SQ_Crazies wrote: No one can say what would happen with Bosh. We've never seen LeBron play with another "A player". Bosh is an A player. But I don't like moving for Bosh, we have Jamison--why get Bosh? I think the money he would cost could be allocated somewhere else to make the team stronger.

But LeBron/Bosh would instantly become the best duo in the league.

Footwedge wrote:

SQ_Crazies wrote: No one can say what would happen with Bosh. We've never seen LeBron play with another "A player". Bosh is an A player. But I don't like moving for Bosh, we have Jamison--why get Bosh? I think the money he would cost could be allocated somewhere else to make the team stronger.

But LeBron/Bosh would instantly become the best duo in the league.

Jamison isn't half the player Bosh is. you live in a dream world.

hoops23 wrote:

Footwedge wrote:

SQ_Crazies wrote: No one can say what would happen with Bosh. We've never seen LeBron play with another "A player". Bosh is an A player. But I don't like moving for Bosh, we have Jamison--why get Bosh? I think the money he would cost could be allocated somewhere else to make the team stronger.

But LeBron/Bosh would instantly become the best duo in the league.

Jamison isn't half the player Bosh is. you live in a dream world.

He definitely is "half" the player, however in Jamisons prime he was a better player.

If Jamison was used correctly, and not tried out as a "spot up" shooter, we would have seen a much more effective Jamison.

Mike Brown used Antawn down low on the blocks against Chicago and Antawn tore the Bulls to pieces with his scoring and rebounding.

for some reason, Mike Brown felt the need to move him back out as a spot up shooter against Boston.. Antawn was out of place and ineffective.

Use the guy right, and he gets you 20 a game.

Use him wrong, he'll get you 7 a game.

That falls on coaching and placement more than it does on Antawn.

thedynasty1998 wrote: Secondly, Jamison isn't in the same league as Bosh.

Footwedge wrote: Jamison isn't half the player Bosh is. you live in a dream world.

SQ_Crazies wrote:

thedynasty1998 wrote: Secondly, Jamison isn't in the same league as Bosh.

Footwedge wrote: Jamison isn't half the player Bosh is. you live in a dream world.

Holy fucking shit.

Are we really going to do this again? Did you guys even read what I said, or did you only read "why get Bosh, we have Jamison"?

SQ_Crazies wrote: No one can say what would happen with Bosh. We've never seen LeBron play with another "A player". Bosh is an A player. But I don't like moving for Bosh, we have Jamison--why get Bosh? I think the money he would cost could be allocated somewhere else to make the team stronger.

But LeBron/Bosh would instantly become the best duo in the league.

thedynasty1998 wrote: I read what you said, and you said the money could be allocated somewhere else. The missing piece for the Cavs is a big. Sure they could use help at the PG position, but a scoring PF is the piece needed, and that's the most important piece.

I understand that you think other pieces might be needed, but the Cavs don't have the cap space right now anyways. They will have to get really creative to go out and bring in an impact player, and I just don't see that happening because I don't know what pieces the Cavs have in place that are highly coveted?

gibby08 wrote: ^^^

I don't think so

SQ_Crazies wrote:

thedynasty1998 wrote: I read what you said, and you said the money could be allocated somewhere else. The missing piece for the Cavs is a big. Sure they could use help at the PG position, but a scoring PF is the piece needed, and that's the most important piece.

I understand that you think other pieces might be needed, but the Cavs don't have the cap space right now anyways. They will have to get really creative to go out and bring in an impact player, and I just don't see that happening because I don't know what pieces the Cavs have in place that are highly coveted?

I clearly said that Bosh would be an upgrade, I mean, I said LeBron and Bosh would become the best duo in the league. But when you have Jamison, who is a very talented player in his own right, you don't NEED Bosh. You can allocate your resources into other positions and make your team that much better. Tell me which of the following you think sounds better:

1. LeBron and Bosh

2. CP3, LeBron and Jamison

See what I mean? I'm not saying Bosh wouldn't be a big upgrade, but the team could be made stronger by using their available flexibility in other areas. And I don't really think there is much of a chance of getting Bosh anyways--had we not traded for Jamison, then there would have been a decent chance.

SQ_Crazies wrote: Tell me which of the following you think sounds better:

1. LeBron and Bosh

2. CP3, LeBron and Jamison

See what I mean? I'm not saying Bosh wouldn't be a big upgrade, but the team could be made stronger by using their available flexibility in other areas. And I don't really think there is much of a chance of getting Bosh anyways--had we not traded for Jamison, then there would have been a decent chance.

gibby08 wrote: Fine..if you think it's reailistic...get prepared to send a package that would most likely look like this:

Mo Williams/Delonte West
Hickson
Another Player
2011 First Round Draft Pick

That's what it would cost for Chris Paul