Keebler wrote:

Belly35 wrote:

assumption wrote: Started 2 threads in the politics section. Neither was accepted. Who can explain this. Did not call anyone out or use improper language. It concerned political adds. Really kinda ticks me off if the reason the threads were banned was because of my beliefs. If in fact that is the reason................shame on the FREE huddle!

Check your grammar...

Pot meet kettle.

assumption wrote: Keebler and Go Chiefs; or is it frick and frack. I'm well satisfied with the explanation I received from more civil posters. Won't bother your feeble minds again.

assumption wrote: ... Won't bother your feeble minds again.

GoChiefs wrote: LMAO..I see assumption started a thread about us on the other place!

"How many have checked out the free huddle. Hard to beleive thats going to last long. Shoud call it the FREE PORN huddle. Lots of very filthy posts. Even garbage user-names. I asked a legitimate question and got bombarded with all forms of insults. Some from moderators."

GoChiefs wrote: LMAO..I see assumption started a thread about us on the other place!

"How many have checked out the free huddle. Hard to beleive thats going to last long. Shoud call it the FREE PORN huddle. Lots of very filthy posts. Even garbage user-names. I asked a legitimate question and got bombarded with all forms of insults. Some from moderators."

Heretic wrote:

GoChiefs wrote: LMAO..I see assumption started a thread about us on the other place!

"How many have checked out the free huddle. Hard to beleive thats going to last long. Shoud call it the FREE PORN huddle. Lots of very filthy posts. Even garbage user-names. I asked a legitimate question and got bombarded with all forms of insults. Some from moderators."

Man, poor chap has to really feel ostracized if he posted that there, considering the long-standing JJ policy of "YOU BETTER NEVER MENTION ANY SIMILAR BOARD ON THIS SITE YOU STUPID PEASANTS!!!!!" (unwritten rule 431.2b)

Hopefully for his sake, that post was only deleted and he wasn't banned into eternity for daring to mention this site. Although it might be for the best if he was. If he went into that sort of overreacting hysteria over the responses he got on this thread, he probably isn't emotionally suited for message boards.

assumption wrote: Your concern for my emotional status , while appreciated
isn't necessary. The thread had not been deleted as of yesterday. As far as "overreacting" it is possible the replys were in the category as well.

Fab1b wrote: Dude are you that sensative you can't take a ribbing on a message board?

Heretic wrote:

Man, poor chap has to really feel ostracized if he posted that there, considering the long-standing JJ policy of "YOU BETTER NEVER MENTION ANY SIMILAR BOARD ON THIS SITE YOU STUPID PEASANTS!!!!!" (unwritten rule 431.2b)

Hopefully for his sake, that post was only deleted and he wasn't banned into eternity for daring to mention this site. Although it might be for the best if he was. If he went into that sort of overreacting hysteria over the responses he got on this thread, he probably isn't emotionally suited for message boards.

Heretic wrote: ^^
[size=xx-large]You would be correct[/size]. Or at least today is. Some days are quite entertaining and busy. This just doesn't happen to be one of them, to which I say BOOOO-URNS.