Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
May 1, 2014 11:57pm
Not about JFF, sorry FW. You can take you hands out of your pants now.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/former-browns-player-william-green-has-gone-from-drug-user-to-motivator-120754795.html?soc_src=mediacontentstory
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/former-browns-player-william-green-has-gone-from-drug-user-to-motivator-120754795.html?soc_src=mediacontentstory
ohiobucks1
Posts: 4,915
May 2, 2014 12:04am
I think we take Watson.
I'd rather trade down and take Evans.
I'd rather trade down and take Evans.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 2, 2014 12:07am
McShay and Kiper did a 3 round mock today alternating picks.
Cleveland came away with JFF, Bruce Ellington (WR, SC) Bradley Roby, Bishop Sankey (RB Washington)
FW hands can go back in your pants.
COA, amazingly they had 9 WR's going in the First Round.
Which naturally means like 4 will be drafted in round 1, and I'll lose the wager lol
Cleveland came away with JFF, Bruce Ellington (WR, SC) Bradley Roby, Bishop Sankey (RB Washington)
FW hands can go back in your pants.
COA, amazingly they had 9 WR's going in the First Round.
Which naturally means like 4 will be drafted in round 1, and I'll lose the wager lol
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
May 2, 2014 12:58am
Watkins? lolohiobucks1;1611826 wrote:I think we take Watson.
I'd rather trade down and take Evans.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 2, 2014 1:11am
If your boy Kiper says it's so...it must be a slammy dunk.HighRoller74;1611827 wrote:McShay and Kiper did a 3 round mock today alternating picks.
Cleveland came away with JFF, Bruce Ellington (WR, SC) Bradley Roby, Bishop Sankey (RB Washington)
FW hands can go back in your pants.
COA, amazingly they had 9 WR's going in the First Round.
Which naturally means like 4 will be drafted in round 1, and I'll lose the wager lol
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 2, 2014 1:15am
Nobody...I mean nobody had him rated anywhere near that high. The guy was injury prone to boot. Locker was not an accurate passer and ONLY Mel, had him even going in the first round.HighRoller74;1611776 wrote:No he hasn't.
Also, Kiper had Locker ranked #1 in his initial rankings for that year, as did everyone else, and through out the the year when he regressed, he was dropped down the list.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 2, 2014 1:28am
More on Locker...a career 54% completion passer with 35 interceptions and only 53 touchdowns. Pathetic. How does Kiper keep his gig?
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
May 2, 2014 7:35am
I'm finding it hard to criticize Mel if he was the only person who had him going first round and Locker went 8th. Doesn't that mean he did better with him than anyone else? Maybe I'm wrong, but his job is to predict the Draft, not necessarily who will be great.Footwedge;1611835 wrote:Nobody...I mean nobody had him rated anywhere near that high. The guy was injury prone to boot. Locker was not an accurate passer and ONLY Mel, had him even going in the first round.
And also I think everyone thought Locker would be a bust. He was all hype for years in college because of his physical tools but never had the results to back them up.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 2, 2014 7:45am
You're definitely not wrong. I also lol'd very hard.Terry_Tate;1611850 wrote:I'm finding it hard to criticize Mel if he was the only person who had him going first round and Locker went 8th. Doesn't that mean he did better with him than anyone else? Maybe I'm wrong, but his job is to predict the Draft, not necessarily who will be great.
And also I think everyone thought Locker would be a bust. He was all hype for years in college because of his physical tools but never had the results to back them up.
"Kiper is such an idiot, he was the only one who correctly predicted locker going in the first round"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 2, 2014 7:49am
So according to my sources (/BR'd), and NO ONE should anything I say as gospel, but..
-browns are throwing out smoke screens and are dead set on taking a tackle at 4
-they don't like Watkins because he loves the weed (arrested in '12), and they don't want him to corrupt Gordon.
-farmer and haslam are very well respected in the organization. Very nice people who know what the fuck they are doing.
My source works for the browns.
-browns are throwing out smoke screens and are dead set on taking a tackle at 4
-they don't like Watkins because he loves the weed (arrested in '12), and they don't want him to corrupt Gordon.
-farmer and haslam are very well respected in the organization. Very nice people who know what the fuck they are doing.
My source works for the browns.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 2, 2014 9:02am
More respected as oppose to previous regimes?SportsAndLady;1611853 wrote:So according to my sources (/BR'd), and NO ONE should anything I say as gospel, but..
-browns are throwing out smoke screens and are dead set on taking a tackle at 4
-they don't like Watkins because he loves the weed (arrested in '12), and they don't want him to corrupt Gordon.
