2021 NFL Season thread

Ironman92 Administrator
56,729 posts 168 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 10:18 PM

If I was a Chargers fan I’d be relieved they aren’t up 23-13

I hope their kicker misses a GW FG and tells them to eff off

Ironman92 Administrator
56,729 posts 168 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 10:45 PM

26-13

Well 🤷🏻‍♂️


I want these behind the scenes analytic guys to answer the tough questions from the media

33,369 posts 133 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 11:18 PM

You can’t look at analytics after the fact. They went 3 times. They got 0 TD (but long fields vs Chiefs helping D also). If they kick 3 FGs that’s 9 pts. Honestly… big deal when the return value could’ve been 21 which is a plus 12. Even going 1/3 which I think is reasonable expectations for the situations is a -2 bet return. They were ALL the right call. FGs are how you lose. 

Ironman92 Administrator
56,729 posts 168 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 11:19 PM

Run on 1st down 

Ironman92 Administrator
56,729 posts 168 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 11:19 PM

Careful ….don’t go too fast

Ironman92 Administrator
56,729 posts 168 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 11:20 PM
posted by Laley23

You can’t look at analytics after the fact. They went 3 times. They got 0 TD (but long fields vs Chiefs helping D also). If they kick 3 FGs that’s 9 pts. Honestly… big deal when the return value could’ve been 21 which is a plus 12. Even going 1/3 which I think is reasonable expectations for the situations is a -2 bet return. They were ALL the right call. FGs are how you lose. 

We disagree.


Ironman92 Administrator
56,729 posts 168 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 11:22 PM

Piss poor clock management 

Ironman92 Administrator
56,729 posts 168 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 11:23 PM

Man I’m rooting for a long GW FG

Kelce or Hill will be open

mhs95_06 Senior Member
8,603 posts 13 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 11:28 PM







I agree with all the kick or go for it decisions on 4th down that both teams made.,

mhs95_06 Senior Member
8,603 posts 13 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 11:31 PM

Execution not too good on some plays like Mahomes and the non QB throw bad passes nose down into the ground on critical downs.  A fun game to watch.

justincredible Honorable Admin
37,969 posts 250 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 11:34 PM

Kelce with a UC celebration. Nice. 

Ironman92 Administrator
56,729 posts 168 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 11:35 PM

Ha ha

I’ve not watched very many games where I could say this…..but the officiating was excellent


Hope they miss the playoffs

Ironman92 Administrator
56,729 posts 168 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 16, 2021 11:37 PM

Man Mahomes missed a lot of throws tonight….in great conditions. Chargers let them off the hook

33,369 posts 133 reps Joined Nov 2009
Fri, Dec 17, 2021 12:02 AM
posted by Ironman92

We disagree.

I mean, that’s fine. I was actually off. Forgot they got a TD on one. Do you have anything other than gut or eye test to go off of though? It’s very easy to be critical when the plays don’t work, and act like the missed 3 points cost them a game like it would play out the same.

They came out a -2 on the night. If you would seriously settle for 9 points when the alternative is potentially 21 I think you’re nuts. And that’s not counting the possession with the fumble which would be 12/28 depending on what they did. And if they converted that 4th and goal, they come out a net +2 (14 to 12). I just don’t see how it’s a debate, but whatever.

Thinking the game plays out the same is stupid. Do they get that INT if Chiefs aren’t backed up? So that’s an instance where the failed 4th had the flip side benefit to a long field. 

Ironman92 Administrator
56,729 posts 168 reps Joined Nov 2009
Fri, Dec 17, 2021 12:12 AM
posted by Laley23

I mean, that’s fine. I was actually off. Forgot they got a TD on one. Do you have anything other than gut or eye test to go off of though? It’s very easy to be critical when the plays don’t work, and act like the missed 3 points cost them a game like it would play out the same.

They came out a -2 on the night. If you would seriously settle for 9 points when the alternative is potentially 21 I think you’re nuts. And that’s not counting the possession with the fumble which would be 12/28 depending on what they did. And if they converted that 4th and goal, they come out a net +2 (14 to 12). I just don’t see how it’s a debate, but whatever.

Thinking the game plays out the same is stupid. Do they get that INT if Chiefs aren’t backed up? So that’s an instance where the failed 4th had the flip side benefit to a long field. 

Yeah I do…I’m just not screaming from the rooftops. The last 6 games the Chiefs have given up 17 or fewer points….the last 3 games allowed under 10 each. This isn’t the Big 12 defense. 4th and 5 you go for it to start the game when you know nothing about how the game will play out as there are 57 minutes left, might win by 40 might lose by 40. Take the 3 and get the initial edge. 4th and 1, fine go if you want, 4th and 1 after struggling in short plays, kick the 45 yard FG to make 17-10.

Then in the 4th with about 9-10 min left they score a TD to go up 20-13, then they kick the XP??? Why? Why not try to go up 2 possessions in the 4th qtr? Was that decision based off analytics or based off their struggle for much of the game from the 2 1/2 yard line?

Kicking that XP negated the consistent aggressiveness that I didn’t fully agree with.


33,369 posts 133 reps Joined Nov 2009
Fri, Dec 17, 2021 12:24 AM

You kick the PAT there to force the other team to need to convert a 2pt conversion. If you are down 14, score a TD, always go for 2. 

Ironman92 Administrator
56,729 posts 168 reps Joined Nov 2009
Fri, Dec 17, 2021 2:16 AM
posted by Laley23

You kick the PAT there to force the other team to need to convert a 2pt conversion. If you are down 14, score a TD, always go for 2. 

So if you are down 14-0 in the first and you score a TD, always go for 2?

I’d recommend the analytics guys come up with more effective play calls to start the game.


Al Bundy Senior Member
4,526 posts 40 reps Joined Nov 2009
Fri, Dec 17, 2021 6:11 AM

If you are always going to go for it on 4th & 6 early in the game because 6 points > 3 points, why wouldn't you always go for the 2-point conversation early in the game? It is basically like going for 4th & 2 with the chance to get double the points.

33,369 posts 133 reps Joined Nov 2009
Fri, Dec 17, 2021 10:23 AM
posted by Al Bundy

If you are always going to go for it on 4th & 6 early in the game because 6 points > 3 points, why wouldn't you always go for the 2-point conversation early in the game? It is basically like going for 4th & 2 with the chance to get double the points.

I personally would go for 2 everytime. But the thought process is that 7 is 4 more than 3. 2 is only 1 more than 1. The risk reward isnt nearly as large. 

33,369 posts 133 reps Joined Nov 2009
Fri, Dec 17, 2021 10:26 AM
posted by Ironman92

So if you are down 14-0 in the first and you score a TD, always go for 2?

I’d recommend the analytics guys come up with more effective play calls to start the game.


No, sorry. Not early. You do it late, like starting in the 4th. Thought process is you need 3 unanswered scores to win. If you can convert the first one, you only need 2. If you fail but convert the second, you are tied and still need that 3rd score. If you fail on both, you still need that 3rd score anyway. 

The goal SHOULDNT be to simply get to OT when down 14 (or whatever number). It should be to minimize the times you need to score to win. Getting to OT just makes it a 50% probability you win or lose. Wouldnt you rather go for 2 twice hoping to convert first, with the backup of the second time and at worst need to get a last minute 3rd score. 

Login

Register

Already have an account? Login