thedynasty1998 wrote:
I honestly don't think Oregon is better athletically than OSU. I just think that OSU's bland offense might be their downfall.
As for Iowa and Penn State's defenses, I'm sorry, but I think the Big 10 is horrible. That is why their defensive statistics look impressive. When Penn State is one of the best in the Big 10, I have doubts about the overall strength of the conference considering how bad they looked at times, and the pathetic schedule they played.
I don't think you can say that the Oregon defense didn't see more explosive offenses throughout the year can you? You had USC, Oregon State, Stanford, Arizona and Washington. All of those teams can score, and I'm probably missing someone.
It's obviously two teams of contrasting styles. One that wants to up the tempo and outscore you. The other is ball control, slow down the game and rely on your defense. I don't know which one is right, but considering the Big 10's recent record in Bowl games I think the Big 10 might be outdated.
But maybe this is the year when it all turns around.
How is it that OSU's offense is bland when its very similar to Oregon's? Just because Oregon has to score 30+ and consistently have their offense in attack mode because of their lack of defense.
Masoli only has 238 yards more passing that Pryor on 27 more attempts. Yards per throw are almost identical 7.25 and 7.09.
Pryor has more TD's but with 5 more INT's which have been limited in the big games (1 in the last 3). Masolia has a 5.0 higher Passer Rating.
The running games are very similar but Oregon had 1 main back this year with James instead of split carries with Saine and Herron for OSU. Masoli and Pryor have similar yards with Masoli getting the ball more near the goal line for TD's.
These offenses are very similar with one main difference. OSU's defense lets Tressel put OSU's offense into slow down mode (Wisky, UM, PSU etc.) while Oregon's defense contiunally has the offense coming onto the field with a mindset of either getting a little cushion or coming from behind.