-farmer and haslam are very well respected in the organization. Very nice people who know what the fuck they are doing.
My source works for the browns.
What does your friend do for the browns?
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
May 2, 2014 9:06am
Yeah, you know a person is completely out of his element when "proving his point" involves criticizing a guy for being the most accurate with his prediction on how a player would be drafted.SportsAndLady;1611851 wrote:You're definitely not wrong. I also lol'd very hard.
"Kiper is such an idiot, he was the only one who correctly predicted locker going in the first round"
There are a lot of Cons to the draft being held later, as I'm generally getting super-tired of all the mocks and predictions and banter and shit, but on the Pros side, Foot is getting more and more insanely stupid on a daily basis, which is entertaining as hell to me!
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 2, 2014 9:13am
Can't get me out of your head, ehh stupid fuck? Obsessed much?SportsAndLady;1611853 wrote:So according to my sources (/BR'd),
S
Sonofanump
May 2, 2014 9:23am
Changed my mind.Sonofanump;1606331 wrote:Clowney, Watkins, trade back a few spots, Mack, Bortles in that order.
Clowney, Mack, Trade back, Robinson, Watkins.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 2, 2014 9:26am
Yes opposed to previous regimes. Said chud was the worst, just the worst social skills ever. Said he probably would have kept his job but he was so awkward and never fit well with the new higher ups so they canned him.like_that;1611866 wrote:More respected as oppose to previous regimes?
What does your friend do for the browns?
Ill pm you his position when I get to a computer, I don't want to give away his identity.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 2, 2014 9:26am
Lol take it easyBR1986FB;1611868 wrote:Can't get me out of your head, ehh stupid fuck? Obsessed much?
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
May 2, 2014 9:42am
Congrats. You got him to post on the Browns thread again.SportsAndLady;1611874 wrote:Lol take it easy
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 2, 2014 9:48am
Haha. I figured that would bring him backGoChiefs;1611879 wrote:Congrats. You got him to post on the Browns thread again.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
May 2, 2014 10:02am
Assistant to the assistant traveling secretery?SportsAndLady;1611873 wrote:Yes opposed to previous regimes. Said chud was the worst, just the worst social skills ever. Said he probably would have kept his job but he was so awkward and never fit well with the new higher ups so they canned him.
Ill pm you his position when I get to a computer, I don't want to give away his identity.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 2, 2014 10:10am
Hurry up and send that pm!!!!SportsAndLady;1611873 wrote:Yes opposed to previous regimes. Said chud was the worst, just the worst social skills ever. Said he probably would have kept his job but he was so awkward and never fit well with the new higher ups so they canned him.
Ill pm you his position when I get to a computer, I don't want to give away his identity.
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
May 2, 2014 10:10am
Does anyone else on here think Clowney is going to be a huge bust?
S
Sonofanump
May 2, 2014 10:18am
No, only injury could keep him from being great.Classyposter58;1611900 wrote:Does anyone else on here think Clowney is going to be a huge bust?
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 2, 2014 10:20am
Lol I don't have to..I won't even be by a computer until Tuesday. In Ohio for the weekend.like_that;1611898 wrote:Hurry up and send that pm!!!!
When I worked at Rutgers my boss just moved there from the browns, where he was their ticket sales manager for 4 years. He gave me a contact there because I wanted to get some info on season tix and I just stayed in touch with the guy. He has a different position now though.
I'm not saying believe me because the guy probably doesn't know what is actually going on, but I just thought id share.
Not sure id like a tackle at 4 but it's better than taking Watkins IMO.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 2, 2014 10:30am
We take robinson at 4 and a QB at 26, I am willing to bet we will all be happy in a couple years with the 2014 draft.SportsAndLady;1611907 wrote:Lol I don't have to..I won't even be by a computer until Tuesday. In Ohio for the weekend.
When I worked at Rutgers my boss just moved there from the browns, where he was their ticket sales manager for 4 years. He gave me a contact there because I wanted to get some info on season tix and I just stayed in touch with the guy. He has a different position now though.
I'm not saying believe me because the guy probably doesn't know what is actually going on, but I just thought id share.
Not sure id like a tackle at 4 but it's better than taking Watkins IMO.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
May 2, 2014 10:43am
We'll be happy immediately. Esp when Robinson pwns Pittsburgh dline, Tate goes for 175 yds shoving the rock down their throats.like_that;1611910 wrote:We take robinson at 4 and a QB at 26, I am willing to bet we will all be happy in a couple years with the 2014 draft.