SQ_Crazies wrote:
2kool4skool wrote:
SQ_Crazies wrote:
You're right, a documentary that was released in like 5 cities is totally on par for a comparison with a worldwide release on a movie that cost 100 times more to make. Pretty fair to compare attendance figures there...
Woah, calm down chief. I understand you're passionate about Avatar because it didn't have many black people in it, but no need to make a bunch of irrational arguments because of it.
Well you just took yoursaelf out of this adult discussion.
Nah, you did that a long time ago with your infamous PM meltdown.
Regardless, I'll try and treat you as an adult capable of rational discussion here.
The highest grossing movie of each year is exactly that; the highest grossing movie. It doesn't mean that it was the best, or even that the most people liked it. A very small % of Avatar's gross was from repeat viewers. People bought tickets because of the trailer, advertising campaign, and knowing exactly what they were going to get; a comfortable, don't make me think too much, plot with fantastic special affects.
If you want to argue Avatar was the best film this year, go right ahead, it's certainly revolutionary and entertaining. But don't use stupid arguments like "well it sold the most tickets, must be better." If anything, history has shown us the highest grossing films each year don't really stand up over time, and generally the under the radar ones are seen as the best years down the road.
Basically, just use some actual critical thought to support your argument.