I do not think ANYONE (other than someone trolling) is saying that Pete the player was not a 1st ballot HoFer. The only 2 "knocks" on Pete (other than trolling) have been responses to him being the "best hitter of all time" which is extremely false, and whether he should be allowed in due to the gambling.Laley23;1630256 wrote:lol, thanks. I was way to lazy.
So, 697 more hits and .010 more points on BA then what is a gold standard for automatic inclusion...and this is before he started declining when the numbers started to slip/"get inflated to due playing so long" in his later years. So....explain to me how anyone makes the argument that isnt a 1st ballot HoFer???
And to DA's response to separating Pete the player from Pete the manager. You can't do that, they are the same exact person.