Con_Alma;1213515 wrote:This is the hope that is proving to be false hope.

we have hardly reached any long run effect. The greedy, selfish and hateful are those who fill purgatory and their redemption takes millennia.

O-Trap;1213514 wrote:Though vaguely put, that does lend something to it.

look at yourself, obviously with much toward the good,
wellspoken, usually analytical, usually tolerant, usually well mannered but with a selfish fixation for killer dogs.

isadore;1213526 wrote:look at yourself, obviously with much toward the good,
wellspoken, usually analytical, usually tolerant, usually well mannered but with a selfish fixation for killer dogs.

Pot meet kettle

rmolin73;1213529 wrote:Pot meet kettle

gosh a ruddies it is nice for you to notice i am well spoken, analytical, well mannered and tolerant. But you must have misunderstood my position I am not for but against killer dogs.

isadore;1213530 wrote:gosh a ruddies it is nice for you to notice i am well spoken, analytical, well mannered and tolerant. But you must have misunderstood my position I am not for but against killer dogs.

So am I.

if you only were it would be a step toward the good.

isadore;1213535 wrote:if you only were it would be a step toward the good.

Your fear will be overcome some day, and that will TRULY be a step toward the good.

O-Trap;1213540 wrote:Your fear will be overcome some day, and that will TRULY be a step toward the good.

to the contrary, putting myself and more importantly others in unnecessary danger is a selfish act.

isadore;1213456 wrote:yes there is for you,

I believe you can still be redeemed.

sleeper;1213547 wrote:I believe you can still be redeemed.

so we each have hope for the other, how nice.

isadore;1213545 wrote:to the contrary, putting myself and more importantly others in unnecessary danger is a selfish act.

I agree, which is why you should never let your child drive until they move out of your home. It's also why you should NEVER, EVER own a Pomeranian. As long as we're talking unnecessary risk to any degree, you should never own a dog. It's best for those around you. Taking your family on an airplane is probably a bad idea, as well.

In fact, this will ensure zero unnecessary risk: Pad your walls. Stay in only one-level homes. These are ways to avoid unnecessary danger.

I hope that I have helped you, in some small way, to ensure that your quest for perfect safety for you and your family is furthered.

Cheers!

O-Trap;1213552 wrote:I agree, which is why you should never let your child drive until they move out of your home. It's also why you should NEVER, EVER own a Pomeranian. As long as we're talking unnecessary risk to any degree, you should never own a dog. It's best for those around you. Taking your family on an airplane is probably a bad idea, as well.

In fact, this will ensure zero unnecessary risk: Pad your walls. Stay in only one-level homes. These are ways to avoid unnecessary danger.

I hope that I have helped you, in some small way, to ensure that your quest for perfect safety for you and your family is furthered.

Cheers!

gosh a ruddies I have already made a major step toward removing unnecessary danger from my community by not having a killer dog.

isadore;1213557 wrote:gosh a ruddies I have already made a major step toward removing unnecessary danger from my community by not having a killer dog.

That's a good thing. I've never met a killer dog, but I assume that if I was to meet one, I wouldn't want him in my community.

I hope you continue. I hope you don't settle with your current efforts and you aspire to the ones I've mentioned. Several of them prove to be VERY dangerous, especially teenage drivers and stairways.

I trust that you will surge toward protecting your family. Based on your criteria for acceptable risk, I would hope that you would do your best to implement my suggestions. I hope that it will further redeem you in your humanity.

But in either case, I can certainly hope for your further redemption in all aspects.

O-Trap;1213560 wrote:That's a good thing. I've never met a killer dog, but I assume that if I was to meet one, I wouldn't want him in my community.

I hope you continue. I hope you don't settle with your current efforts and you aspire to the ones I've mentioned. Several of them prove to be VERY dangerous, especially teenage drivers and stairways.

I trust that you will surge toward protecting your family. Based on your criteria for acceptable risk, I would hope that you would do your best to implement my suggestions. I hope that it will further redeem you in your humanity.

But in either case, I can certainly hope for your further redemption in all aspects.

gosh, you may not have been aware that there is one type of dog that kills more than any other type. it would be unnecesssarily dangerous to bring this type of dog into your home. Especially when there are other types of dog that have no record of killing humans, nada.

isadore;1213567 wrote:gosh, you may not have been aware that there is one type of dog that kills more than any other type.

As long as any dog kills, there will always be one type of dog that kills more than any other type. It's unfortunate, but two species trying to coexist will always have problems one way or the other, even when they are as wonderful as dogs with humans.

isadore;1213567 wrote: it would be unnecesssarily dangerous to bring this type of dog into your home.

Ah, but far less unnecessarily dangerous than allowing children to drive or owning a home with stairs. Dogs as a whole, all breeds included, are very safe across all breeds, particularly in light of most daily functions of human beings. It's why any type of dog makes a wonderful pet.

isadore;1213567 wrote:Especially when there are other types of dog that have no record of killing humans, nada.

