The dirt diggers will be out for this Patel guy. Meanwhile Boogie is big worried about the ambassador to France.
posted by CenterBHSFanWhat you should do is screenie your post. Then every day you can repost the novelty of the thought.
Considering that all threads regarding Trump are essentially the same people repeating the same points over and over (you leading this category), sure.
posted by majorsparkThe dirt diggers will be out for this Patel guy. Meanwhile Boogie is big worried about the ambassador to France.
Not worried at all. It’s just ironic that the guy who’s going to bring transparency and a swamp free future puts his criminal relative in this posh post.
posted by majorsparkThe dirt diggers will be out for this Patel guy.
Seems like a great pick to completely revamp the shit organization the FBI has become.
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieConsidering that all threads regarding Trump are essentially the same people repeating the same points over and over (you leading this category), sure.
Ah, so it's boring to be critical or concerned about Trump and/or his cabinet? Probably horrific to like some of his picks or Tulsi and Kennedy.
I suppose there is no formula to appease MAGA, Republicans or establishment Dems. Not that I'm trying.
As far as screenies go, if geeblock can figure it out and you can't, that's unfortunate.
posted by CenterBHSFanAh, so it's boring to be critical or concerned about Trump and/or his cabinet? Probably horrific to like some of his picks or Tulsi and Kennedy.
I suppose there is no formula to appease MAGA, Republicans or establishment Dems. Not that I'm trying.
As far as screenies go, if geeblock can figure it out and you can't, that's unfortunate.
I’m not sure I understand what you’re talking about.
I like some of his picks. I’m very optimistic about DOGE, I like RFK possibly bringing some alternative thinking FDA, and I like the idea of this Patel guy. I just like to recognize that we are still dealing with a politician who will do for himself and his cronies before he becomes the champion of THE PEOPLE like the MAGA crowd seems to believe unconditionally.
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieI’m not sure I understand what you’re talking about.
I like some of his picks. I’m very optimistic about DOGE, I like RFK possibly bringing some alternative thinking FDA, and I like the idea of this Patel guy. I just like to recognize that we are still dealing with a politician who will do for himself and his cronies before he becomes the champion of THE PEOPLE like the MAGA crowd seems to believe unconditionally.
He hires both of his father in laws but of course it will be defended on this site by those who raged about Biden enriching his family. Don’t waste your breath.
posted by geeblockHe hires both of his father in laws but of course it will be defended on this site by those who raged about Biden enriching his family. Don’t waste your breath.
I don't know gee. I think both things/sides can be true in things like that.
I think that Biden pardoning his son is the least of everyone's worries right now. If I were him, I'd most likely do it, too.
It doesn't even put a minute scratch on our government's corruption.
posted by CenterBHSFanI don't know gee. I think both things/sides can be true in things like that.
I’m not sure exactly what two things you are saying are true.
posted by CenterBHSFanI think that Biden pardoning his son is the least of everyone's worries right now. If I were him, I'd most likely do it, too.
It doesn't even put a minute scratch on our government's corruption.
I would do it for my own son too. But it’s funny that he ran around denying he would do it and saying no one is above the law. A lot of people eating crow defending him. Nice little decade long pardon that covers him for crimes he MAY have committed, probably protects sleepy joe as well.
posted by geeblockMost likely they just know you are insufferable and don’t want to argue with you because you are always right lol
Yes, you got it. Or you could just be wrong again. That’s highly more likely
posted by geeblockI’m not sure exactly what two things you are saying are true.
She’s saying one can think it’s wrong to nominate your family/get rich on the government no matter what side does it.
posted by geeblockI’m not sure exactly what two things you are saying are true.
1.) I don't think that a presidency should be familial, although immediate family involvement can't really be avoided.
2.) The presidency shouldn't be a vehicle to make family rich. People are supposed to write books and get $1/2mil per speech (lol)
posted by jmogShe’s saying one can think it’s wrong to nominate your family/get rich on the government no matter what side does it.
