BGFalcons82;1075906 wrote:Catholics give Dems a pass on the churches abortion stance, so they'll get over this hurdle as well. A little bloviation goes a long way.
Interesting a Paulist is all for a government mandate for forced contraception. Isn't he against federal intrusion into our lives?
He (sleeper) never said it should be mandated, he said it should be free. There's a big difference there.
believer;1076011 wrote:Screw that separation of church and state thing, right?
Ya gotta love Paulist libertarians. Big Gubmint needs to stay the hell out of our pocketbooks....unless, of course, they're paying to kill the innocent unborn to make the world safe from screaming kids. :rolleyes:
Again, sleeper said birth control should be free, not mandated. And what exactly does that have to do with killing the unborn? Nothing.
BGFalcons82;1076196 wrote:If you believe for 1 second that Dr. Paul is for federal intervention into every American's life to mandate birth control, you have absolutely no idea what he represents.
Clownball, eh? Is that how you pedsuade people to listen?
I think what he was saying is he doesn't agree with everything Dr. Paul believes, but he does still believe Dr. Paul is the best canidate (which I agree with).
BGFalcons82;1076628 wrote:No, I was merely pointing out that one of Paul's biggest cheerleader's on the OC is in diametric polar opposition to Dr. Paul's philosophy. In other words, the fraudulent one is the one that doesn't know squat about his candidate.
Free? FREE?? Nothing is free and you know better. However, if you do believe in free lunches, then you should be banging Barry's drum, not Ron's. Although, voting for Paul helps Barry, so maybe I get your point now.
sleeper even admitted he'd be willing to pay higher taxes in order to provide free birth control to people. It'd be offered, not mandated, for no charge to the person (charged to the taxpayer, which sleeper said he'd gladly pay for).