In other news, I believe Puff Puff Gordon will be applying for reinstatement today.

BR1986FB;1872439 wrote:Yeah, maybe the Browns could put a real 'stud" QB, like JT Barrett (rolls eyes) out there, Buckeye Boy?

Take a closer look at his avatar. He's an anti-Buckeye troll who's really an embarrassment to trolls everywhere.

Heretic;1872442 wrote:Take a closer look at his avatar. He's an anti-Buckeye troll who's really an embarrassment to trolls everywhere.

Damn.....thought he was a Buckeye honk. I'm a Buckeye fan but nothing pisses me off more than when an OSU homer hates on a Wolverine or a Domer once they get drafted by the Browns because of where they played. Once they are wearing Brown & Orange, doesn't matter where they're from. Kizer probably took liberties with his sister.

KnightRyder;1872430 wrote:if kizer throws it 50 times you can put this one in "L" column. now that i give it more thought if kizer is even on the field the browns will lose

vball10set;1872434 wrote:shut up

kizer permanente;1872435 wrote:Can we put you in the thread banned column?

Heretic;1872442 wrote:Take a closer look at his avatar. He's an anti-Buckeye troll who's really an embarrassment to trolls everywhere.

yeah, I agree with kizer permanente here---KnightRyder's only here to troll. Period.

BR1986FB;1872443 wrote: Kizer probably took liberties with his sister.

what makes you say that?

Browns currently only have 52 players on the roster...

Who did they drop?

slingshot4ever;1872587 wrote:Who did they drop?

They shuffled two players (added two, dropped two) from the practice squad. I believe the open spot is from Coleman's injury.

BR1986FB;1872443 wrote:Damn.....thought he was a Buckeye honk. I'm a Buckeye fan but nothing pisses me off more than when an OSU homer hates on a Wolverine or a Domer once they get drafted by the Browns because of where they played. Once they are wearing Brown & Orange, doesn't matter where they're from. Kizer probably took liberties with his sister.

i'm a life long browns fan, but unlike many i dont just call a player great because he is wearing a orange helmet. i have noticed most browns fan dont see what they are looking at. with kizer i see a guy that has no instincts in the pocket, that is something that cant be taught, he makes bad decision which explains why he has more ints than touchdowns. i see here the same crap by the same posters that defended manziel.

KnightRyder;1872603 wrote:i'm a life long browns fan, but unlike many i dont just call a player great because he is wearing a orange helmet. i have noticed most browns fan dont see what they are looking at. with kizer i see a guy that has no instincts in the pocket, that is something that cant be taught, he makes bad decision which explains why he has more ints than touchdowns. i see here the same crap by the same posters that defended manziel.

Kindly get bent.

KnightRyder;1872603 wrote:i'm a life long browns fan, but unlike many i dont just call a player great because he is wearing a orange helmet. i have noticed most browns fan dont see what they are looking at. with kizer i see a guy that has no instincts in the pocket, that is something that cant be taught, he makes bad decision which explains why he has more ints than touchdowns. i see here the same crap by the same posters that defended manziel.

Kizer has a few more tools to work with than Manziel. Manziel was a "hope we get lucky with this guy" scenario. Kizer has all of the physical tools to be good. Just needs to correct some things. I'm not ready to trash a 21 year old kid after two starts.

KnightRyder;1872603 wrote:i'm a life long browns fan, .

LOL, no.

BR1986FB;1872608 wrote:Kizer has a few more tools to work with than Manziel. Manziel was a "hope we get lucky with this guy" scenario. Kizer has all of the physical tools to be good. Just needs to correct some things. I'm not ready to trash a 21 year old kid after two starts.

it takes more than physical tools to be a good NFL qb. there are a host of qbs that busted that had all the tools of kizer. as Muhammad Ali would say " the mans a bum" another thing i aint buying that migraine crap the browns put out there, i know too many people who suffer from migraines to believe that nonsense

KnightRyder;1872603 wrote:i'm a life long browns fan, but unlike many i dont just call a player great because he is wearing a orange helmet. i have noticed most browns fan dont see what they are looking at. with kizer i see a guy that has no instincts in the pocket, that is something that cant be taught, he makes bad decision which explains why he has more ints than touchdowns. i see here the same crap by the same posters that defended manziel.

One of the greatest "instincts" in a pocket for a qb to have is footwork and the ability to step up and move in the pocket. Kizers footwork is impeccable and the best of any qb in this draft. So... yeah.. you don't know what you're talking about.

SportsAndLady;1872607 wrote:Kindly get bent.

This, but not kindly

kizer permanente;1872614 wrote: So... yeah.. you don't know what you're talking about.