Winner winner chicken dinner!
posted by CenterBHSFanI guess I ll have to wait for the pages and pages of posts calling out trump then. So far the only person to do it really is boogie and he immediately gets attacked for doing so. After pages and pages criticizing Biden and going on and on about merit and DEI for last for years. Not you specifically.Winner winner chicken
posted by geeblock
I guess I ll have to wait for the pages and pages of posts calling out trump then. So far the only person to do it really is boogie and he immediately gets attacked for doing so. After pages and pages criticizing Biden and going on and on about merit and DEI for last for years. Not you specifically.
We did it last time, if you don't remember that's not our fault.
We've been through this. Either you can't read, you refuse to read, or you conveniently forget what you read. We criticized Trump during his last administration.
There's no way you can possibly show this much cognitive dissonance. This site was not (other than QO) GO TRUMP! HE IS OUR PERFECT LEADER! During his last administration. No way one could have been here, reading this site during that time, and believe it was.
posted by jmogWe did it last time, if you don't remember that's not our fault.
We've been through this. Either you can't read, you refuse to read, or you conveniently forget what you read. We criticized Trump during his last administration.
There's no way you can possibly show this much cognitive dissonance. This site was not (other than QO) GO TRUMP! HE IS OUR PERFECT LEADER! During his last administration. No way one could have been here, reading this site during that time, and believe it was.
im literally talking about right now with the current cabinet postings. And again you dont read. I said nothing about people saying great things about trump. I said it was pages and pages bashing the dems for something and SILENCE when GOP does it, or for example instead of just saying yea thats a shitty pick, you for example will dig up someone Obama appointed to give us a what about burger.
posted by geeblock
I guess I ll have to wait for the pages and pages of posts calling out trump then. So far the only person to do it really is boogie and he immediately gets attacked for doing so. After pages and pages criticizing Biden and going on and on about merit and DEI for last for years. Not you specifically.
Verifiably false, really, outright lying. You don't even have to do much searching, all you have to do is read a few pages back in this thread to find people criticizing Trump. Also, we have told you to go look through other threads to find what you say doesn't exist. But you won't do it because then you won't be able to act stupid/ignorant.
I have stood up for you a few times in this forum - and gotten bitched at for doing it - but when you outright lie, I will call you out on it.
On the other hand, you believe paying taxes is voluntary, so people shouldn't expect much more than this from you.
posted by CenterBHSFanVerifiably false, really, outright lying. You don't even have to do much searching, all you have to do is read a few pages back in this thread to find people criticizing Trump. Also, we have told you to go look through other threads to find what you say doesn't exist. But you won't do it because then you won't be able to act stupid/ignorant.
I have stood up for you a few times in this forum - and gotten bitched at for doing it - but when you outright lie, I will call you out on it.
On the other hand, you believe paying taxes is voluntary, so people shouldn't expect much more than this from you.
I can tell you have never worked in a cash business or in the service industry where you get paid in cash
posted by geeblockI can tell you have never worked in a cash business or in the service industry where you get paid in cash
How do you think that you know this. Please explain in detail lol
posted by CenterBHSFanHow do you think that you know this. Please explain in detail lol
If you think people in those situations pay the appropriate amount of taxes I would suggest you have not
posted by geeblockIf you think people in those situations pay the appropriate amount of taxes I would suggest you have not
Oh, so it's just your opinion, based on nothing.
Ok.
posted by geeblockIf you think people in those situations pay the appropriate amount of taxes I would suggest you have not
Choosing to commit tax fraud doesn't make taxes voluntary. A teacher should be able to understand this, especially after it's been explained multiple times.
Donating $3 to the federal election commission is voluntary. Paying the taxes is not.
posted by gutChoosing to commit tax fraud doesn't make taxes voluntary. A teacher should be able to understand this, especially after it's been explained multiple times.
Donating $3 to the federal election commission is voluntary. Paying the taxes is not.
Thanks for the tax lesson, for the record the voluntary part of the discussion was the fact that businesses could choose to sign up for the new plan or continue with the old way. Thus to sign up for the new plan was “voluntary “