O-Trap;1757115 wrote:Only inasmuch as you want it to be. Also, this sentence is awkwardly stated. You might want to work on that.
Why are you calling anyone a separate race? Humans are a race. Any grouping or classification therein is not a separate race.
And again, I pulled out an offensive comparison to demonstrate that your line of reasoning is what leads to the unjust classification of entire segments of the population. You've compared me to the Nazis (Reductio ad Hitlerum, but whatever), but it's interesting how you think an inadequate sample can be used to define the whole, which is precisely what they did with not only the Jews, but any people group they decided (based on a too-small sample) were preventing human progress. You set a dangerous precedent with your insistence that an entire population can be defined by an action or characteristic that is only present in an insufficient sample.
Perhaps I should have, as it appears you've again missed the forest for the trees. I trust that your density is intentional.
No, I used black people. They're as American as you or I. And I picked them because I knew you'd object to the conclusion, which is the correct response. However, the conclusion was only reached by applying your own logical construct. By the same extension, we can essentially treat every segmentation ... slice it however you like ... according to their stereotypes. If we assert that your logical construct is accurate, which would suggest that pitbull breeds are killers, we'd also have to assume that all white people are superficial (See what I did there?), all the elderly are terrible with electronics, all dads are blithering idiots, all people who live in Texas are politically conservative, etc.
By objecting to any of the parallels above, not to mention the first one that paralleled an inaccurate stereotype about pitbull breeds with an inaccurate stereotype about black people, you've demonstrated that you don't actually believe your own logical construct. You merely adhere to it when it suits your irrational fears, which you should really work on by the way. Maybe therapy?
Ah, but they aren't dangerous, and that has been my position all along. If anything, it is you who is comparing anyone to anything you assert as dangerous. Interesting how quickly you took a parallel involving two different subjects and quickly turned it into a comparison between the two subjects. You might want to look into why you did that.
Gosh a ruddies I guess you have a problem sending replies or you felt some psychological need to repeat your defense of the indefensible. You can twist and turn all you want, play whatever word game you wish, you made the choice to put human beings on the same level as killer dogs and that choice defined you as a person. Hopefully you have removed any pit bull from your residence. If not you have shown a selfish and cold blooded disregard for the safety of your family. <o
></o>
