Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Nov 11, 2014 9:55pm
And you didn't even name Brandin Cooks, Allen Robinson, John Brown, Allen Hurns, or Davante Adams, lol. So much depth in this class.Laley23;1673560 wrote:This class is gonna be pretty ridiculous.
ODB, Watkins, Evans and Benjamin we know about.
But, when Wayne retires, Moncrief will be a beast with Luck throwing to him.
Mathews and Bryant have been pretty damn impressive as well.
Not sure whats not to like about the class. Its is deep and top heavy all in one.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 11, 2014 10:46pm
Best ever was my "meh"Laley23;1673563 wrote:I must be miss reading this post...
No one is saying this class doesn't appear to be a really Good one.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Nov 11, 2014 10:54pm
Gotcha.SportsAndLady;1673584 wrote:Best ever was my "meh"
No one is saying this class doesn't appear to be a really Good one.
Yeah, best ever is ridiculous to say after 10 weeks.
But, it has the chance to be special. There are some really good looking WRs out there.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 12, 2014 1:40am
This shows your colts bias in unreal fashion. Instead of naming cooks, Robinson, etc, you name moncriefLaley23;1673560 wrote:This class is gonna be pretty ridiculous.
ODB, Watkins, Evans and Benjamin we know about.
But, when Wayne retires, Moncrief will be a beast with Luck throwing to him.
Mathews and Bryant have been pretty damn impressive as well.
Not sure whats not to like about the class. Its is deep and top heavy all in one.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Nov 12, 2014 7:37am
At no point was I naming a list in any kind of order. Simply throwing out names off the top of my head.DeyDurkie5;1673595 wrote:This shows your colts bias in unreal fashion. Instead of naming cooks, Robinson, etc, you name moncrief
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 12, 2014 8:17am
Subliminal bias..lol
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Nov 12, 2014 9:31am
In listing him, probably lol. Since he is on the Colts, I always think of him when thinking about future WRsSportsAndLady;1673618 wrote:Subliminal bias..lol
If I were to rank them, he would be around 10th though.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Nov 12, 2014 9:45am
I didn't say best rookie class ever. I said best collective rookie season ever.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 12, 2014 9:52am
True or False: The Browns would be undefeated if they had Josh Gordon.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Nov 12, 2014 9:57am
False. They would've found a way to lose one of those. I think he may have been the difference maker in the Pittsburgh/Baltimore games but Hoyer was so epically bad in the JAX game that I don't think even Gordon could've saved him. Although, Gordon may have opened up the running game a little against JAX. 8-1, possibly.sleeper;1673649 wrote:True or False: The Browns would be undefeated if they had Josh Gordon.
Now if we were talking Johnny Football, they would've been 11-0 in those nine games. :rolleyes:
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 12, 2014 10:03am
True or False: Cleveland would be 0-9 with Manziel at QB.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 12, 2014 10:06am
False.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Nov 12, 2014 10:24am
Incomplete because I think Hoyer would've taken over, due to injury to Manziel, by now.sleeper;1673653 wrote:True or False: Cleveland would be 0-9 with Manziel at QB.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Nov 12, 2014 12:06pm
False. they played the steelers twice so would beat them once no matter the QBsleeper;1673653 wrote:True or False: Cleveland would be 0-9 with Manziel at QB.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Nov 12, 2014 12:11pm
I got that. I don't think others did based on the conversation that followed.Mulva;1673642 wrote:I didn't say best rookie class ever. I said best collective rookie season ever.
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Nov 12, 2014 1:04pm
I wouldn't say 0-9, but let's make the vast assumption that Manziel would be healthy for 9 games straight in the NFL while being a scrambler (big assumption). I'd say we'd be 3-6 or 4-5 at best right now with a rookie QB.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Nov 12, 2014 7:11pm
8-1. If you're 6-3 with the mediocre quarterback, you have to figure 1 or 2 more wins with a stud.sleeper;1673653 wrote:True or False: Cleveland would be 0-9 with Manziel at QB.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 12, 2014 9:17pm
Hey guys, why the fuck are you still on the offseason thread??
GOONx19
Posts: 7,147
Nov 12, 2014 9:26pm
Because that was the last time the Hoyer/Manziel situation was actually a debate.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Nov 13, 2014 11:35am
Except for two people. For them, it will be an eternal debate that will go on long after Hoyer is no longer a Brown.GOONx19;1673867 wrote:Because that was the last time the Hoyer/Manziel situation was actually a debate.
Next year, when the team is, say 1-3 with Johnny, nothing will be his fault. It will be all on Pettine and the front office for starting Hoyer and causing unrepairable damage to Johnny's psyche.