...and he continues to validate it

kizer permanente;1872614 wrote:One of the greatest "instincts" in a pocket for a qb to have is footwork and the ability to step up and move in the pocket. Kizers footwork is impeccable and the best of any qb in this draft. So... yeah.. you don't know what you're talking about.

thats the stupid thing i have ever read, when you look at kizer , does he understand pass protection, does he understand blitz's no , his sack total will tell that much. when he is in the pocket do you ever see feels slides moves throws, hell no! his footwork is basically stand and get sacked,. there is nothing in his skillset that transitions to the nfl. maybe you need to leave football to people that know a little something about it. maybe you should try quilting or baking

vball10set;1872616 wrote:This, but not kindly



...and he continues to validate it

from the guy that said OSU would wax clemson

KnightRyder;1872620 wrote:thats the stupid thing i have ever read, when you look at kizer , does he understand pass protection, does he understand blitz's no , his sack total will tell that much. when he is in the pocket do you ever see feels slides moves throws, hell no! his footwork is basically stand and get sacked,. there is nothing in his skillset that transitions to the nfl. maybe you need to leave football to people that know a little something about it. maybe you should try quilting or baking

Of course he does, idiot. What do you think he's doing when he's motioning for blocking protections pre snap. He gets sacked because he holds onto the ball too long waiting for our receivers to get open who will never get open. It's just as much on them as him. He constantly steps up, and more importantly, not prematurely to tip off the d line so they maintain their rush behind him. youre clearly not in any position to debate this given your garbage takes. If we had good wr's this wouldn't be an issue. The line is doing their job and he is extending the time in the pocket. Eventually he's going to have to accept his receivers won't get open and yes he's going to have to get rid of the ball. If he's on nearly any other team who has a decent receiving corp, the sacks don't happen as he has someone to throw it to.

KnightRyder;1872620 wrote:thats the stupid thing i have ever read, when you look at kizer , does he understand pass protection, does he understand blitz's no , his sack total will tell that much. when he is in the pocket do you ever see feels slides moves throws, hell no! his footwork is basically stand and get sacked,. there is nothing in his skillset that transitions to the nfl. maybe you need to leave football to people that know a little something about it. maybe you should try quilting or baking

kizer permanente;1872630 wrote:Of course he does, idiot.

pretty much sums it up

kizer permanente;1872630 wrote:Of course he does, idiot. What do you think he's doing when he's motioning for blocking protections pre snap. He gets sacked because he holds onto the ball too long waiting for our receivers to get open who will never get open. It's just as much on them as him. He constantly steps up, and more importantly, not prematurely to tip off the d line so they maintain their rush behind him. youre clearly not in any position to debate this given your garbage takes. If we had good wr's this wouldn't be an issue. The line is doing their job and he is extending the time in the pocket. Eventually he's going to have to accept his receivers won't get open and yes he's going to have to get rid of the ball. If he's on nearly any other team who has a decent receiving corp, the sacks don't happen as he has someone to throw it to.

he holds the ball to long because he cant read coverage , even when he only has to receivers in pattern, he rarely steps because he doesnt feel pressure thats why he is always getting sacked he is like a statues in the pocket with pigeons roosting on him. it quite obvious you dont watch much football or probably never played the game. you need to contact the idiot whisperer maybe he can help you. only fool would say a qb that gets sacked 5 times a game has impeccable footwork . not to mention how many ints does he have vs tds? i'm sure all the great qbs throw picks at the rate he is.

vball10set;1872634 wrote:pretty much sums it up

too stupid to know you are stupid

KnightRyder;1872672 wrote:he holds the ball to long because he cant read coverage , even when he only has to receivers in pattern, he rarely steps because he doesnt feel pressure thats why he is always getting sacked he is like a statues in the pocket with pigeons roosting on him. it quite obvious you dont watch much football or probably never played the game. you need to contact the idiot whisperer maybe he can help you. only fool would say a qb that gets sacked 5 times a game has impeccable footwork . not to mention how many ints does he have vs tds? i'm sure all the great qbs throw picks at the rate he is.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GLP2DNQOCxs

even when sizzle stripped him it was a coverage sack. His drop back and step up footwork were impeccable. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. He never stands still in a pocket. I'm now convinced you haven't watched a single game and in fact are just a troll. Move along.

Daryl Ruiter
✔ @RuiterWrongFAN Hue Jackson won't say if Myles Garrett will play Sunday but "significant progress being made" #Browns




✔

@OptimumScouting
NFL source believes it's "better than 50/50" Josh Gordon gets reinstated this year.

Still far from a lock. We could learn more this week.
3:46 PM - Sep 20, 2017

I read that Gordon leaves the rehab facility tomorrow.

kizer permanente;1872674 wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GLP2DNQOCxs

even when sizzle stripped him it was a coverage sack. His drop back and step up footwork were impeccable. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. He never stands still in a pocket. I'm now convinced you haven't watched a single game and in fact are just a troll. Move along.

it may have been a coverage sack , that is open for debate, yet he had more than enough time got rid of the ball, but he has no concept of the pressure around him got stripped , he always stands in the pocket like he is encased in cement. he was the main reason ND only won four games last season. thanks for playing