WebFire;1599511 wrote:No, it's not a professional league. And if you think it's gotten close to that, then THAT needs fixed. Not just let it go. The reason it HAS to be limited is because of boosters, plain and simple.
"Hey recruit, I am a booster from Texas. I will pay you $500,000 in exchange for a jersey if you come to our school."
"Hey recruit, I am a booster from LSU. I will pay you $550,000 in exchange for a jersey if you come to our school."
"Hey recruit, I am a booster from Alabama. I will pay you $600,000 in exchange for a jersey if you come to our school."
Is that what you want?
I don't really see the issue with that, seems like every other pro league. That just makes it more obvious that NCAA Football and Basketball are for profit endeavors.
I'm not a fan of athletics being tied to academics anyway though so that influences my opinion.
And how is it not a professional league? Look at the investment in stadiums and training as well as media deals. Look at the caliber of athletes. Everywhere else in the world, since they don't tie schools to athletics, the equivalent of NCAA Football or Basketball is a professional league. Maybe not the top tier league but not much lower.
Manhattan Buckeye;1599569 wrote:"You're upset that the NCAA makes a ton of money off of football and basketball?"
That is true to a certain level, and I agree with your general sentiment, but how many football and men's basketball programs are in the black absent a conference tv deal? My guess is that few programs actually operate with a net profit.
Don't professional sports leagues like the MLB and NFL have similar deals?