Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Oct 12, 2017 11:12am
The exec order is out of obama's playbook.
obviously obama planned all along for the eventual and complete takeover by a marxist central government.
obviously obama planned all along for the eventual and complete takeover by a marxist central government.
R
rocketalum
Posts: 268
Oct 12, 2017 11:13am
I think he means using executive orders to bypass congress...and effectively the constitution. Which I thought constitutional minded conservatives hated? Wasn't that a big driving factor of the tea party? Wasn't Obama a dictator? Why is this ok? Where's the outrage?Spock;1877087 wrote:?????? What are you talking about? Obama didnt want anything to do with open and free markets.
For the record my opinion is Obama executive orders bad. Trump E.O's bad. So because congress is ineffective or doesn't give the Pres what he wants we can just circumvent them? Not ok...right???
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Oct 12, 2017 12:01pm
No, I am amused by the irony.
Obviously the few idiots in the senate who have tanked the major policy initiatives this year are the problem. So, we either wait another cycle or two until they are shown the door, or we do what is allowed by law to alleviate the suffering of The (300 million) People who have been economically raped by obamaKare.
Obviously the few idiots in the senate who have tanked the major policy initiatives this year are the problem. So, we either wait another cycle or two until they are shown the door, or we do what is allowed by law to alleviate the suffering of The (300 million) People who have been economically raped by obamaKare.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5c5b/f5c5bfcdad4e55eba7203dbf19485276cfd5a84a" alt="CenterBHSFan's avatar"
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Oct 12, 2017 3:30pm
The problem with that theory is this: if the lefty politicians are still playing the identity politics card (and I've seen no easing up on this other than Nancy Pelosi not jiving with antifa) you can almost guarantee that those righty politicians that you are referring to will not be voted out.QuakerOats;1877107 wrote:Obviously the few idiots in the senate who have tanked the major policy initiatives this year are the problem. So, we either wait another cycle or two until they are shown the door, or we do what is allowed by law to alleviate the suffering of The (300 million) People who have been economically raped by obamaKare.
So then what?
R
rocketalum
Posts: 268
Oct 12, 2017 4:01pm
So go around congress and continue down the path of granting an inordinate amount of power to the Executive...just like the founders intended! A real win for the constitution! You may like the reason it's being done but that doesn't make doing it ok. This isn't an anti-Trump thing he's just the latest in a long line down this path. What I find odd is the average Trump is super "pro-constitution" whatever that means but this is very anti-constitution. I just wish we could all admit we want our team to win, we're a bunch of political homers and the rule breaking we cry about when our team is losing is fine when they're winning. All the grand standing and hypocrisy is exhausting.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Oct 12, 2017 4:18pm
I'm a pretty big believer that 60 votes in the Senate would GENERALLY ensure more than a simple majority and bipartisan support....it is [was] our only line of defense against endless strings of bad legislation.rocketalum;1877163 wrote:So go around congress and continue down the path of granting an inordinate amount of power to the Executive...
A "do nothing" Congress is generally more effective [i.e. less damaging] than a Congress ramming partisan legislation thru.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Oct 12, 2017 4:43pm
Amen
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Oct 12, 2017 8:43pm
I agree. Although I don't remember reading these thoughts from you during the Obama regime.rocketalum;1877163 wrote:So go around congress and continue down the path of granting an inordinate amount of power to the Executive...just like the founders intended! A real win for the constitution! You may like the reason it's being done but that doesn't make doing it ok. This isn't an anti-Trump thing he's just the latest in a long line down this path. What I find odd is the average Trump is super "pro-constitution" whatever that means but this is very anti-constitution. I just wish we could all admit we want our team to win, we're a bunch of political homers and the rule breaking we cry about when our team is losing is fine when they're winning. All the grand standing and hypocrisy is exhausting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe3d5/fe3d5e1c1793efdfc25f8d449187c8727d3d59de" alt="fish82's avatar"
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Oct 13, 2017 9:24am
Well, for better or worse...Trump now owns healthcare. No doubt the democrat party is breathing a sign of relief.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Oct 13, 2017 10:10am
"NAM Vice President of Infrastructure, Innovation and Human Resources Policy Robyn Boerstling writes that on Thursday “
resident Trump signed an Executive Order (EO) which expands Association Health Plans (AHPs) and possibly creates a pathway for the sale of health insurance across state lines through the AHPs.” Boerstling states that “for over a decade, the NAM has supported efforts to increase small businesses’ health insurance options through AHPs,” and “NAM has urged elected officials to usher in this important reform.” She adds that “manufacturers are in a dynamic health care environment that continues to evolve, yet costs continue to rise for many,” and “ongoing health care cost increases stand in the way of increasing wages, hiring new employees, purchasing new equipment and making other needed investments that keep manufacturing production competitive.” Boerstling concludes that “today’s EO is a positive step,” and is “a new tool as our members continue to seek more affordable health care options.”
