Did Children Lead Healthier Lives 50 years ago?

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Serious Business ▸ Did Children Lead Healthier Lives 50 years ago?
Little Danny's avatar

Little Danny

Senior Member

4,288 posts
Feb 8, 2010 4:47 PM
I saw this questions raised in the Dispatch today. An overwhelming majority (80%) said yes. I tend to agree. Little Johnny and Susie spent all day in the summers, on the weekends and after school playing outside and exercising. They did not come home to a dinner of 2 cheeseburgers and fries from McDonald's.

What say you?
Feb 8, 2010 4:47pm
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
Feb 8, 2010 4:49 PM
I'm not sure that they ate healthier foods 50 years ago (a lot more trans fats) but they probably ate more balanced and definitely exercised more, so overall, yes, I'd say they lead healthier lives 50 years ago.
Feb 8, 2010 4:49pm
Q

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

7,117 posts
Feb 8, 2010 4:49 PM
Didn't have the gamut of anti-bacterial products, resulting in immune systems capable of fighting off various bugs.
Feb 8, 2010 4:49pm
Quint's avatar

Quint

Captain

737 posts
Feb 8, 2010 4:50 PM
Kids 50 years ago were subject to a lot more Mercury and Lead than kids are today.
Feb 8, 2010 4:50pm
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Feb 8, 2010 4:53 PM
I'd say yeah they probably did.
Feb 8, 2010 4:53pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Feb 8, 2010 4:53 PM
When you ask a brain drained state with a population that is overwhelmingly part of that generation, hell yes they're going to respond that way!

But seriously, as Krambman says: there's no way they ate healthier, but there was more physical activity to negate it.
Feb 8, 2010 4:53pm
W

wkfan

Senior Member

1,641 posts
Feb 8, 2010 4:57 PM
50 years ago......

Some positives:
More exercise
Fewer preservatives and 'crap'n prepared food
Less fast food
Less 'structure' (i.e. more time to be a kid)
More secure environment (i.e. less worries about crime, etc)

Some negatives:
More lead in paint, mercury, etc
fewer vaccines and medication to cure disease
More smoking and second hand smoke

All in all...healthier lifestyle in 1960.
Feb 8, 2010 4:57pm
BuckeyeBlue's avatar

BuckeyeBlue

Senior Member

561 posts
Feb 8, 2010 11:57 PM
I tend to agree with those who say yes. Kids in that time didn't spend their days after school in front of the television or playing XBox. The food may have been higher in trans fats, but it wasn't nearly as processed as today's food. The fast food mentality also wasn't nearly as prevalent back then.
Feb 8, 2010 11:57pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Feb 9, 2010 12:01 AM
I'd say about the same, there are more complete lard-asses now than there were then but I think the same can be said for people who are hardcore about exercising and having a balanced and proper diet.
Feb 9, 2010 12:01am
NNN's avatar

NNN

Senior Member

902 posts
Feb 9, 2010 12:14 AM
Am I the only one that questions the merit in asking people who actually still read newspapers if anything was better "back when I was a pup"?

How's that saying go...."The older I get, the better things were"?
Feb 9, 2010 12:14am
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Feb 9, 2010 12:37 AM
http://aging.senate.gov/crs/aging1.pdf

Check out page three.
Feb 9, 2010 12:37am
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Feb 9, 2010 7:39 AM
...thought this was related.

Although it may not be cause and effect this article reports an association with kids obesity and the following three things. They may also impact behavior and cognitive development in a positive manner.

1. "Regularly" eat dinner with your family

2. Get "enough" sleep

3. Watch less than two hours of TV per day


"...If it seems impossible to institute all three of these behaviors, Anderson said that any one of them alone can have an effect. ..."

I found this line sad. These are not that difficult. How could it be impossible?

http://health.yahoo.com/news/healthday/3homehabitshelpyoungstersstayslim.html
Feb 9, 2010 7:39am
rookie_j70's avatar

rookie_j70

Senior Member

677 posts
Feb 9, 2010 7:52 AM
kids today cant get any exercise due to the wussification of America. some parents try to smother their kids and keep them out of harm's way. also in school, recess and gym are being banned because it is emotionaly damaging to be decked with a dodgeball.
Feb 9, 2010 7:52am
C

charliehustle14

Senior Member

2,224 posts
Feb 9, 2010 8:08 AM
rookie_j70 wrote: kids today cant get any exercise due to the wussification of America. some parents try to smother their kids and keep them out of harm's way. also in school, recess and gym are being banned because it is emotionaly damaging to be decked with a dodgeball.
Ah, they're full of horse shit. Nothing cleanses the soul like getting sniped in the face by a 68 MPH dodge ball.

