organization and our front office.
Jan 13, 2011 10:14pm
Z

zach24oz

Senior Member

598 posts
Jan 13, 2011 10:46 PM
What names that are out there would be a good hire? who is an actual legit candidate for the coaching job? Jon Gurden said he didnt want to coach and enjoyed working for ESPN, I mean who did you really want them to hire? Brad Childress? Marty Morningwheg? I really didnt see anyone who would have been an impressive hire. If Rob Ryan would happen to leave, I don't really know who they would be looking at as the DC. I'm guessing they would probably switch to a 4-3 if he would leave but I dont know...and they needed to get a head coach in so they can start preparations for the upcoming draft and get the assistants in and moving on with what they want to do.
Jan 13, 2011 10:46pm
OQB's avatar

OQB

Senior Member

6,679 posts
Jan 13, 2011 11:14 PM
Jon Gurden? Who is he? :) Some no name coach I suppose!

The defensive coordinator position is the next thing to get settled...If we switch to a 4-3 are defense is now in rebuilding mode instead of on the uprise. We would have to get some more bodies up front, and if we do go to a 4-3 their is no doubt in my mind we go with a DL with our first pick. I think we need to package a player or picks together to somehow get 2 first round picks, or something. We need all the talent we can get in this draft, and the odds of picking a pro bowler in round 6-7 is highly doubtful.

I'd like to see us trade Vickers away, the FB is not a main priority in the West coast offense and he has high trade value. We could also trade Rogers away and get an early 2-3 round pick.

I look for us to try and get as many draft picks as we can....
Jan 13, 2011 11:14pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
Jan 13, 2011 11:26 PM
SportsAndLady;637483 wrote:I mean you're a great poster writer, but if you dont wanna be a Browns fan, then don't lol don't get on here and whine to us about the organization.

Reading is fundamental. I never said I didn't want to be a fan.
Jan 13, 2011 11:26pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
Jan 13, 2011 11:30 PM
shook_17;637603 wrote:well i guess the good thing is he isn't calling the plays. im willing to bet gil haskell will be our OC. who was john harbaugh before he was hired? who was mike smith before he went to atlanta? i had no idea. im putting all my faith into this front office. we are going to have stability for once. im excited for pat shurmur to see what he can do what colt mccoy. i just hope hes got fire in his belly. im tired of these lame duck coaches. personality wise.

on a side note. why did they have eric mangini on espn to anyalize the hiring of pat shurmur? i mean eric won me over hands down, the first year i didn't trust him but he def had this team on the right track. just wrong place wrong time.. but eric is a stand up guy, he had nothing but good to say about the browns organization and our front office.

Actually, the word is that Shurmur IS going to be calling the plays. An OC would be used for game planning and assist, but would not be the primary one calling plays. That will be the head coach. It's being reported by Jim Donovan, sportscaster out of Cleveland.
Jan 13, 2011 11:30pm
bases_loaded's avatar

bases_loaded

Senior Member

6,912 posts
Jan 13, 2011 11:33 PM
Is Donovan on CBS 19? 19 is shit for sports news.
Jan 13, 2011 11:33pm
THE4RINGZ's avatar

THE4RINGZ

R.I.P Thread Bomber

16,816 posts
Jan 13, 2011 11:34 PM
Donovan is on 3.
Jan 13, 2011 11:34pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jan 14, 2011 2:23 AM
Yeah, Donovan is WKYC 3 and also STO.
Jan 14, 2011 2:23am
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jan 14, 2011 2:27 AM
As for the hire, I actually like it.

If you followed the sports talk or twitter feeds from the time of the announcement on, it was nothing but high regards for Shurmur.

He seems like a very intelligent guy and a great football mind. He's also great with QB's, which is good news for Colt McCoy.

As for the rebuilding remarks, eh..

We've been rebuilding, but we're still only a good offseason away. Switching to a 4-3 isn't a big deal, as our defense as is, is probably better equipped for a 4-3 anyway. Rogers and Rubin could both line up at DT then and our LB's aren't blitzing LB's anyway.