Definitely a positive step. At least one elected official is not afraid to do his job.
Definitely a positive step. At least one elected official is not afraid to do his job.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6630/e6630386b43ffe76302b65588823f9c269cae62f" alt="Spock's avatar"
Spock
Posts: 2,853
Oct 13, 2017 11:06am
not even close.fish82;1877209 wrote:Well, for better or worse...Trump now owns healthcare. No doubt the democrat party is breathing a sign of relief.
P
ppaw1999
Posts: 344
Oct 13, 2017 11:10am
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/trump-administration-end-obamacare-subsidies-known-cost-sharing-034004960--abc-news-topstories.htmlSpock;1877223 wrote:not even close.
He might now. Right or wrong, he is definitely shaking things up.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Oct 13, 2017 1:31pm
When the options are watching obamaKare destroy The People economically along with the greatest health care delivery system the world has ever known, or doing something else, it is pretty clear that 'shaking things up' is the start of going in a much better direction.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Oct 13, 2017 1:36pm
Once again, the INSURERS themselves are not responsible for the cost of healthcare in the US. Typical bill of bullshit sold to you by the Democrats, so they could claim to fix (ahem...cough cough) something that wasn't a problem
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Oct 13, 2017 1:46pm
completely agreeSpock;1877223 wrote:not even close.
P
ppaw1999
Posts: 344
Oct 13, 2017 1:55pm
Here in Ohio the Republican representatives are considering doing away with Medicaid. President Trump is doing away with the subsidies that aided the poor for Obamacare. What happens now will have to be owned by the Right. I agree Obamacare is a disaster. I'm just not sure that what President Trump is doing won't make matters worst.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Oct 13, 2017 2:23pm
This really is kind of a contradiction. The problem is Obamacare accomplished very little, aside from hand out premiums to millions of poor people - but they still couldn't afford the copays and deductibles to actually use that insurance.ppaw1999;1877258 wrote: I agree Obamacare is a disaster. I'm just not sure that what President Trump is doing won't make matters worst.
So I'm not sure how Trump can actually make things worse. There is absolutely nothing to prevent YOUR state from addressing healthcare in whatever way it thinks best for its people. THAT is an issue to take up with your state govt, not the feds.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Oct 13, 2017 2:33pm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f9b8/4f9b8bc18faa8758c6dffc00f6edbf73435b55a9" alt="FatHobbit's avatar"
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Oct 14, 2017 1:13am
Ding, ding, ding we have a winner!gut;1877251 wrote:Once again, the INSURERS themselves are not responsible for the cost of healthcare in the US. Typical bill of bullshit sold to you by the Democrats, so they could claim to fix (ahem...cough cough) something that wasn't a problem
P
ppaw1999
Posts: 344
Oct 15, 2017 7:06pm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f622/8f6225fde8c0c7b4a11200f99f6f2975950d6c99" alt="salto's avatar"
salto
Posts: 2,611
Oct 15, 2017 7:20pm
After insurance rates rise significantly for many drumpf supporters, how will they continue to blame Obama?Spock;1877223 wrote:not even close.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f622/8f6225fde8c0c7b4a11200f99f6f2975950d6c99" alt="salto's avatar"
salto
Posts: 2,611
Oct 15, 2017 7:22pm
After insurance rates rise significantly for many drumpf supporters, how will they continue to blame Obama?Spock;1877223 wrote:not even close.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Oct 15, 2017 8:30pm
Perhaps for not having to pay taxes for insurance they can't afford to use?salto;1877489 wrote:After insurance rates rise significantly for many drumpf supporters, how will they continue to blame Obama?
P
ppaw1999
Posts: 344
Oct 15, 2017 9:00pm
Two different demographics. According to the article a large number of people depend on the subsidies.gut;1877501 wrote:Perhaps for not having to pay taxes for insurance they can't afford to use?
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Oct 15, 2017 9:10pm
To HAVE insurance, sure. To actually be able to afford to use it is a different story.ppaw1999;1877503 wrote:Two different demographics. According to the article a large number of people depend on the subsidies.
Please, let's stop pretending like giving someone a handout is in any way a feather in the cap of Obamacare.