T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Feb 10, 2015 1:22pm
Not when there is a state of the art stadium complex being built and ready for a team.....Pick6;1704720 wrote:I would bet the Rams go to the Coliseum if they go to LA.
Tony Romo named gunslinger of the year.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/tony-romo-is-skeptical-footballs-gunslinger-of-the-year/
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Feb 10, 2015 1:23pm
Not too long ago they were the greatest show on turf.friendfromlowry;1704714 wrote:Except a Rams game.
Once they get out from under that bradford contract they will be able to rebuild.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Feb 10, 2015 1:31pm
lol wut?Pick6;1704720 wrote:I would bet the Rams go to the Coliseum if they go to LA.
The only way you can even develop the thought process to say what you just did is to be COMPLETELY unaware of what's going on with Kroenke and the league and the land that Kroenke owns in LA.
Even then, to think they wouldn't build a new stadium if they moved...what the heck is (or isn't) going through your head? lmao
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Feb 10, 2015 2:50pm
It's like, my opinion man. Relax.lhslep134;1704728 wrote:lol wut?
The only way you can even develop the thought process to say what you just did is to be COMPLETELY unaware of what's going on with Kroenke and the league and the land that Kroenke owns in LA.
Even then, to think they wouldn't build a new stadium if they moved...what the heck is (or isn't) going through your head? lmao
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Feb 10, 2015 2:54pm
A shitty opinion to say the least.Pick6;1704764 wrote:It's like, my opinion man. Relax.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Feb 10, 2015 3:02pm
Let me know when construction starts.thavoice;1704765 wrote:A shitty opinion to say the least.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Feb 10, 2015 4:28pm
Ok. Will do.Pick6;1704767 wrote:Let me know when construction starts.
NFL wants to go back. They have an owner of a team who is willing to build and pay for the stadium himself. Rams put the local people on notice that they lease in now year to year so they can move any time. They have enough signatures to put on the ballot to expedite the situation with civic and environmental activists, plan to "sink" the stadium into the ground as to not be too high and then have to get approval from the FAA with the local airport......
Looking good for football in Southern California.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Feb 11, 2015 5:45pm
Bucs, have released Josh McCown.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 12, 2015 4:29pm
Future browns int thrower!HighRoller74;1705108 wrote:Bucs, have released Josh McCown.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Feb 12, 2015 4:40pm
I'd rather have him than Manziel.Commander of Awesome;1705337 wrote:Future browns int thrower!
S
sportchampps
Posts: 7,361
Feb 13, 2015 1:52am
McCown is a decent backup to have
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Feb 13, 2015 9:41am
S
sportchampps
Posts: 7,361
Feb 15, 2015 10:37pm
I can't believe Cowboys are going to let Doug free walk
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Feb 16, 2015 9:10am
I bet they resign him to a lesser deal no one else is going to pay him what he was going to make this year. His cap hit was going to be like 11.2 million this year and the owe him like 3.9 million in bonuses so they will save a little over 7 million if they don't resign him. The 11 million was just too much he is a good RT but he wasn't that great and has pretty much always been injured.sportchampps;1705838 wrote:I can't believe Cowboys are going to let Doug free walk
Hopefully if they don't resign him they can get deals done for Dez and Murray. Also I wouldn't be surprised if they draft a OT in the 1st or 2nd round of the draft.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Feb 16, 2015 5:04pm
Packers cut Brandon Bostick
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Feb 16, 2015 7:11pm
I don't agree. It can also be argued that Wilson rushing for 700+ yards opens it up for Marshawn.
Regardless their isn't any way I'd have Wilson outside the top 15.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Feb 16, 2015 7:19pm
Wilson, currently resides between 10-15 for me, with or without Lynch.
No particular order:
Brady
Brees
Manning
Rodgers
Luck
Stafford
Newton
Flacco
Ryan
No particular order:
Brady
Brees
Manning
Rodgers
Luck
Stafford
Newton
Flacco
Ryan
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Feb 16, 2015 9:08pm
I don't want to rank all the QBs, so saying out of the top 15 could be a bit ridiculous, but I agree with Sharpe's point. I have a hard time believing that numerous other QBs in the NFL would not be in back to back SBs with the roster Seattle put together. When you have a defense like that, most times you have to fuck up to lose.Ironman92;1706049 wrote:
I don't agree. It can also be argued that Wilson rushing for 700+ yards opens it up for Marshawn.
Regardless their isn't any way I'd have Wilson outside the top 15.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Feb 16, 2015 9:15pm
I'd take Romo, Rivers, and Roethlisberger over Newton.HighRoller74;1706050 wrote:Wilson, currently resides between 10-15 for me, with or without Lynch.
No particular order:
Brady
Brees
Manning
Rodgers
Luck
Stafford
Newton
Flacco
Ryan
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Feb 16, 2015 9:17pm
Agree....but so many of the top 15 QB's have stud receivers to assist their numbers which lure us to ranking them higher.like_that;1706061 wrote:I don't want to rank all the QBs, so saying out of the top 15 could be a bit ridiculous, but I agree with Sharpe's point. I have a hard time believing that numerous other QBs in the NFL would not be in back to back SBs with the roster Seattle put together. When you have a defense like that, most times you have to fuck up to lose.
I don't know where to put him....but it's top 12
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Feb 16, 2015 9:59pm
I could be talked in to to those 3 as well.se-alum;1706064 wrote:I'd take Romo, Rivers, and Roethlisberger over Newton.
To me Wilson fell in to the perfect situation, and capitalized, more power to him, and hope he gets every single dollar he can.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 16, 2015 10:02pm
Over Flacco too. He sucks.se-alum;1706064 wrote:I'd take Romo, Rivers, and Roethlisberger over Newton.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Feb 16, 2015 10:14pm
I'm not as high as others on Matt Ryan and Stafford
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Feb 17, 2015 10:09am
Besides put up inflated numbers with tons of great offensive talent around them, why should you be? It's amazing how people perceive that Dalton sucks but include these guys in the "great potential" category. Maybe it's the former top pick thing? In-terms of accomplishments, none have done anything.Ironman92;1706085 wrote:I'm not as high as others on Matt Ryan and Stafford
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Feb 17, 2015 10:14am
Because those guys are better at throwing the football than Dalton. I feel comfortable saying the Bengals would have won a playoff game by now with Ryan. Stafford, maybe, but I think Stafford is much closer to Dalton as a passer than Ryan. Stafford's got the arm strength but man does his accuracy leave him sometimes.Azubuike24;1706132 wrote:Besides put up inflated numbers with tons of great offensive talent around them, why should you be? It's amazing how people perceive that Dalton sucks but include these guys in the "great potential" category. Maybe it's the former top pick thing? In-terms of accomplishments, none have done anything.
That being said, in my QB hierarchy it's not:
Ryan
Stafford
Dalton
But more like:
Ryan
Stafford
Dalton