cats gone wild;507731 wrote:Wow, ........seriously, you have no clue. Go gatorbucks!
cats gone wild;508953 wrote:You've been waiting because if you had any football common sense you wouldnt need an answer. Its quite simple. You are clueless in your post. You are trying to say that the SEC is 2 teams good and the rest mediocre. Why dont you look at the final AP polls every year from the early 2000's. The SEC has plenty of teams finished ranked. The SEC has a high winning percentage in bowl games and BCS bowl games, no one compares. Each week, a top SEC team has to be prepared, because most teams from the conference can knock you off (unlike the big 10). Example.....LSU gets beat by UK and Arkansas, wins on the last drive vs. AUB and UF, and wins the title with ease that year. You dont have this deep list of teams in other conferences. And...each year its always new teams popping up in the SEC as tough teams. The SEC has FOUR different teams as champions in the BCS era with another team who got ripped off. In the Big 10, its easy to say every year "whelp, the bucks are going to win the big 10 again".
And cbf....your post is ridiculous.
Pick6;509171 wrote:Go tigercats!
haha
Pick6;509171 wrote:Go SEC!
lhslep134;509319 wrote:at least osu and florida are different conferences pick6
cats gone wild;509513 wrote:Which makes it a million times worse on being a homer. Liking teams from opposite conferences who hate each other with a passion. And oh, both teams have had recent success in basketball and football. I can guarantee you, that Ive been a fan of my teams for more years total than you have of your bandwagoning teams. And btw, my uncle played bball for USCe over 40 years ago.........should I be a fan of them this year in football? Ive had relatives who went to universities around the country, but it doesnt make me say they are my favorite team because of it. OSU, you are probably a legit scarlet goggle wearer, but UF was picked up within the last 5 years Im guessing. =homer
And your story of a paragraph up above, is what I would expect from you. Dittily squat to any relevance.
I guess if the SEC is picked as the top conference this year by every poster on this site, and every year..........its full of mediocre teams except the top 2. Riiiiiiiight, rofl! Anyways, back on topic.
Soooooo when SEC teams beat up on each other yet they still have teams ranked higher than most Big 10 teams, the SEC is no better than the Big 10 since the BCS era?sleeper;509763 wrote:The problem with the Big Ten is everyone beats up on each other so we aren't going to get a bunch of teams in the top rankings. When you play in a conference as tough as the Big Ten year in year out, then you can understand. And remember, A LOSING RECORD to the Big Ten, overall, in history, and since the BCS era.
All that, and still second best LOL
like_that;510014 wrote:I will say this. Although I think the SEC is the better conference (you can't deny the talent, just look at draft numbers), I think the Big 10 is at a slight disadvantage. Every team in the Big Ten is a cold weather team, which affects their style of play. SEC teams play in warm weather year round, and their styles are definitely more geared toward warm weather football. It would be interesting to see some of these bowl games played in the cold weather.
ytownfootball;510017 wrote:You'll never convince SEC people that this condition exists though. But the Big 10 does recruit or at least on the surface appears to recruit rough weather bodies.
lhslep134;507246 wrote:But every single year the SEC is just 2 teams and then the rest are mediocre. It doesn't matter which 2 teams they are, like you said it changes, but for anyone (including the SEC homer you are) to say that the rest of the SEC is clearly ahead of any other conferences 3-10 is crazy. Year in and year out its a bunch of mediocre teams that somehow find their way into polls at some point during the season that end up losing 4 or 5 games, not because of the "strength" of the conference, but because those teams really are mediocre.
believer;509893 wrote:Soooooo when SEC teams beat up on each other yet they still have teams ranked higher than most Big 10 teams, the SEC is no better than the Big 10 since the BCS era?
Just trying to follow the logic!
like_that;510011 wrote:Let's not forget the SEC also has more players drafted annually to the NFL.
Fixed.sjmvsfscs08;510498 wrote:
That said:
1- SEC
2 - Pac-10
3 - Big Ten
4- Big XII
5a - ACC
5b - Big East
5c - MWC
6 - WAC
7 - C-USA
8 - MAC
9 - Sun Belt
10- Notre Dame
sleeper;510499 wrote:They only maintain better rankings because most people in the south don't have jobs, so they watch a lot of football. It's just the AP playing to the ignorant masses, ever met a smart SEC fan? I know I haven't.
sleeper;510499 wrote:They only maintain better rankings because most people in the south don't have jobs, so they watch a lot of football. It's just the AP playing to the ignorant masses, ever met a smart SEC fan? I know I haven't.
vball10set;510344 wrote:just for kicks...
http://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/overall-power-ranking-by-conf