As I'm no geophysicist I'll leave the questions you asked to one. I will find a way to send those questions to Dr. Baumgardner however, somehow.

Also, to answer the easiest one, go to page 6 of this thread, you will find my post listing Dr. Baumgardner's publications, in that list you will also find this model most certainly HAS BEEN published in peer reviewed journals, as has MUCH of his work.

Tell your geophysicist to stop spewing rhetoric and actually look the crap up.

jmog wrote: As I'm no geophysicist I'll leave the questions you asked to one. I will find a way to send those questions to Dr. Baumgardner however, somehow.

Also, to answer the easiest one, go to page 6 of this thread, you will find my post listing Dr. Baumgardner's publications, in that list you will also find this model most certainly HAS BEEN published in peer reviewed journals, as has MUCH of his work.

Tell your geophysicist to stop spewing rhetoric and actually look the crap up.

I went through that list and tried to pick out where this model was referenced and this is the list I got!

in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism
in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism, R. Ivey, Ed., Creation Science Fellowship,
in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism, R. Ivey, Ed., Creation Science Fellowship

Ex Nihilo Technical Journal, 16, Vol. 1, 57-85, 2002 <---Seriously? "Journal of Creation (Previously called Creation ex nihilo Technical Journal)"

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Creationism, Technical Symposium Sessions, R. E. Walsh, ed., Creation Science Fellowship, Inc.,

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Creationism, Technical Symposium Sessions, R. E. Walsh, ed., Creation Science Fellowship, Inc.

Are you serious? That's like a pedophile writing a paper on the social benefits of child molestation and submitting it to NAMBLA for review!

They did look it up, when they said it wasn't submitted for peer review they meant it wasn't submitted to a creditable review journal!

Oh, I tried contacting the good Dr., but he never returned my email. I'm sure you'll have better luck in getting in contact with him!

Hahaha.

Nice peer reviews.

Bigred1995 wrote:

jmog wrote: As I'm no geophysicist I'll leave the questions you asked to one. I will find a way to send those questions to Dr. Baumgardner however, somehow.

Also, to answer the easiest one, go to page 6 of this thread, you will find my post listing Dr. Baumgardner's publications, in that list you will also find this model most certainly HAS BEEN published in peer reviewed journals, as has MUCH of his work.

Tell your geophysicist to stop spewing rhetoric and actually look the crap up.

I went through that list and tried to pick out where this model was referenced and this is the list I got!

in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism
in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism, R. Ivey, Ed., Creation Science Fellowship,
in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism, R. Ivey, Ed., Creation Science Fellowship

Ex Nihilo Technical Journal, 16, Vol. 1, 57-85, 2002 <---Seriously? "Journal of Creation (Previously called Creation ex nihilo Technical Journal)"

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Creationism, Technical Symposium Sessions, R. E. Walsh, ed., Creation Science Fellowship, Inc.,

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Creationism, Technical Symposium Sessions, R. E. Walsh, ed., Creation Science Fellowship, Inc.

Are you serious? That's like a pedophile writing a paper on the social benefits of child molestation and submitting it to NAMBLA for review!

They did look it up, when they said it wasn't submitted for peer review they meant it wasn't submitted to a creditable review journal!

Oh, I tried contacting the good Dr., but he never returned my email. I'm sure you'll have better luck in getting in contact with him!

Did you miss one on purpose just to continue your sensationalism or just happen to miss it?

"D. R. Stegman, M. A. Richards, and J. R. Baumgardner, "A parallel implementation of Lagrangian tracers in TERRA," (abstract) Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 80, (1999 Fall Meeting Supplement), F950, 1999."

TERRA is the model which I have stated a few times on this thread.

jmog wrote: Did you miss one on purpose just to continue your sensationalism or just happen to miss it?

"D. R. Stegman, M. A. Richards, and J. R. Baumgardner, "A parallel implementation of Lagrangian tracers in TERRA," (abstract) Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 80, (1999 Fall Meeting Supplement), F950, 1999."

TERRA is the model which I have stated a few times on this thread.

Now you just look desperate! Terra is the computer program he uses to create models! I'm sure he's used that program for several other models and submitted for peer review, but the CPT Model has not been submitted for credible peer review!