posted by iclfan2Will anything actually come of supposedly declassifying JFK, RFK, and MLK jr? Or a big redacted nothing burger?
I’m guessing nothing will come.
I don’t know much about the RFK case. But I absolutely believe JFK was killed by a single nut job who perfectly fits the profile of someone who’d do this (Oswald). I think it’s human nature to want to believe one person could cause so much havoc
Didn’t want to start a thread so I’ll just leave this here
This would be a hell of a career choice
posted by Devils AdvocateDidn’t want to start a thread so I’ll just leave this here
This would be a hell of a career choice
I just read through that whole article.
I'm wondering why the writer didn't quote the particular lines of the bill that specifically says that "all it will take is for somebody to be accused of being transgender and that person will immediately have to strip their clothes off so somebody can look at the dick or vag".
I also would like to know why a simple copy of a birth certificate can't be used.
One last thing. Certain words and phrases used by the writer are clearly ideological and not factual. For example, "CIS". I don't think the article can be taken seriously when such wording is used that is not a direct quote from a lawmaker or part of the bill's language.
posted by Devils AdvocateDidn’t want to start a thread so I’ll just leave this here
This would be a hell of a career choice
When I was in school playing sports, once a year physical was absolutely a genital/hernia check....for boys at least. I can't speak for what a female physical entailed.
posted by CenterBHSFanI just read through that whole article.
I'm wondering why the writer didn't quote the particular lines of the bill that specifically says that "all it will take is for somebody to be accused of being transgender and that person will immediately have to strip their clothes off so somebody can look at the dick or vag".
I also would like to know why a simple copy of a birth certificate can't be used.
One last thing. Certain words and phrases used by the writer are clearly ideological and not factual. For example, "CIS". I don't think the article can be taken seriously when such wording is used that is not a direct quote from a lawmaker or part of the bill's language.
Agreed. “Cis” isn’t a real thing.
https://x.com/acyn/status/1882467891012104342?s=46&t=xrxfs6mLIefacKYITrkV2A
You ever notice when trump says something that is dumb or not true he switches to that weird voice like he’s a preacher or something? Has he not heard of fire? This is another one of those things that probably sounds really smart to dumb people.
https://x.com/edkrassen/status/1882763373529407703?s=46&t=xrxfs6mLIefacKYITrkV2A
Kamala was required to give defend a phd n any policy or idea lol
Meanwhile some bad hombres are being hustled out of the country.
posted by geeblockhttps://x.com/edkrassen/status/1882763373529407703?s=46&t=xrxfs6mLIefacKYITrkV2A
Kamala was required to give defend a phd n any policy or idea lol
You do know Krassenstein is a retard, correct? Solar panel farms are not the future and people do hate them.
posted by majorsparkMeanwhile some bad hombres are being hustled out of the country.
Deporting literal criminals (not just for being illegal). The easiest thing the Biden admin and other lib cities could have done to at least pretend they cared about illegal immigrant crime. Instead they’d rather trump up ridiculous charges for capital trespassers and lock up old ladies for protesting at abortion clinics. Looking forward to them going after sanctuary cities and all of the far left dummies letting it happen.
posted by iclfan2You do know Krassenstein is a retard, correct? Solar panel farms are not the future and people do hate them.
If that is what u came away with from that post I’ll pray for you. Also I mean if it’s a video quote how does the person who posted it affect the words?. Trump is an idiot and not a serious person. He has said 50 dumb things I could post the last few days that aren’t remotely true
posted by majorsparkMeanwhile some bad hombres are being hustled out of the country.
As long an non violent ones are not caught in the cross fire.
posted by geeblockIf that is what u came away with from that post I’ll pray for you. Also I mean if it’s a video quote how does the person who posted it affect the words?. Trump is an idiot and not a serious person. He has said 50 dumb things I could post the last few days that aren’t remotely true
I didn’t watch the video. I just read Krass comment which was dumb.
Ok just watched the video, I didn’t see anything THAT wrong with it. Feel free to post him actually being stupid, that one is barely a blip. Oh he called them windmills? Got’em!
On the flip side, Trump has halted funding for the foreign aid to HIV Aids fund Pepfar.
It is one of the best programs for aids treatment and prevention in the world. Hell, even W has touted it as one of his finest programs.
It is a 90day pause, but knowing Trump, he could easily zero it out.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/24/us/politics/trump-hiv-aids-pepfar.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
posted by ptown_trojans_1As long an non violent ones are not caught in the cross fire.
There are plenty of non-violent crimes that if caught doing or if caught in one of these sweeps, why wouldn’t you want them deported?
posted by ptown_trojans_1As long an non violent ones are not caught in the cross fire.
Like Tom Homan said the best way to avoid that is to cooperate and if a violent illegal is in your custody to detain them there for ICE to pick up.
posted by iclfan2There are plenty of non-violent crimes that if caught doing or if caught in one of these sweeps, why wouldn’t you want them deported?
Not if they are in the process of getting their citizenship.....or if they have children that will be left behind that will need care.
If they are violent gangs, all for it. But, not just rounding up illegals just because they are illegal.
posted by ptown_trojans_1Not if they are in the process of getting their citizenship.....or if they have children that will be left behind that will need care.
C’mon. 0% of them are in the process of getting citizenship, and why does that matter? Here illegally and committing crimes, your status of citizenship process doesn’t matter. And the children can go with them. If you’re robbing houses, cars, stores, selling drugs, and here illegally, you can go.
I didn’t say round them up for being here illegally. Actual criminals.
posted by iclfan2C’mon. 0% of them are in the process of getting citizenship. And the children can go with them. If you’re robbing houses, cars, stores, and here illegally, you can go.
Agreed on that last part.
Im talking about some one that happens to be there getting rounded up, that has a kid elsewhere and now the kid is left without care.
Look man, I'm all for deporting the bad guys. But, let me tell you the American people will not accept deporting women without their kids or people that are non violent.
You cannot deport everyone immediately. That is fucking cruel and inhumane.
If I one is here illegally its best to not associate with those engaging in illegal activities.
posted by majorsparkIf I one is here illegally its best to not associate with those engaging in illegal activities.
LoL. That is entire parts of cities then....
So I guess some people should just not do anything or go anywhere?
What they are they supposed to do in meantime if they are going through the process?
You are being completely unrealistic.
posted by ptown_trojans_1Seriously. Do you associate with people known to engage in criminal activity? Likely most good people that are here illegally don't either.LoL. That is entire parts of cities then....
So I guess some people should just not do anything or go anywhere?
What they are they supposed to do in meantime if they are going through the process?
You are being completely unrealistic.
posted by majorspark
Seriously. Do you associate with people known to engage in criminal activity? Likely most good people that are here illegally don't either.
Not to my knowledge, but I also don't know everyone in a grocery store or market.
Again, I'm all for the worst guys getting caught up. But, it depends on where they are doing these raids.
Are they whole buildings/ apartments, grocery stories, shops, etc?
If they are targeted, I'm good with that.
I'm not for wide nets, oh this guy here who happened to be the shop is also illegal, so he is gone.
I'm for targeted raids, not wide nets is my overall point.
Targeting is being asked for. Some governors/mayors have made it a point to not cooperate. Even so I would not worry about grocery stores, whole buildings, and apartment complexes unless a known gathering of criminal activity.
New York mayor Adams said he was told to be a "good democrat" concerning the issue. What do you think that means?