2012 Post season Bowl Ban...implications?

Home Archive College Sports 2012 Post season Bowl Ban...implications?
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Dec 20, 2011 9:52 PM
darbypitcher22;1022491 wrote:Kind of stinks that the NCAA finally went against precedence and decided to get OSU where it hurts. If they want to be consistent they need to hammer South Carolina, UNC, and Miami when it all comes down
Miami has to get hammered now. LOIC is almost a given, and their problems go far beyond the USC transgressions.
Dec 20, 2011 9:52pm
Sykotyk's avatar

Sykotyk

Senior Member

1,155 posts
Dec 21, 2011 1:00 AM
My friend (a Penn State fan) made a good point. The NCAA couldn't sit back and let OSU boot one coach and snag Urban Meyer and come out smelling like a rose. They had to knuckle down a bit. Otherwise, OSU got off real easy. One bad season and suddenly we have Urban Meyer coaching us in place of Tressel.
Dec 21, 2011 1:00am
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Dec 21, 2011 1:21 AM
Sykotyk;1022699 wrote:My friend (a Penn State fan) made a good point. The NCAA couldn't sit back and let OSU boot one coach and snag Urban Meyer and come out smelling like a rose. They had to knuckle down a bit. Otherwise, OSU got off real easy. One bad season and suddenly we have Urban Meyer coaching us in place of Tressel.
And you let him get away with it? You didn't ask him how the NCAA, the collegiate governing body, who's supposed to be fair and impartial when meting out penalties deviated from their precedence in handing down their judgement? That's not how the NCAA conducts themselves, they are fair and impartial.:rolleyes:

What did he have to say about coaches and penors?
Dec 21, 2011 1:21am
0

0311sdp

Senior Member

580 posts
Dec 21, 2011 4:04 AM
Not fair to next years seniors (no Bowl) this senior class should have been the class banned from a Bowl, it's members are the ones who committed the offenses. Because the NCAA dicked around so long the innocent will have to pay the price. (also because Gene Smith and Gee were so stupid) should have self imposed a Bowl ban this season, hell they self imposed and self reported everything else.
Dec 21, 2011 4:04am
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Dec 21, 2011 4:16 AM
LJ;1022161 wrote:I don't have a direct article, but it's all over the place right now
If Sleeper's sources concur with yours, I will believe it.
Sykotyk;1022699 wrote:My friend (a Penn State fan) made a good point. The NCAA couldn't sit back and let OSU boot one coach and snag Urban Meyer and come out smelling like a rose. They had to knuckle down a bit. Otherwise, OSU got off real easy. One bad season and suddenly we have Urban Meyer coaching us in place of Tressel.
Why should the NCAA care about who OSU hires as coach to replace Tressel? That would make them biased.
Dec 21, 2011 4:16am
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Dec 21, 2011 7:54 AM
I think Meyer should step in and suspend Herron, Adams, Posey and Thomas for the Gator Bowl.
Dec 21, 2011 7:54am
Scarlet_Buckeye's avatar

Scarlet_Buckeye

Senior Member

5,264 posts
Dec 21, 2011 8:09 AM
LJ;1022155 wrote:OSU asked them before accepting the Gator Bowl bid and the NCAA said "no ban"
Link?
Dec 21, 2011 8:09am
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Dec 21, 2011 8:25 AM
Scarlet_Buckeye;1022751 wrote:Link?
Posted 3:26 PM yesterday.
Please read thread
LJ;1022161 wrote:I don't have a direct article, but it's all over the place right now
Schad said something about it on ESPN yesterday. Also mentioned it was a split decision within in the COI on the bowl ban.
Dec 21, 2011 8:25am
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Dec 21, 2011 8:27 AM
se-alum;1022747 wrote:I think Meyer should step in and suspend Herron, Adams, Posey and Thomas for the Gator Bowl.
Why? They have served their punishment. This punishment is for the failures of the compliance dept and coaches.
Dec 21, 2011 8:27am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Dec 21, 2011 8:28 AM
se-alum;1022747 wrote:I think Meyer should step in and suspend Herron, Adams, Posey and Thomas for the Gator Bowl.
That would seem to be a fair thing to do. Though one could argue that they already served their punishment. The bowl ban is more because of Tressel.
Dec 21, 2011 8:28am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Dec 21, 2011 8:29 AM
Guess I was 30 seconds too late.
Dec 21, 2011 8:29am
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Dec 21, 2011 9:17 AM
se-alum;1022538 wrote:Miami has to get hammered now. LOIC is almost a given, and their problems go far beyond the USC transgressions.
I don't think Miami gets hammered. They aren't any good, and we all know if you aren't any good you won't get hammered. Look at Notre Dame, they are terrible, they never win anything, and subsequently they never get hammered for anything either.
Dec 21, 2011 9:17am
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Dec 21, 2011 9:30 AM
sleeper;1022798 wrote:I don't think Miami gets hammered. They aren't any good, and we all know if you aren't any good you won't get hammered. Look at Notre Dame, they are terrible, they never win anything, and subsequently they never get hammered for anything either.
And they negligently killed a kid!
Dec 21, 2011 9:30am
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Dec 21, 2011 9:30 AM
LJ;1022763 wrote:Why? They have served their punishment. This punishment is for the failures of the compliance dept and coaches.
I guess Adams and Thomas should not be punished further, but Posey and Herron are the majority of the reason that next years seniors will be punished, they deserve to miss the bowl game. The NCAA stated that this was not a compliance issue.
Dec 21, 2011 9:30am
FatHobbit's avatar

