Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Mar 18, 2010 11:22am
That's why I listed S first and CB second.pkebker wrote:Yes, but there is a priority for what positions we need, which is what buckeye is trying to say. Safety and CB must be addressed or teams will continue to light us up.Sonofanump wrote:Looks like they need everything but a LT, C and a guy to return kicks...Writerbuckeye wrote: Cleveland's two biggest needs are safety and CB.
Those are immediate needs.
They also need to draft a QB for the future, along with a LB or two to develop, and some OL for the future.
The remaining biggest need is a No. 1 WR
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Mar 18, 2010 11:26am
Scott would be a good 4th round option imo.
Haden improved his stock and I expect Cleveland to take him at #7 if Berry is not available.
Haden improved his stock and I expect Cleveland to take him at #7 if Berry is not available.
F
Fabio
Posts: 547
Mar 18, 2010 11:38am
Yup. Ever since Les Miles has taken over, LSU's RB philosophy has been to recruit those big bruiser backs who are tough and get you those vital yards on 2nd/3rd and short. You won't see a lot of blazers in the back field but they'll run over you.Speedofsand wrote:I like Scott. His worst game was vs. Florida. I met his parents before that game and they were great to chat with. I'd say he is a typical RB, strong, dependable, nothing spectacular but very capable of getting yards.BR1986FB wrote: http://cle.scout.com/2/954907.html
E
Eric Taylor
Posts: 602
Mar 18, 2010 12:58pm
Sounds like Seattle is willing to deal Hasselbeck after the trade for Whitehurst.
It's a shame Cleveland signed JD instead of waiting a little bit.
It's a shame Cleveland signed JD instead of waiting a little bit.
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Mar 18, 2010 2:04pm
I have a feeling when the Holmgren honeymoon is over in 8 months, you Brown fans will be calling for his head. All of these offseason moves and I've yet to see an improvement.
Keep em coming Walrus?
Keep em coming Walrus?
gibby08
Posts: 1,581
Mar 18, 2010 2:14pm
BR1986FB wrote: Sims was the best of a not so good Seattle O-Line last year.
As far as Tebow goes, I'm with WB and would prefer McCoy.
Then you would be a dumbass
B
big_hits24
Posts: 175
Mar 18, 2010 2:15pm
So who are the Steelers going to take since Big Ben won't be around because of his problems of taking advantage of college girls?
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 18, 2010 2:34pm
And why is that, Captain Dumbfuck?gibby08 wrote:BR1986FB wrote: Sims was the best of a not so good Seattle O-Line last year.
As far as Tebow goes, I'm with WB and would prefer McCoy.
Then you would be a dumbass
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 18, 2010 2:35pm
According to ESPN Insider's lead in, it looks like Holmgren may be having Mangini keep the seat warm for Carolina's John Fox.
gibby08
Posts: 1,581
Mar 18, 2010 2:35pm
You honestly think Colt McCoy is going to be better than Tim Tebow in the NFL??
If you believe that...you don't know as much as you think
If you believe that...you don't know as much as you think
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 18, 2010 2:39pm
I think he'll be better in a WCO. Hell, the jury is still out on whether an OPTION QB in Tebow can even consistently take a snap from under center.
And you can believe all of this smoke & mirrors about Holmgren, Mangini, etc meeting with him at his Pro Day but I'd be VERY surprised if they took Tebow.
And you can believe all of this smoke & mirrors about Holmgren, Mangini, etc meeting with him at his Pro Day but I'd be VERY surprised if they took Tebow.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Mar 18, 2010 2:44pm
Your website failed..your life fails..you fail..your QB valuing fails too!gibby08 wrote: You honestly think Colt McCoy is going to be better than Tim Tebow in the NFL??
If you believe that...you don't know as much as you think
D
Dozer
Posts: 25
Mar 18, 2010 2:53pm
Interesting to see that seattle gave up a decent amount for a 3rd string qb in whitehurst i wonder if the hawks were at all interested in Quinn before he was dealt to the Broncos
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Mar 18, 2010 3:00pm
Given your history of abject failure in EVERY aspect of these forums, I feel pretty confident that going contrary to anything you say is probably the right call.gibby08 wrote: You honestly think Colt McCoy is going to be better than Tim Tebow in the NFL??
If you believe that...you don't know as much as you think
gibby08
Posts: 1,581
Mar 18, 2010 3:09pm
I'd be willing to bet everything I have that Tim Tebow has a much better career than Colt McCoy
How many 6 foot tall QB's are having success in the NFL?? One,and Colt McCoy is as good as the SB MVP
How many 6 foot tall QB's are having success in the NFL?? One,and Colt McCoy is as good as the SB MVP
gibby08
Posts: 1,581
Mar 18, 2010 3:10pm
BR1986FB wrote: I think he'll be better in a WCO. Hell, the jury is still out on whether an OPTION QB in Tebow can even consistently take a snap from under center.
And you can believe all of this smoke & mirrors about Holmgren, Mangini, etc meeting with him at his Pro Day but I'd be VERY surprised if they took Tebow.
Oops....
Sorry..I forgot not to question the Ohio Chatter Browns guru.
Yea right
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Mar 18, 2010 3:19pm
Just because you'd deep throat Tebow on general principle isn't reason enough not to question his mechanics and his ability to be smarter than a box-o-rocks when it comes to reading defenses.
gibby08
Posts: 1,581
Mar 18, 2010 3:21pm
Have you been listening to any of the reports coming out of his Pro day and private workouts??
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Mar 18, 2010 3:23pm
The one that mentioned the clouds parting or the one where he's playing catch with a kid in a wheel chair?
gibby08
Posts: 1,581
Mar 18, 2010 3:24pm
Your attempt at humor makes you look ignorant
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Mar 18, 2010 3:24pm
Or chopping penises?
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 18, 2010 3:25pm
Uggh, asshole....if I were the ONLY one saying this I might tend to agree with you. Not that anyone is saying McCoy is going to be the second coming but it seems like there's a WHOLE lot more negativity to bringing in Tebow.gibby08 wrote:BR1986FB wrote: I think he'll be better in a WCO. Hell, the jury is still out on whether an OPTION QB in Tebow can even consistently take a snap from under center.
And you can believe all of this smoke & mirrors about Holmgren, Mangini, etc meeting with him at his Pro Day but I'd be VERY surprised if they took Tebow.
Oops....
Sorry..I forgot not to question the Ohio Chatter Browns guru.
Yea right
It's got nothing to do with questioning me. I've been wrong before and I'm sure I'll be wrong again. Just think McCoy is better suited to the shorter, more ACCURATE passing game of a WCO.
I don't know WHO you are but from the comments made about you by a few in a short span I can tell you're a dumbfuck who doesn't know shit.
gibby08
Posts: 1,581
Mar 18, 2010 3:27pm
^^^
And you know anything?? Do you work in the Cleveland Browns front office?? Are you privy to their draft information??
And you know anything?? Do you work in the Cleveland Browns front office?? Are you privy to their draft information??
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Mar 18, 2010 3:28pm
A couple months have improved his mechanics slightly, not enough to boost his draft status. His wonderlic still sucks ass, basically, you want to look at him hitting a couple deep balls against no defense and elevate him to Joe Montana status. Ain't gonna happen chief.
gibby08
Posts: 1,581
Mar 18, 2010 3:29pm
The wonderlic doesn't mean shit. Brett Farve got a 22 and Dan Marino got a 16. Seems to me they turned out just fine