We've seen before though that team with even worse records than the Browns, have hired completely new staffs and turned it around the next season, some even making the playoffs.
Jan 14, 2011 2:27am
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Jan 14, 2011 5:20 AM
SportsAndLady;637483 wrote:I mean you're a great poster writer, but if you dont wanna be a Browns fan, then don't lol don't get on here and whine to us about the organization.

i mean in all fairness to writer, it was a pretty dumb hire
Jan 14, 2011 5:20am
Red Saul's avatar

Red Saul

Senior Member

157 posts
Jan 14, 2011 6:04 AM
Does Shurmur have the same agent as Holmgren and the GM?

That might have had something to do with him getting the job here.
Jan 14, 2011 6:04am
H

HeathAlum21

Senior Member

363 posts
Jan 14, 2011 6:19 AM
Red Saul;637840 wrote:Does Shurmur have the same agent as Holmgren and the GM?

That might have had something to do with him getting the job here.

Shurmur's uncle used to be DC when Holmgren was HC. The relationship has been there for a long time (something like 40 years?) He is definitely part of his coaching tree.
Jan 14, 2011 6:19am
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Jan 14, 2011 8:47 AM
Writerbuckeye;637710 wrote:Actually, the word is that Shurmur IS going to be calling the plays. An OC would be used for game planning and assist, but would not be the primary one calling plays. That will be the head coach. It's being reported by Jim Donovan, sportscaster out of Cleveland.

i watched bruce drennan last night and he said that.. i was kinda surprised, not going to lie. but im will to bet gil haskell or even mike will help him with the offense. i mean why wouldn't they?
Jan 14, 2011 8:47am
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Jan 14, 2011 10:05 AM
Writerbuckeye;637333 wrote:I have no idea whether this is a good move or not -- and I was not a fan of firing Mangini after only two years. I wanted them to revamp the offensive coaching and leave the rest alone for the sake of continuity. Changing coaches every few years will never get you a winning team.

Now it looks like we are officially rebuilding once again.

A new coach, who will likely bring in almost all new coaches, including a defensive coordinator that is unlikely to run the 3-4. So we're REALLY rebuilding from scratch on that side of the ball.

If they can't retain Seely as special teams coach (he's likely gone since he also held an assistant coach's title), then the loss is magnified by quite a bit more, since he had Cleveland's special teams near the top of the league during his tenure.

Like all Browns fans, I want to believe Holmgren has it right and knows what he's doing here. If this turns out to be an ego move (having his guy in place instead of the owner's) or some twisted thing that came about because all these folks have the same agent, then I will likely drop the NFL like I dropped MLB about 10 years ago.
To the Browns fans of the late fifties and early 60's...this post rekindles a spark in our eyes. Extremely well written WB....and your Browns nostalgia mirrors that of my own childhood. Those that are 40 and younger....do not understand the proud history of our team.



After a while, you just get sick of the ineptitude and realize it's not worth the emotional toll. I'll always treasure the memories I have of learning football while watching the Browns with my father and grandfather, and the important part it played in our family during those years. But those times are long gone, and what has masqueraded as the Browns (somewhat) under Modell and definitely since "the return" hasn't been but a ghost of the proud franchise I grew up with.

I pretty much lost my passion for pro football overall after the Browns were stolen. Having several years without watching one second of an NFL game, really detached me from the sport. Since 1999, I've only watched one NFL playoff game (the Browns were in it, obviously) and no other playoff games or Super Bowls. So it's not like I'm heavily invested in the league, other than watching the Browns.

Honestly, I get tons more enjoyment from college sports these days than I do from anything professional, and that's not going to be changing. It's just a matter of whether I feel like investing myself in another complete rebuild or not.[/QUOTE]
Jan 14, 2011 10:05am
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Jan 14, 2011 10:21 AM
My quote feature is not working....but my responce is to WB.

Outstanding piece written..and you share the sentiments of all those Browns fans that date back to the glory years. Browns fans that are 45 years of age and younger do not always know that the Browns of the late 40's 50's and 60's were perennial powerhouses.

WB, your nostalgic references tn your father and grandfather mirrors that of my own family life. A memory that will be forever cherished... sitting with my older brother at the 64 title game....as an 11 year old kid....watching the under talented Browns destroy the heavily favored Colts on a cold, blistery afternoon.
Jan 14, 2011 10:21am