That would be a heck of a matchup, but I see LJ getting upset before the finals.sleeper;1164194 wrote:Looking at the bracket, it'll be an LJ/Skyhook final.
LJ by a large margin.
I don't see any bashing of this site in that post. Pretty sure that's an attack on NC Rattlesnake. Thanks for playing.like_that;1164184 wrote:http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?33012-jj-s-huddle&p=1110571&viewfull=1#post1110571
Thanks for playing.
No.ernest_t_bass;1164200 wrote:Since snotbubbles and I have tons of gay sex, can you just combine us and move us to the next round?
He posts maybe once every 3 months.Sonofanump;1164245 wrote:How did Society not make the top 16?
Some people got left out. We got a pretty good list of 16, whoever wins(LJ most likely) will be labeled "The Worst" from now until eternity.Sonofanump;1164245 wrote:How did Society not make the top 16?
rabble rabble...mcburg93;1164211 wrote:I can see this being a LJ and skyhook final but doubt it. Only problem is I think the mods stick together pretty well so I can see LJ being saved by them.
Twice.pnhasbeen;1164271 wrote:I voted for cletus.
Where is your vote? Only going to vote in ETB's matchup?justincredible;1164275 wrote:Twice.
Because Society is hilarious.Sonofanump;1164245 wrote:How did Society not make the top 16?
I'll be abstaining from voting.like_that;1164280 wrote:Where is your vote? Only going to vote in ETB's matchup?
I'll abstain you!justincredible;1164309 wrote:I'll be abstaining from voting.
Typical. Put a moderator in a competition and Justin magically "abstains" from voting.justincredible;1164309 wrote:I'll be abstaining from voting.
sleeper;1164320 wrote:Typical. Put a moderator in a competition and Justin magically "abstains" from voting.
Not a coincidence at all. :rolleyes:
If I were voting, I'd vote for a moderator in every instance. So nice try. I'm abstaining because I don't think it's a good practice for the owner of the site to be picking the "worst" members.sleeper;1164320 wrote:Typical. Put a moderator in a competition and Justin magically "abstains" from voting.
Not a coincidence at all. :rolleyes:
But banning them is okay?justincredible;1164325 wrote:If I were voting, I'd vote for a moderator in every instance. So nice try. I'm abstaining because I don't think it's a good practice for the owner of the site to be picking the "worst" members.