FatHobbit

Senior Member

8,651 posts
Dec 21, 2011 9:37 AM
The NCAA is a joke. OSU should never cooperate with them again. (Who turned over the emails that Tress sent?) The players and coaches who were involved will be long gone as the remaining players sit out the bowl game next year.
Dec 21, 2011 9:37am
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Dec 21, 2011 9:52 AM
se-alum;1022821 wrote:I guess Adams and Thomas should not be punished further, but Posey and Herron are the majority of the reason that next years seniors will be punished, they deserve to miss the bowl game. The NCAA stated that this was not a compliance issue.
How can it not be a compliance issue when they were punished for Failure to Monitor and for Tressel lying?
Dec 21, 2011 9:52am
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Dec 21, 2011 10:30 AM
LJ;1022858 wrote:How can it not be a compliance issue when they were punished for Failure to Monitor and for Tressel lying?
Good question.
Sankey said Ohio State's compliance office "was doing its job. It simply did not have the information it needed" when former coach Jim Tressel lied about knowing details of the tattoo-for-memorabilia incidents. "From an institutional standpoint, the committee found that the university cooperated," Sankey said.
It's hard to get over the hypocrisy of the NCAA clearing the Tat5 to play in the Sugar Bowl, and then punishing them for it.
Dec 21, 2011 10:30am
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Dec 21, 2011 10:37 AM
se-alum;1022909 wrote:Good question.



It's hard to get over the hypocrisy of the NCAA clearing the Tat5 to play in the Sugar Bowl, and then punishing them for it.
Even from that quote it's almost as if the NCAA doesn't even know what the hell it is saying. Just because they cooperated with the investigation doesn't mean they didn't have compliance problems to begin with. Tressel was required to report any and all compliance issues, he did not, in turn, the University was not compliant. The University is required to monitor all Booster activity and all athlete jobs, they did not, the Univeristy was not compliant. The Tressel thing isn't the Compliance office itself's fault, but the Booster stuff sure as hell is.
Dec 21, 2011 10:37am
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Dec 21, 2011 10:51 AM
I'm really concerned with how the COI is supposed to work. Having spoken to someone who has been on one of these type committees within the NCAA (albeit at a lower level), I believe the protocol is the same across the board. All cases are handed a number as to try to keep the identity of the school a secret to prevent any sort of bias leveled by any of the members. I believe that I was told that if you figure out who the school is, you're supposed to recluse yourself from the investigation. If that's the case, how could anyone at the Division I level ever get anything done within that committee? The media blows up all the facts in EVERY case that it would be almost virtually impossible for someone on the COI to not know who the school was.
Dec 21, 2011 10:51am
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Dec 21, 2011 10:54 AM
darbypitcher22;1022940 wrote:I'm really concerned with how the COI is supposed to work. Having spoken to someone who has been on one of these type committees within the NCAA (albeit at a lower level), I believe the protocol is the same across the board. All cases are handed a number as to try to keep the identity of the school a secret to prevent any sort of bias leveled by any of the members. I believe that I was told that if you figure out who the school is, you're supposed to recluse yourself from the investigation. If that's the case, how could anyone at the Division I level ever get anything done within that committee? The media blows up all the facts in EVERY case that it would be almost virtually impossible for someone on the COI to not know who the school was.
Um, school officials went in front of the COI, pretty sure they knew who they were
Dec 21, 2011 10:54am
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Dec 21, 2011 11:22 AM
WebFire;1022766 wrote:Guess I was 30 seconds too late.
Better than being 30 seconds early or 30 seconds total.
LJ;1022942 wrote:Um, school officials went in front of the COI, pretty sure they knew who they were
That dregree isn't working out for Darby.
Dec 21, 2011 11:22am
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Dec 21, 2011 11:36 AM
LJ;1022942 wrote:Um, school officials went in front of the COI, pretty sure they knew who they were
I heard the COI was blindfolded, and voice altering technology was used, fwiw.
Dec 21, 2011 11:36am
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Dec 21, 2011 11:40 AM
se-alum;1022978 wrote:I heard the COI was blindfolded, and voice altering technology was used, fwiw.
lol
Dec 21, 2011 11:40am
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Dec 21, 2011 11:48 AM
darbypitcher22;1022940 wrote:I'm really concerned with how the COI is supposed to work. Having spoken to someone who has been on one of these type committees within the NCAA (albeit at a lower level), I believe the protocol is the same across the board. All cases are handed a number as to try to keep the identity of the school a secret to prevent any sort of bias leveled by any of the members. I believe that I was told that if you figure out who the school is, you're supposed to recluse yourself from the investigation. If that's the case, how could anyone at the Division I level ever get anything done within that committee? The media blows up all the facts in EVERY case that it would be almost virtually impossible for someone on the COI to not know who the school was.

You are clueless about life in general, maybe you could apply for a position with the NCAA?
Dec 21, 2011 11:48am
Fly4Fun's avatar

Fly4Fun

Senior Member

7,730 posts
Dec 21, 2011 12:21 PM
se-alum;1022978 wrote:I heard the COI was blindfolded, and voice altering technology was used, fwiw.
No, no, no. They give a partial lobotomy only erasing memory about who, not the content.
Dec 21, 2011 12:21pm