ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Oct 19, 2014 3:36pm
Lol. Wowts1227;1664770 wrote:AP Poll
1. Mississippi State (43)
2. Florida State (14)
3. Ole Miss (3)
4. Alabama
5. Auburn
6. Oregon
7. Notre Dame
8. Michigan State
9. Georgia
10. TCU
13. Ohio State
23. Marshall
http://collegefootball.ap.org/poll
S
Sonofanump
Oct 19, 2014 3:47pm
Well no. Screens are legal when a ball is caught behind the neutral zone as pass interference rules only applies to a ball that cross that plane untouched.Classyposter58;1664715 wrote:That's why screens are used, you can kinda get away with it because it happens so quick it's really bang bang. This was not
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Oct 19, 2014 7:18pm
Lord, full retard has been achieved when "making a point" constitutes stating the obvious. Especially considering that, as said above, Ohio is using their back-up quarterback, too, so your "we had to use a back-up" excuse has no merit.Pick6;1664751 wrote:congrats on being the better team yesterday.Keep in mind Akron is a program 1.5 seasons removed from 3 straight 1-11 seasons. Keep in mind that OU beat Akron by 37 points at Akron last season with our starting QB. Enjoy the win over Akron yesterday. One fan base is happy over a 3 point win over Akron with a freshman making his first ever start at QB. One fan base is disappointed with losing even with a freshman making his first ever start at QB. If that isn't a testament to the state of the each of the programs, I dont know what is.
Lol, your whole butthurt post makes me glad I didn't follow up Pittsburgh's loss to Cleveland with a snide little "man, when our team beats yours, it's just another day at the office...you beat us and it's like you just won 15 Super Bowls in one afternoon" because I realized I'd look like a whiny little bitch if I did so. And, lo and behold, you did a sparkling job of proving that to be true.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Oct 19, 2014 8:05pm
Can anyone say run-on? Your burns might be a little better if you knew how to construct a sentence.Heretic;1664943 wrote:Lord, full retard has been achieved when "making a point" constitutes stating the obvious. Especially considering that, as said above, Ohio is using their back-up quarterback, too, so your "we had to use a back-up" excuse has no merit.
Lol, your whole butthurt post makes me glad I didn't follow up Pittsburgh's loss to Cleveland with a snide little "man, when our team beats yours, it's just another day at the office...you beat us and it's like you just won 15 Super Bowls in one afternoon" because I realized I'd look like a whiny little bitch if I did so. And, lo and behold, you did a sparkling job of proving that to be true.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Oct 19, 2014 8:24pm
Pick6;1664751 wrote:You're program has peaked.
No your not.Pick6;1664751 wrote:
I'm okay with the loss.
Learn the English language dumbass. This is like the 15th time you've done that
(obvious sarcasm bolded, since it will go over Pick's head)
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Oct 19, 2014 8:27pm
Congrats to Picky, S&L and Heretic for setting the record of the most consecutive posts ever on a sports message board that pertain to Akron and OU football. Way to go dipshits clap clap clap.
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Oct 19, 2014 8:45pm
How far if any does the loser of the egg bowl fall?
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Oct 19, 2014 8:50pm
Since it's the SEC, the loser will prob be 1b.gerb131;1664966 wrote:How far if any does the loser of the egg bowl fall?
believer
Posts: 8,153
Oct 19, 2014 9:58pm
At least 2 slots. That's quite a drop for an SEC team.gerb131;1664966 wrote:How far if any does the loser of the egg bowl fall?
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Oct 19, 2014 10:21pm
Pick went full bitch mode there. It's just Akron lol
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Oct 19, 2014 11:03pm
* you'relhslep134;1664958 wrote:No your not.
