thread not accepted

Home Archive Serious Business thread not accepted
GoChiefs's avatar

GoChiefs

Resident Maniac

16,754 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:01 PM
Shit..is this another mod gang rape?
Feb 24, 2010 4:01pm
jordo212000's avatar

jordo212000

Senior Member

10,664 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:01 PM
GoChiefs wrote:
jordo212000 wrote: I follow politics a little but I can't ever imagine myself or anybody else getting THAT butthurt over what some random, anonymous poster says on a message board.
Really? Did you ever read the politics forums over on the other place???
Sometimes. I just take everything as a grain of salt. Who cares if you have some crazy Republican whining about Obama or some Democrat making fun of the Tea Party guys. I respect your decision to do the politics forum like that, and it really doesn't change my life one way or another. I just found it a little odd.
Feb 24, 2010 4:01pm
Q

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

7,117 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:01 PM
LJ wrote: I can't believe Wes didn't know you are supposed to grab the other guy's thumb when doing the elephant walk, not actually grab his dong....
He thought it was your thumb. :)
Feb 24, 2010 4:01pm
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:01 PM
GoChiefs wrote: Shit..is this another mod gang rape?
Well, it is Wednesday...or as we call it on the mod forum, Weinerday.
Feb 24, 2010 4:01pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:03 PM
jordo212000 wrote:
GoChiefs wrote:
jordo212000 wrote: I follow politics a little but I can't ever imagine myself or anybody else getting THAT butthurt over what some random, anonymous poster says on a message board.
Really? Did you ever read the politics forums over on the other place???
Sometimes. I just take everything as a grain of salt. Who cares if you have some crazy Republican whining about Obama or some Democrat making fun of the Tea Party guys. I respect your decision to do the politics forum like that, and it really doesn't change my life one way or another. I just found it a little odd.
It's actually to keep real conversation going on and not just a bitchfest and/or having 1 poster make 10 annoying threads in 1 day.
Feb 24, 2010 4:03pm
GoChiefs's avatar

GoChiefs

Resident Maniac

16,754 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:04 PM
jordo212000 wrote: Who cares if you have some crazy Republican whining about Obama or some Democrat making fun of the Tea Party guys. I respect your decision to do the politics forum like that, and it really doesn't change my life one way or another.
I agree..but unfortunately..not everyone can see it that way.
Feb 24, 2010 4:04pm
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:13 PM
assumption wrote: Started 2 threads in the politics section. Neither was accepted. Who can explain this. Did not call anyone out or use improper language. It concerned political adds. Really kinda ticks me off if the reason the threads were banned was because of my beliefs. If in fact that is the reason................shame on the FREE huddle!
Check your grammar...
Feb 24, 2010 4:13pm
A

assumption

Senior Member

147 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:22 PM
Man all I asked for was a simple explanation. LOL Sorry if I upset a mod or two. Did start some interesting dialog tho.
Feb 24, 2010 4:22pm
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:22 PM
wes_mantooth wrote: God this place sucks.

Eff FreeHuddle.
No, eff ewe!
Feb 24, 2010 4:22pm
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:25 PM
I started a thread the other day about Ron Paul winning a straw poll (re: 2012 nomination) at some typically Republican conference and it was never posted. I didn't feel the need to raise hell over it since it is a fucking internet message board, though I am curious why it didn't make the cut.
Feb 24, 2010 4:25pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:27 PM
Cleveland Buck wrote: I started a thread the other day about Ron Paul winning a straw poll (re: 2012 nomination) at some typically Republican conference and it was never posted. I didn't feel the need to raise hell over it since it is a fucking internet message board, though I am curious why it didn't make the cut.
Shit... monday night? I approved that on my phone, must not have worked.
Feb 24, 2010 4:27pm
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:27 PM
assumption wrote: Man all I asked for was a simple explanation. LOL Sorry if I upset a mod or two. Did start some interesting dialog tho.
I really doubt that you piss off any mods with this...but we mods love to pounce on these threads and act like jackasses......well, at least I do.