What breeds might those be? Certainly not Pomeranians, who at under ten pounds, have killed before.

There are zero types of cars that have no connection to the death of people, to my knowledge anyway. There are homes without stairs that have resulted in zero deaths from falling down stairs ... a tad redundant, but of course true.

Human responsibility, caution, and safety is key to managing life's hazards. And I would much rather my children grow up with a good and loving companion who is extremely safe compared to most of human beings' day-to-day activities.

Rest assured, I would never suggest that someone be forced to want their own children to experience the same joy and advantages of such a companion. They are free people, and that means they are free to put their own fears above the wonderful relationship their children and family might form with such a wonderful creature. It might seem a bit selfish to put one's own fear before his or her family's joy, but you know, that's what makes America a wonderful place. We have the right to work out our fear over time.

I hope that a fuller view of the world awaits you, as you someday embrace God's creation in a truer, more real sense.

I am of a strong belief that you will be further redeemed in the years ahead.

Cheers!

Get back on topic you fucking numb nuts. This is about what you would do if you ran this site not what you would do if you had a jar of lube a pit bull and isadore in a room by yourselves. FUCK GO FUCK YOURSELVES

I would make mcburg a super mod

mcburg93;1213596 wrote:Get back on topic you fucking numb nuts. This is about what you would do if you ran this site not what you would do if you had a jar of lube a pit bull and isadore in a room by yourselves. FUCK GO FUCK YOURSELVES

Such angst.

You're right though.

Now lighten up, Francis. I know Internet is serious business, but it's not THAT serious.

THE4RINGZ;1213599 wrote:I would make mcburg a super mod

yup.

isadore;1213530 wrote:gosh a ruddies it is nice for you to notice i am well spoken, analytical, well mannered and tolerant. But you must have misunderstood my position I am not for but against killer dogs.

I knew someone that lacks basic intelligence as yourself would have problems understanding my post. Your statement about "selfish fixation for killer dogs", is what I was referring to.

isadore;1213525 wrote:we have hardly reached any long run effect. The greedy, selfish and hateful are those who fill purgatory and their redemption takes millennia.

There's no way you can determine in the individual if long term effect has or as not been reach. You can only mad you decisions of evaluation by their actions and the actions are ones of having the opposite effect that yo are desiring.

rmolin73;1213650 wrote:I knew someone that lacks basic intelligence as yourself would have problems understanding my post. Your statement about "selfish fixation for killer dogs", is what I was referring to.

gosh you write a statement that lacks specificity then complain about the response.

isadore;1213742 wrote:gosh you write a statement that lacks specificity then complain about the response.

Can you just admit your act is a fail and move on? Thanks.

O-Trap;1213590 wrote:As long as any dog kills, there will always be one type of dog that kills more than any other type. It's unfortunate, but two species trying to coexist will always have problems one way or the other, even when they are as wonderful as dogs with humans.



Ah, but far less unnecessarily dangerous than allowing children to drive or owning a home with stairs. Dogs as a whole, all breeds included, are very safe across all breeds, particularly in light of most daily functions of human beings. It's why any type of dog makes a wonderful pet.



What breeds might those be? Certainly not Pomeranians, who at under ten pounds, have killed before.

There are zero types of cars that have no connection to the death of people, to my knowledge anyway. There are homes without stairs that have resulted in zero deaths from falling down stairs ... a tad redundant, but of course true.

Human responsibility, caution, and safety is key to managing life's hazards. And I would much rather my children grow up with a good and loving companion who is extremely safe compared to most of human beings' day-to-day activities.

Rest assured, I would never suggest that someone be forced to want their own children to experience the same joy and advantages of such a companion. They are free people, and that means they are free to put their own fears above the wonderful relationship their children and family might form with such a wonderful creature. It might seem a bit selfish to put one's own fear before his or her family's joy, but you know, that's what makes America a wonderful place. We have the right to work out our fear over time.

I hope that a fuller view of the world awaits you, as you someday embrace God's creation in a truer, more real sense.

I am of a strong belief that you will be further redeemed in the years ahead.

Cheers!

Man does not co-exist with many types of animals that kill humans. When one type of animal such as the pit bull has such a proclivity for killing us we have in the past taken action to remove that animal from our presence. And with dogs there are so many types of dogs that have no record of killing humans. We should if we flying use the airline with best safety record, build stairs that are the least dangerous design, and pick dogs species that are less likely to kill us. Many types corgis, to beagles to bassets have no records of killing people as far as I know. It is an example of human responsibility not to bring the most deadly type of dog into your home or community.
Please think of the children and abandon your selfish fixation with these dangerous beasts.
Hoping for a safe future for you and yours..

like_that;1213760 wrote:Can you just admit your act is a fail and move on? Thanks.

Sorry my conscience will not allow me to admit to a lie.