the irony...i editedO-Trap;896115 wrote:Must retarded easy?
If it was easy, everyone would do it. Nothing TOO difficult, as much as it is time consuming.Raw Dawgin' it;896112 wrote:the edit explains a lot more. props to you for making cash off of this, must be retarded easy.
Same with what I do.GoChiefs;896122 wrote:If it was easy, everyone would do it. Nothing TOO difficult, as much as it is time consuming.
I'm able to split the responsibilities with my wife, so it lessens the work load a bit.O-Trap;896123 wrote:Same with what I do.
It's really not that much. I know plenty of people in my personal life that make more than that per year.se-alum;896199 wrote:Bahahahahaha.....7 people make greater than 125K! Gotta love the OC.
It's 15% of the votes in the poll, which is about correct for the income distribution in the U.S.se-alum;896199 wrote:Bahahahahaha.....7 people make greater than 125K! Gotta love the OC.
Hey, aren't you the resident carnie?I Wear Pants;896167 wrote:But seriously I'll probably make around $8-10k on the year. Which is fine by me for summer work and part time jobs during school.
I'm not sure why that would be surprising. The OC tends to be more educated and affluent than the rest of the US, and we have a number of professionals on here. It's not like $125k is some ridiculous amount of money--as QCB pointed out, it's about the 85th percentile, so in a truly random survey we'd expect about 15% to respond. Right now, it's around 18%. With small samples sizes, selectivity in reporting, and the general OC demographics, this shouldn't be surprising.se-alum;896199 wrote:Bahahahahaha.....7 people make greater than 125K! Gotta love the OC.
It's not really.justincredible;896200 wrote:It's really not that much. I know plenty of people in my personal life that make more than that per year.
I'm willing to bet what you're doing is illegal, since most of those photos are likely copyrighted.GoChiefs;896122 wrote:If it was easy, everyone would do it. Nothing TOO difficult, as much as it is time consuming.
Depends. If he's getting the pictures off a site where freelance photographers openly share, it very well may not be illegal.dlazz;896286 wrote:I'm willing to bet what you're doing is illegal, since most of those photos are likely copyrighted.
dlazz;896286 wrote:I'm willing to bet what you're doing is illegal, since most of those photos are likely copyrighted.
Yes.enigmaax;896204 wrote:Hey, aren't you the resident carnie?
Did GoChiefs ever score some free pics from you at a fair?I Wear Pants;896555 wrote:Yes.
Has some NASCAR-fan-looking-dude ever offered you sexual favors in exchange for some free celebrity pics at a fair?I Wear Pants;896555 wrote:Yes.
I'm looking at this link, which uses 2003 numbers and says that 16% of American families earn $100K or more. On our poll, I'd ballpark about 22-23% making over $100K. Considering (1) we're not a representative sample (more educated/affluent than average America), (2) these are 2003 numbers, so they're likely higher, (3) we're going to have self-selection bias, (4) we're pretty close to those numbers as it is, and (5) we're dealing with a small sample size--I think the poll numbers above are likely accurately reported. They don't jump out as immediately off-base.se-alum;896275 wrote:In 2009, 12.1% of households made between 100-149K/yr. If you just assume half(which it's probably more) are 2-worker families, than around 6% of individuals make 125K a year.
You mean an inbred?enigmaax;896575 wrote:Has some NASCAR-fan-looking-dude ever offered you sexual favors in exchange for some free celebrity pics at a fair?
