D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 22, 2010 11:23am
Basically how I see it playing out.Big Red Monster wrote: Trade the pick if Kansas City takes Berry.
Trade out of the Top 10 and select Thomas. Pick up a pick or two.
M
miller45452003
Posts: 673
Apr 22, 2010 11:35am
^^^I am with you 110%...can never have to many picks.devil1197 wrote:Basically how I see it playing out.Big Red Monster wrote: Trade the pick if Kansas City takes Berry.
Trade out of the Top 10 and select Thomas. Pick up a pick or two.
P
pkebker
Posts: 760
Apr 22, 2010 11:45am
It pains me to read that...
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Apr 22, 2010 12:05pm
How would you feel about drafting Jimmy Clausen?
At #38? Recent mock over on the OBR has us with Berry at #7 & Clausen at #38. There's been a lot of talk recently of Clausen making an Aaron Rodgers/Brady Quinn type free fall. Smell Kiper has him going to the Vikes at 30.
At #38? Recent mock over on the OBR has us with Berry at #7 & Clausen at #38. There's been a lot of talk recently of Clausen making an Aaron Rodgers/Brady Quinn type free fall. Smell Kiper has him going to the Vikes at 30.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 22, 2010 12:08pm
If Clausen falls that far, I'd take him over McCoy.
But he isn't worth it to me for our 1st rounder.
But he isn't worth it to me for our 1st rounder.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Apr 22, 2010 12:10pm
Agreed. The pill wouldn't be as bitter to swallow at 38 then at #7. The funny thing is, I'm hearing that Tebow AND McCoy could leapfrog him.devil1197 wrote: If Clausen falls that far, I'd take him over McCoy.
But he isn't worth it to me for our 1st rounder.
BCBulldog
Posts: 824
Apr 22, 2010 12:10pm
I still don't like him, but QB is a need and he would likely be the best player on the board if he is there at #38, so I could live with it.
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Apr 22, 2010 12:25pm
Much easier said than done.Big Red Monster wrote: Trade the pick if Kansas City takes Berry.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 22, 2010 12:27pm
Not really imo.Writerbuckeye wrote:Much easier said than done.Big Red Monster wrote: Trade the pick if Kansas City takes Berry.
Cleveland was able to trade down multiple times in last years draft.
There will always be mid level teams that try to get into the Top 10 in order to get their specific player.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Apr 22, 2010 12:30pm
Last year was the perfect storm for other teams to trade up because Mangini grabbed his ankles and had an "insert here" sign with an arrow pointing down taped to his lower back.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 22, 2010 12:32pm
Haha, true.BR1986FB wrote: Last year was the perfect storm for other teams to trade up because Mangini grabbed his ankles and had an "insert here" sign with an arrow pointing down taped to his lower back.
But Cleveland, if they want to, will find a suitable trade partner.
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Apr 22, 2010 12:34pm
Clausen is the most pro ready QB in this year's draft. I read it in ND's press release about hm.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Apr 22, 2010 5:48pm
I'm gonna snap if they take Derrick Morgan. I've been hearing his name ALL afternoon for the #7 pick. Either him or Dan Williams. Didn't they learn their lesson from the failed Wimbley experiment?
B
buckeyes_woowee
Posts: 512
Apr 22, 2010 6:00pm
I would rather have Brandon Graham then Morgan
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Apr 22, 2010 6:05pm
The names being dropped for/by Cleveland are all over the place.BR1986FB wrote: I'm gonna snap if they take Derrick Morgan. I've been hearing his name ALL afternoon for the #7 pick. Either him or Dan Williams. Didn't they learn their lesson from the failed Wimbley experiment?
I'm not buying into ANY of it.
I think it's all a smokescreen.
Which generally means I don't have a clue what the Browns are going to do at this point.
KR1245
Posts: 4,317
Apr 22, 2010 6:27pm
How far back do you think the Browns be will be able to drop and still grab Thomas? It seems like his name is gaining some momentum and there are quite a few teams interested.
hangonsloopy
Posts: 1,291
Apr 22, 2010 6:42pm
I think if Berry is gone they should just take Thomas at 7. He is getting alot of attention and it's not really a huge reach.
O
OhioStatePride2003
Posts: 686
Apr 22, 2010 7:29pm
Just said on ESPN that Cleveland has been on the phone with St. Louis about the #1 pick. The original offer was for most of our picks this year, and a few next year. I hate it.
S
spartan
Posts: 178
Apr 22, 2010 7:32pm
if that happen i would say fire mikeOhioStatePride2003 wrote: Just said on ESPN that Cleveland has been on the phone with St. Louis about the #1 pick. The original offer was for most of our picks this year, and a few next year. I hate it.
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Apr 22, 2010 7:32pm
If the Browns give away their whole draft for Bradford I will never again in my life spend a penny on the Browns or any Browns merchandise. If they move up and take Suh I won't be as upset, though I still wouldn't like losing all of those picks.
fiction
Posts: 347
Apr 22, 2010 7:44pm
damn those 4 meaningless wins.Cleveland Buck wrote: If the Browns give away their whole draft for Bradford I will never again in my life spend a penny on the Browns or any Browns merchandise. If they move up and take Suh I won't be as upset, though I still wouldn't like losing all of those picks.
O
OhioStatePride2003
Posts: 686
Apr 22, 2010 7:56pm
They might want to stay where they are. I am reading over on the live ESPN chat, that Dallas is in talks with the Dolphins about moving up. Now this could be for one of two reasons in my opinion, Jerry Jones is just trying to prove that he and Parcells are on good terms, or the more likely scenario - Dallas wants Earl Thomas.KR1245 wrote: How far back do you think the Browns be will be able to drop and still grab Thomas? It seems like his name is gaining some momentum and there are quite a few teams interested.
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Apr 22, 2010 8:07pm
Trade down!!! Trade with Jacksonville.
B
buckeyes_woowee
Posts: 512
Apr 22, 2010 8:10pm
I say take Okung if Seattle passes
B
buckeyes_woowee
Posts: 512
Apr 22, 2010 8:15pm
Well forget that idea