sleeper;1078260 wrote:Peace of mind is a mental health benefit. Lighter periods. Reduced menstrual cramps, clearer skin, less mood swings etc.

Obviously there are some downsides to taken BC, but you there are also plenty of benefits to BC as well. You said far outweigh, I'm interested if you still feel this way and if so, can you provide some backup?

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1078430 wrote:Ok.. if you don't take birth control you don't rsk the side affects of these.. http://birthcontrolsideeffects.biz/
some of which contradict your mental health benefit.

sleeper;1078440 wrote:Interesting. I'd be curious if you do this type of risk analysis for everything that you do. Like when you get in your car, do you weigh the chance that you might get into a car accident vs. taking the bus instead? I'm just trying to gain insight into how your mind works.

pmoney25;1078450 wrote:This thread has gone way off base. The issue here is not birth control, gay sex, or if you believe in God. The question is do you believe in Govt telling you what to do.

pmoney25;1078450 wrote:Again I support birth control if you want to use it. My question is when will the govt mandating our lives ever end?

queencitybuckeye;1078455 wrote:That, and if your decision involves money you don't have, should I be forced to pay for your decision with which I don't agree.

pmoney25;1078450 wrote:This thread has gone way off base. The issue here is not birth control, gay sex, or if you believe in God. The question is do you believe in Govt telling you what to do. Would you mind if the govt said every woman under 25 take birth control because you are too young to have kids? Or every guy get a vasectomy after 35? Or how about 1 child per family?

Again I support birth control if you want to use it. My question is when will the govt mandating our lives ever end?

I Wear Pants;1077420 wrote:Honestly anything that isn't specifically a charitable organization shouldn't be non-profit.

Devils Advocate;1078459 wrote: And ZWIK, A rubber has no side effects ( unless you have a latex alergy ) (( in which case I would advice a natural lamb skin)) ((( Watt... is that beastiality?? )))

jmog;1078463 wrote:Churches are charitable organizations. Not only in reality but also by law. My deduction on my taxes goes under "charitable donations".

Devils Advocate;1078461 wrote:You mean like raising a child that someone else procreated and can't afford?

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1078449 wrote:Only when the decision isn't apparent.

queencitybuckeye;1078466 wrote:If those were the only two options, you'd have a point. They aren't. You don't.

this is mandating that health insurance companies cover BC for free

sleeper;1078470 wrote:And in the case of BC vs. no BC, it isn't. Thanks.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1078491 wrote:Sure it is. It's as effective, if not more so, and without the side effects.

HitsRus;1078487 wrote:Might be one of the most naive statements I have ever heard.... Reproductive coverage is one of the most expensive services in a health insurance policy. The cost of such is reflected in the premium paid by consumers. If the government mandates this, the cost will be in your premium.

sleeper;1078465 wrote:Abortions are also legal, by law. Does this invalidate your opinion that abortion should be illegal? IWP is saying he doesn't think churches should be considered charities, and I agree with him.

jmog;1078498 wrote:Can you explain why your opinion is that churches aren't charitable organizations?

sleeper;1078495 wrote:No it isn't. It sounds like voodoo magic to me, aka not based on any science.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1078509 wrote:Just b/c you can't understand it, doesn't make it any less valid.

sleeper;1078510 wrote:Have any peer reviewed research to back up your claims?