posted by ptown_trojans_1
No, not a Russian asset, but has views that favor the Syrian point of view that turned out to be wrong.
She also did not believe Assad gassed his own people, when we can see that he did, especially as his regime has fallen.
I'm not a conspiracy theorists, so don't believe she is the worst that is sad about it. I just think she is unqualified and holds terrible positions on foreign policy.
This is where my views differ greatly from yours.
I see nothing wrong with the idea that the US doesn't need to make everybody's business our business - especially if diplomacy is given the chance to work.
There is this weird thing where if somebody doesn't support our involvement in war then has the audacity to not shit talk about the person involved - accusations are thrown left and right.
I'm a sick and hateful way (lol) I hope the Dems keep this crap going. I really really do. But I digress.
Disclosure: I just woke up after not sleeping well and am in my first cup of coffee. So I'm still partially brain dead and not ambitious enough to refresh my memory.
I am remembering only the tiniest amounts of the claims that Syria was gassing it's own people. I remember watching a female reporter sniffing a backpack and announcing that it stunk.
Can you list heads of intelligence agencies that, in the past 25 years that have been wrong? I can't remember names at the moment and too lazy to go look them up. But I can name administrations going back to 2001 where they have been wrong. Hell, the wrongness started before I was born.
Oh dear...