Learn the English language dumbass. This is like the 15th time you've done that
(obvious sarcasm bolded, since it will go over Pick's head)
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Oct 20, 2014 8:10am
In Akron it's spelled yorn.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Oct 20, 2014 9:55am
Surrender accepted!Pick6;1664955 wrote:Can anyone say run-on? Your burns might be a little better if you knew how to construct a sentence.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Oct 20, 2014 11:57am
Which part of my sarcasm did you not get? It was (I thought so anyways) an obvious joke making fun of Pick's utter inability to use correct grammarIronman92;1664998 wrote:* you're
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Oct 20, 2014 1:21pm
@BruceFeldmanCFB: RT @TMitrosilis: Here's a great goal line Vine of Notre Dame's PI vs. FSU. https://vine.co/v/ObOBAdPbI5a”
Yea. The offensive player definetly initiates contact and deserved the penalty.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
Yea. The offensive player definetly initiates contact and deserved the penalty.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Oct 20, 2014 1:26pm
100%, especially after ND got away with doing the same thing for a TD earlier in the gameMidstate01;1665086 wrote:
Yea. The offensive player definetly initiates contact and deserved the penalty.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Oct 20, 2014 1:58pm
My only thoughts on the ND/FSU call from someone who didn't give two shits who won. It's the old adage of...what's the "right" call versus what's the "typical" call.
By definition, the call was right. By definition, that call could be made on a ton of screen, sideline out and slant plays and it's ignored. It happens almost every time a team stacks one side of the field with 3 or 4 wide.
It's only magnified because of when it was called.
By definition, the call was right. By definition, that call could be made on a ton of screen, sideline out and slant plays and it's ignored. It happens almost every time a team stacks one side of the field with 3 or 4 wide.
It's only magnified because of when it was called.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Oct 20, 2014 2:02pm
I saw it for the first time this morning. We all heard about it from people on sat night and most were saying it was a 'bad' call. When I saw it I guess my first reaction was it was just too obvious. I have to error on the side that the call was the correct one even though I would ahve preferred ND to win the game.Azubuike24;1665099 wrote:My only thoughts on the ND/FSU call from someone who didn't give two shits who won. It's the old adage of...what's the "right" call versus what's the "typical" call.
By definition, the call was right. By definition, that call could be made on a ton of screen, sideline out and slant plays. It happens almost every time a team stacks one side of the field with 3 or 4 wide.
Teams are getting better at rubbing off the DB without making the contact. When the receiver has his arms up on front of him like he is blocking...just didnt do a good enough job to make it look good.
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Oct 20, 2014 2:05pm
I'm pretty much over it at this point. This guy breaks it down pretty well without saying one way or the other. I still think it was a bad call...but if ND can win out, they'll be in the playoffs.
http://www.wsbt.com/news/local/a-new-look-at-that-controversial-call-during-nd-vs-fsu/29231948?treets=wsbttv&tid=26514579613813&tml=wsbttv_noonheadlines&tmi=wsbttv_noonheadlines_1_11000110202014&ts=H
http://www.wsbt.com/news/local/a-new-look-at-that-controversial-call-during-nd-vs-fsu/29231948?treets=wsbttv&tid=26514579613813&tml=wsbttv_noonheadlines&tmi=wsbttv_noonheadlines_1_11000110202014&ts=H
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Oct 20, 2014 2:10pm
100% the right call. It was then and is now.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Oct 20, 2014 2:12pm
Then you're so misguided by your fandom as to be irrational.sherm03;1665103 wrote: I still think it was a bad call
You simply can't be blocking on a pass play and if you look at the goal line view it there was blatant blocking.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Oct 20, 2014 2:14pm
After seeing that view that's a complete bullshit callsherm03;1665103 wrote:I'm pretty much over it at this point. This guy breaks it down pretty well without saying one way or the other. I still think it was a bad call...but if ND can win out, they'll be in the playoffs.
http://www.wsbt.com/news/local/a-new-look-at-that-controversial-call-during-nd-vs-fsu/29231948?treets=wsbttv&tid=26514579613813&tml=wsbttv_noonheadlines&tmi=wsbttv_noonheadlines_1_11000110202014&ts=H
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Oct 20, 2014 2:17pm
That was a terrible video. The penalty was called on the holding, not on the slant.Crimson streak;1665110 wrote:After seeing that view that's a complete bullshit call
[video][/video]
That vine I just posted shows all you need to see.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Oct 20, 2014 2:18pm
Why? The offensive player drove the defensive backwards.Crimson streak;1665110 wrote:After seeing that view that's a complete bullshit call
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Oct 20, 2014 2:20pm
That view they showed in that video is terrible, it completely fails to show the clear penalty. Not surprised that's the view presented by the South Bend media and not the goal line view that shows the penaltyWebFire;1665117 wrote:Why? The offensive player drove the defensive backwards.