I know a lot of schools actually did away with the traditional dodge balls and use those cheap ass soft balls so no one gets hurt. I know during my sophomore year, my school got rid of all the traditional dodge balls and went with those soft ones because one kid had panic attacks whenever it came to dodge ball.
Feb 9, 2010 8:08am
Little Danny's avatar

Little Danny

Senior Member

4,288 posts
Feb 9, 2010 8:31 AM
Anyone used to play "Wall Ball"? That was a game we used to play with a tennis ball or a raquetball. The object was to throw the ball against the wall as hard as you can. The ball would bounce back to some other poor slob who wold have to either catch the ball on the fly or on a bounce. If he dropped the ball, he had to run to the wall as fast as he can. Someone else would pick up the ball and either peg the guy or throw the ball against the wall. If the initial dropper did not beat the throw, he was forced to spread eagle on the wall while everyone took turns pegging him with the ball.

It was one of the most popular games at school. We used to play in the mornings and/or at lunch. Of course, it was a game that was frowned upon by the school admin. Eventually they would ban it for a while after someone get hit in the face but after a month or so we would pick right up where we left off.

Looking back on it, it was great cardiovascular exercise, helped develop eye-hand coordination and it taught you survival skills. The ball would sting for a while and occasionally someone might get a busted lip, but no one died from it.
Feb 9, 2010 8:31am
THE4RINGZ's avatar

THE4RINGZ

R.I.P Thread Bomber

16,816 posts
Feb 9, 2010 8:33 AM
We used to play a game called "Red Rover" until it got banned. It only got banned because some chick got clotheslined on the asphalt playground.

If you remember the game you'll know what I am talking about.
Feb 9, 2010 8:33am
Little Danny's avatar

Little Danny

Senior Member

4,288 posts
Feb 9, 2010 8:34 AM
THE4RINGZ wrote: We used to play a game called "Red Rover" until it got banned. It only got banned because some chick got clotheslined on the asphalt playground.

If you remember the game you'll know what I am talking about.
"Red Rover, Red Rover, Send THE4RINGZ right over"

Yeah we played that too. Often with the same results. That was what made the game so fun.
Feb 9, 2010 8:34am
THE4RINGZ's avatar

THE4RINGZ

R.I.P Thread Bomber

16,816 posts
Feb 9, 2010 8:38 AM
Yeah there was nothing better than turning your hands so that you caught them with your forearm in the neck region. You had to be healthier back in the day just to survive some of that kind of shit.
Feb 9, 2010 8:38am
HitsRus's avatar

HitsRus

Senior Member

9,206 posts
Feb 9, 2010 8:57 AM
I think when you look at the stats for obesity in kids today and the availability of drugs in middle school and high school you have to come to the conclusion that the "general" lifestyle was healthier for children back then. I think the opposite may be true for adults. Increased awareness of risks and hazards and medical advances have led to increased longetivity.
Feb 9, 2010 8:57am
Little Danny's avatar

Little Danny

Senior Member

4,288 posts
Feb 9, 2010 9:02 AM
HitsRus wrote: I think when you look at the stats for obesity in kids today and the availability of drugs in middle school and high school you have to come to the conclusion that the "general" lifestyle was healthier for children back then. I think the opposite may be true for adults. Increased awareness of risks and hazards and medical advances have led to increased longetivity.
Hits, if I recall you are in the medical community. This may be the case now, but what do you think is going to happen to all of these unhealthy kids when they become adults.
Feb 9, 2010 9:02am
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Feb 9, 2010 9:03 AM
Yes. A simple yes.
Feb 9, 2010 9:03am
G

Gblock

Feb 9, 2010 10:40 AM
dental wise i would say no....no flouride in the water, most older people from that generation have no teeth
Feb 9, 2010 10:40am
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Feb 9, 2010 10:55 AM
Fluoride has been added to tap water for many, many decades.

More than 60 plus years I believe.

http://kidshealth.org/parent/general/teeth/fluoride.html
Feb 9, 2010 10:55am
C

chs71

Member

70 posts
Feb 9, 2010 1:48 PM
Are there more overweight children now, or fifty years ago?

Are there more mentally ill children now, or fifty years ago?
Feb 9, 2010 1:48pm
HitsRus's avatar

HitsRus

Senior Member

9,206 posts
Feb 10, 2010 6:59 AM
Probably more today in both categories, but our definition of mental illness has changed too.

I think there are some interesting changes that has occurred in our lifestyle....there are more 'opportunities' to be unhealthy as well as opportunities to choose health. By that I mean that increases in technology and mobility give our kids more opportunities to sit and be sedentary ( computers/video games/ children/teen TV programming)...and more opportunities to get into trouble with drugs and alcohol, as well as giving them more access to fast food. On the other side, there are more opportunities for athletic training and physical fitness, and better choices of food, and awareness/education.
Feb 10, 2010 6:59am