I would say other things, but justincredible recently put in more rules than Nazi Germany had.
Feb 24, 2010 4:27pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:29 PM
assumption wrote: Man all I asked for was a simple explanation. LOL Sorry if I upset a mod or two. Did start some interesting dialog tho.
This is serious business. Serious business does not get simple explanations ;)
Feb 24, 2010 4:29pm
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:30 PM
LJ wrote:
Cleveland Buck wrote: I started a thread the other day about Ron Paul winning a straw poll (re: 2012 nomination) at some typically Republican conference and it was never posted. I didn't feel the need to raise hell over it since it is a fucking internet message board, though I am curious why it didn't make the cut.
Shit... monday night? I approved that on my phone, must not have worked.
Something like that. I'll try it again then.
Feb 24, 2010 4:30pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:31 PM
Cleveland Buck wrote:
LJ wrote:
Cleveland Buck wrote: I started a thread the other day about Ron Paul winning a straw poll (re: 2012 nomination) at some typically Republican conference and it was never posted. I didn't feel the need to raise hell over it since it is a fucking internet message board, though I am curious why it didn't make the cut.
Shit... monday night? I approved that on my phone, must not have worked.
Something like that. I'll try it again then.
I went in and found it and approved it. I'll bump it.
Feb 24, 2010 4:31pm
N

Nate

Formerly Known As Keebler

3,949 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:33 PM
Belly35 wrote:
assumption wrote: Started 2 threads in the politics section. Neither was accepted. Who can explain this. Did not call anyone out or use improper language. It concerned political adds. Really kinda ticks me off if the reason the threads were banned was because of my beliefs. If in fact that is the reason................shame on the FREE huddle!
Check your grammar...
Pot meet kettle.
Feb 24, 2010 4:33pm
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:38 PM
Thanks boss. I mean, fuck you nazi mods.
Feb 24, 2010 4:38pm
A

assumption

Senior Member

147 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:39 PM
LJ wrote:
jordo212000 wrote:
GoChiefs wrote:
jordo212000 wrote: I follow politics a little but I can't ever imagine myself or anybody else getting THAT butthurt over what some random, anonymous poster says on a message board.
Really? Did you ever read the politics forums over on the other place???
Sometimes. I just take everything as a grain of salt. Who cares if you have some crazy Republican whining about Obama or some Democrat making fun of the Tea Party guys. I respect your decision to do the politics forum like that, and it really doesn't change my life one way or another. I just found it a little odd.
It's actually to keep real conversation going on and not just a bitchfest and/or having 1 poster make 10 annoying threads in 1 day.
All this because of a misunderstandng on my part. Moderators do a thankless job. However I can't beleive some of the garbage that is allowed on this forum. No chance of reading any more "annoying" threads from this poster. Maybe all huddles have run their course.
Feb 24, 2010 4:39pm
GoChiefs's avatar

GoChiefs

Resident Maniac

16,754 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:57 PM
assumption wrote: Who can explain this.
So you ask for an explanation..and then when given an explanation..you're not satisfied?
Feb 24, 2010 4:57pm
N

Nate

Formerly Known As Keebler

3,949 posts
Feb 24, 2010 4:59 PM
GoChiefs wrote:
assumption wrote: Who can explain this.
So you ask for an explanation..and then when given an explanation..you're not satisfied?
I think you are making an assumption.
Feb 24, 2010 4:59pm
FatHobbit's avatar

FatHobbit

Senior Member

8,651 posts
Feb 24, 2010 5:23 PM
Keebler wrote: I think you are making an assumption.
You know what happens when you make an assumption...
Feb 24, 2010 5:23pm
Fab1b's avatar

Fab1b

The Bald A-Hole!!

12,949 posts
Feb 24, 2010 5:26 PM
assumption wrote: Birds and the bees, who can explain this.

Ask your parents
Feb 24, 2010 5:26pm
2quik4u's avatar

2quik4u

Senior Member

4,388 posts
Feb 24, 2010 7:04 PM
this is why I rarely post threads on political forum, I dont need people to approve my shit before it is posted.
Feb 24, 2010 7:04pm
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Feb 24, 2010 7:08 PM
Keebler wrote:
Belly35 wrote:
assumption wrote: Started 2 threads in the politics section. Neither was accepted. Who can explain this. Did not call anyone out or use improper language. It concerned political adds. Really kinda ticks me off if the reason the threads were banned was because of my beliefs. If in fact that is the reason................shame on the FREE huddle!
Check your grammar...
Pot meet kettle.
LOL
Feb 24, 2010 7:08pm
C

cbus4life

Ignorant

2,849 posts
Feb 24, 2010 7:21 PM
We still love you, Belly.
Feb 24, 2010 7:21pm