DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
May 19, 2015 1:04pm
God damnit thavoice you retard. Luck is without a doubt top 10. "Espns qbr has him 11th" could be the dumbest quote I've read on here
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 19, 2015 1:07pm
I believe the QBR may have been invented/created by Trent Dilfer. Enough said....thavoice;1729664 wrote:ESPNs qbr rating has luck at 11.
The regular passing rating has Luck I think 7th of passers wtih 300 attempts or more
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
May 19, 2015 1:08pm
I just said he was the 11th rated QB, according to ESPNs QBR.DeyDurkie5;1729670 wrote:God damnit thavoice you retard. Luck is without a doubt top 10. "Espns qbr has him 11th" could be the dumbest quote I've read on here
I realize you are not that smart but damn man, do you have to be an asshole too all the time?
I personally think he is easily in the top 10.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 19, 2015 1:08pm
Use your brain thavoice. If a QB ranking metric has one of the best QBs in the league outside of the top 10, you should probably not use that metric. Ever.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
May 19, 2015 1:10pm
Not a bad idea actually.SportsAndLady;1729674 wrote:Use your brain thavoice. If a QB ranking metric has one of the best QBs in the league outside of the top 10, you should probably not use that metric. Ever.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It did have Hoyer 24th and we know easily he is a top 22 type of guy
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 19, 2015 1:12pm
Trent Dilfer. The only one dumber than Dilfer is Merrill Hoge.SportsAndLady;1729674 wrote:Use your brain thavoice. If a QB ranking metric has one of the best QBs in the league outside of the top 10, you should probably not use that metric. Ever.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
May 19, 2015 1:15pm
Throw Jaws in and you have The Three Stooges.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 19, 2015 1:19pm
Somewhere in there is a Mark May joke.Rotinaj;1729682 wrote:Throw Jaws in and you have The Three Stooges.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 19, 2015 1:24pm
This.Laley23;1729662 wrote:There is NO WAY, Andrew Luck is not a top 10 QB.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 19, 2015 1:25pm
Patriots aren't going to appeal the penalties.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
May 19, 2015 1:28pm
Saw that. I wonder if during their "back channel" talks they were having that the NFL showed the Pats all their evidence and the pats would rather just let it slide. Didnt see..doesnt that also mean Brady's appeal/sleeper;1729691 wrote:Patriots aren't going to appeal the penalties.
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
May 19, 2015 1:49pm
I think it's more, goddell and kraft making a deal, that he'll except all penalties for the team but they'll greatly reduce Brady's suspension.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
May 19, 2015 1:55pm
Then stop being such an idiot.thavoice;1729673 wrote:I just said he was the 11th rated QB, according to ESPNs QBR.
I realize you are not that smart but damn man, do you have to be an asshole too all the time?
I personally think he is easily in the top 10.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 19, 2015 2:02pm
If that's the case, then Brady should get zero games. The penalties against the team were as equally as terrible as the penalty against Brady.Midstate01;1729702 wrote:I think it's more, goddell and kraft making a deal, that he'll except all penalties for the team but they'll greatly reduce Brady's suspension.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 20, 2015 4:08am
Brady should be suspended for at least half the season. He's a fuckin cheater. The NFL coddles to the star players.sleeper;1729706 wrote:If that's the case, then Brady should get zero games. The penalties against the team were as equally as terrible as the penalty against Brady.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 20, 2015 9:06am
What does everyone think of the new PAT rule? Kick from the 15 yard line, but 2 point try stays at the 2. Defense can also now score on these plays.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
May 20, 2015 10:31am
They aren't kicking from the 15. The snap comes from the 15.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 20, 2015 10:46am
Good changes.WebFire;1729790 wrote:What does everyone think of the new PAT rule? Kick from the 15 yard line, but 2 point try stays at the 2. Defense can also now score on these plays.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
May 20, 2015 10:47am
Does anyone know what the field goal % from that distance was last year/last couple years?
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
May 20, 2015 10:52am
Would be a flawed stat regardless. Kickers will be able to kick from whichever hash they want (or the middle), as opposed to where the ball is.Rotinaj;1729832 wrote:Does anyone know what the field goal % from that distance was last year/last couple years?
However, I think they have estimated it will be from 99% to like 94.6% or something. I like the change.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 20, 2015 10:55am
93-94% for 33-34 yard FG's
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
May 20, 2015 11:02am
What makes this change good to me are the times when holding is called. Are you going to go for 2 from the 12 or kick a mid 40 yard XP? I'm assuming the XP still but it seems close.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
May 20, 2015 11:15am
I kinda figured it would stay at the 2 for the 2pt convos because of possible injuries I would think.
Early in the season it wont mean much ,but later when the weather sucks could affect the extra points being longer
Early in the season it wont mean much ,but later when the weather sucks could affect the extra points being longer
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
May 20, 2015 1:47pm
I really don't mind the changes, but I wish they'd quit f***** with game every year. Moreover, if they are going to make major rule changes they should put it out there a year in advance so teams can make personnel changes....as it is some teams are going to be advantaged and others disadvantgaged without the opportunity to make changes via free agency or the draft.WebFire;1729790 wrote:What does everyone think of the new PAT rule? Kick from the 15 yard line, but 2 point try stays at the 2. Defense can also now score on these plays.
Also, I think if you are going to make PAT's harder, then you should make going for two harder also, otherwise you are shifting the balance between them....I guess if you want more people going for 2, the changes are good, but you are changing the very core of the gamne.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
May 20, 2015 2:01pm
What personnel changes would be made due to moving PATs back?